Comp Cam 218/218 .563 114 LSA
Thanks in advance.
<small>[ April 12, 2002, 10:12 AM: Message edited by: SS 2Grand ]</small>
A gain of 20-40rwhp depending on other mods ie;headers,pulley's ect.
Excellent drivability and Idle qualities.Power range of 1500-6000rpm with a broad torque spreed.
I'll be installing this as soon as it comes in.
Thunders GP is still going on if your looking for a deal.
I believe Reboot is using a MMS cam with those specs, with similar mods as you (using macs) plus pullies and is in the 360's rwhp and 370's rwtq, with stock heads on a A4. Making power up to 6500rpm.
Scott. 00 WS6 M6.
Here is the dyno:
Dyno
Can't wait to track test it. By the way, the first dyno run was after the first tune, we gained 5 rwhp by adjusting the timing. A/F tables look good.
- Tom
<img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Trending Topics
<strong>What do you think of this cam? My mods are in the sig. I'm really looking for help from a 35-45mph punch and I'm hoping this cam will help. This is intended for street use, not track. Also, I'm trying to avoid the idle problems, dieing, surging, etc. if possible. I'm willing to sacrifice some power for driveability.
Thanks in advance.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I have the same setup as you except I have macs with mac cats. That cam did 346 hp and 359 lb ft of torque in my 98 with a 100% stock maf, stock tuning, and a stock LS1 intake manifold. Also, it did over 340hp from 5100 all the way to my 6400 rpm limit.
You will have to drill the TB up a size or so and raise the idle with the set screw, but it's nothing major. I had some problems with the idle at first, but I was adjusting the idle back when it was 20 degrees outside. All I had to do to keep it alive was bring the rpms up to about 1500 for the first 10 seconds after starting the car. Now that its 50-60 degrees everyday, I can turn the car on and it never dies on me.
EDIT: Be sure to do plugs and wires at the same time, I went from 280hp on 6 cylinders to almost 350 with all 8. Ask Tom or Larry about it.
<small>[ April 13, 2002, 01:48 AM: Message edited by: JimTA ]</small>
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
<strong>Thanks for the input.
Tom Izzo is recommending I go with the 222/222 563/563 114lsa instead. What are the differences between this and the 218/218 563/563 114lsa? Good & Bad? I really want to avoid the idleing problems, so I'm going to dyno tune it as well.
Any thoughts?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">well, the difference would be more duration, chief. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
So there would not be much hp difference between the two, it would just be moved up the curve instead of being down low? Any more difficulty dialing in the idle in an A4 with the 222 vs. the 218?
I had one before moving up to a 224/224
Tom Izzo is recommending I go with the 222/222 563/563 114lsa instead. What are the differences between this and the 218/218 563/563 114lsa? Good & Bad? I really want to avoid the idleing problems, so I'm going to dyno tune it as well.
Any thoughts?




