-=CC 218/218 .563 UPDATE!=-
05-14-2002, 09:42 PM
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
-=CC 218/218 .563 UPDATE!=- Installed the cam on sunday and was going to wait to dyno it until I got the headers but. but I got anxious and went ahead and dynode it. Anywho with just the cam alone....
Previous 339/340
With Cam 363/349!!!
23 hp with just cam, none the less you could say I was ecstatic
JP
Previous 339/340
With Cam 363/349!!!
23 hp with just cam, none the less you could say I was ecstatic
JP
05-14-2002, 11:00 PM
#3
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: -=CC 218/218 .563 UPDATE!=- yea I am going to get tuning soooner or later. and the peak hp was at 6100 where stock rev limiter cam on, it was still climbing. Need to bump it up some. the torque was 349, I was told it was low because it was stock tuning.
<small>[ May 14, 2002, 11:01 PM: Message edited by: 2kredCSS ]</small>
<small>[ May 14, 2002, 11:01 PM: Message edited by: 2kredCSS ]</small>
05-14-2002, 11:09 PM
#4
9 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: -=CC 218/218 .563 UPDATE!=- Your going to be amazed at the gains once you have the headers installed. I have basically the same cam (MMS 218/218), stock heads and a A4. I just pulled 377RWHP 366RWTQ SAE corrected with stock 2000 pcm tuning on my 2001. I went with the 2000 pcm because of the additional timing over the 2001.
Check back after your header install, I bet you pull atleast 380RWHP with your M6.
Check back after your header install, I bet you pull atleast 380RWHP with your M6.
05-14-2002, 11:43 PM
#5
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: w.s.n.c.
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: -=CC 218/218 .563 UPDATE!=- It may also be that your torque will climb when you bump the rev limit. With the amount of lift you have it seems like it should. Also agree that headers will make a difference.
05-15-2002, 08:12 AM
#7
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: IL
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: -=CC 218/218 .563 UPDATE!=- Yep, This cam is great. I dynoed 332 rwhp in an A4 w/o headers. You really need to up your limiter as mine was 330rwhp @ 6000 all the way to 6500. Peaked at 332 @ 6250.
Dyno tuning helped my lower rpms but showed little gain up top. Maybe with headers it would be different.
Have fun with the cam.
- Tom
<img border="0" alt="[Burnout]" title="" src="graemlins/burnout.gif" />
<small>[ May 15, 2002, 08:14 AM: Message edited by: Tom99SS ]</small>
Dyno tuning helped my lower rpms but showed little gain up top. Maybe with headers it would be different.
Have fun with the cam.
- Tom
<img border="0" alt="[Burnout]" title="" src="graemlins/burnout.gif" />
<small>[ May 15, 2002, 08:14 AM: Message edited by: Tom99SS ]</small>
Trending Topics
05-15-2002, 11:31 AM
#9
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: w.s.n.c.
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: -=CC 218/218 .563 UPDATE!=- I think that the headers will have a bigger impact on torque. Given your high lift I think the torque is a little low. going out on a limb
JP also
JP also
