-=CC 218/218 .563 UPDATE!=-
Thread Starter
On The Tree
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: NC
-=CC 218/218 .563 UPDATE!=- Installed the cam on sunday and was going to wait to dyno it until I got the headers but. but I got anxious and went ahead and dynode it. Anywho with just the cam alone....
Previous 339/340
With Cam 363/349!!!
23 hp with just cam, none the less you could say I was ecstatic
JP
Previous 339/340
With Cam 363/349!!!
23 hp with just cam, none the less you could say I was ecstatic
JP
Thread Starter
On The Tree
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: NC
Re: -=CC 218/218 .563 UPDATE!=- yea I am going to get tuning soooner or later. and the peak hp was at 6100 where stock rev limiter cam on, it was still climbing. Need to bump it up some. the torque was 349, I was told it was low because it was stock tuning.
<small>[ May 14, 2002, 11:01 PM: Message edited by: 2kredCSS ]</small>
<small>[ May 14, 2002, 11:01 PM: Message edited by: 2kredCSS ]</small>
Re: -=CC 218/218 .563 UPDATE!=- Your going to be amazed at the gains once you have the headers installed. I have basically the same cam (MMS 218/218), stock heads and a A4. I just pulled 377RWHP 366RWTQ SAE corrected with stock 2000 pcm tuning on my 2001. I went with the 2000 pcm because of the additional timing over the 2001.
Check back after your header install, I bet you pull atleast 380RWHP with your M6.
Check back after your header install, I bet you pull atleast 380RWHP with your M6.
Re: -=CC 218/218 .563 UPDATE!=- It may also be that your torque will climb when you bump the rev limit. With the amount of lift you have it seems like it should. Also agree that headers will make a difference.
Re: -=CC 218/218 .563 UPDATE!=- Yep, This cam is great. I dynoed 332 rwhp in an A4 w/o headers. You really need to up your limiter as mine was 330rwhp @ 6000 all the way to 6500. Peaked at 332 @ 6250.
Dyno tuning helped my lower rpms but showed little gain up top. Maybe with headers it would be different.
Have fun with the cam.
- Tom
<img border="0" alt="[Burnout]" title="" src="graemlins/burnout.gif" />
<small>[ May 15, 2002, 08:14 AM: Message edited by: Tom99SS ]</small>
Dyno tuning helped my lower rpms but showed little gain up top. Maybe with headers it would be different.
Have fun with the cam.
- Tom
<img border="0" alt="[Burnout]" title="" src="graemlins/burnout.gif" />
<small>[ May 15, 2002, 08:14 AM: Message edited by: Tom99SS ]</small>
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
