Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Reverse torquer cam (the other side of the coin)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2007, 01:16 PM
  #161  
On The Tree
 
BlueGoat06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Predator, would you recomend the MTI X1 cam for an LS2 GTO, or a bigger reverse split like you mentioned in post # 51, 238/234, 605/.598 109-1 (109LSA and 110 ICL)

Last edited by BlueGoat06; 09-17-2007 at 01:27 PM.
Old 09-17-2007, 09:56 PM
  #162  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
SSkillz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dallas Tx
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Any thought on the F1 cam 591/569 112+2 ??
Old 09-18-2007, 12:19 AM
  #163  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BlueGoat06
Predator, would you recomend the MTI X1 cam for an LS2 GTO, or a bigger reverse split like you mentioned in post # 51, 238/234, 605/.598 109-1 (109LSA and 110 ICL)
That would be a bit too much for DD on a 364,

234/232 .600/.595 110-1 LSA would be nice, 13* overlap (nice lope), strong midrange trq, intake biased from TDC for good carry after peak, peak ~6300 rpm, compatible with any fuel grade

Needs good exhaust (LT headers, no cats)
Old 09-18-2007, 01:24 AM
  #164  
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
LIL SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Jose area
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I have been going through cam ideas in my head for a good week now. I'm kind of leaning towards a 236/230 XFI 107 +1

IVC 45*
EVO 44*
OVL 17*
DCR 8.50

This is not a DD by any means.

Last edited by LIL SS; 09-18-2007 at 02:10 AM.
Old 09-18-2007, 01:25 AM
  #165  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
2000Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, Fl. - Hurricane Highway
Posts: 2,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So from what i read so far if your going to just install bolt-ons and a cam, your better off going with a reverse split because of the area where you will be making your power. And if your going to go with bolt-ons, cam, heads, intake, then your better off with a traditional split cam. Am i in the same ball park as what we are talking about?
-Joel
Old 09-18-2007, 01:26 AM
  #166  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (34)
 
Websy21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I got to give it to ya Predator, this is one of the best cam threads ever. Alot of info and it keeps on getting dug up. I love it! Keep it coming guys
Old 09-18-2007, 01:28 AM
  #167  
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
LIL SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Jose area
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I think it's more intake dictated assuming you have a good exhaust system. Good heads typically have a better Coef than stock heads. But there are other considerations too.. Are you staying NA, or planing an N20?
Old 09-18-2007, 02:24 AM
  #168  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2000Hawk
So from what i read so far if your going to just install bolt-ons and a cam, your better off going with a reverse split because of the area where you will be making your power. And if your going to go with bolt-ons, cam, heads, intake, then your better off with a traditional split cam. Am i in the same ball park as what we are talking about?
-Joel
Yeah basicaly,

If you plan on not changing intake, MAF etc... and use average flow heads (mildly ported stock castings, small valves etc..), reverse allows you to manipulate the valve events in a manner to produce monster midrange trq (which is the power range we mostly use on the street).

So instead of shoving in a BIG cam that will need many other mods to achieve it's true potential, you can have a good exhaust and a reverse that will achieve equal performance.

Let me remind everyone that performance are not dyno numbers, but actual on road/track results.
Old 09-18-2007, 08:43 AM
  #169  
On The Tree
 
BlueGoat06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
That would be a bit too much for DD on a 364,

234/232 .600/.595 110-1 LSA would be nice, 13* overlap (nice lope), strong midrange trq, intake biased from TDC for good carry after peak, peak ~6300 rpm, compatible with any fuel grade

Needs good exhaust (LT headers, no cats)
great info as always predator,

now, looking at the VE's on that cam

IVO: 6
IVC: 48
EVO: 45
EVC: 7
ovl: 13*

what benefits in performance, if any, would i get opening the intake valve 2* earlier, and having a bit more overlap with a 236/234 .602/.598 109 - 1

IVO: 8
IVC: 48
EVO: 45
EVC: 9
ovl: 17*
Old 09-18-2007, 09:14 AM
  #170  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BlueGoat06
great info as always predator,

now, looking at the VE's on that cam

IVO: 6
IVC: 48
EVO: 45
EVC: 7
ovl: 13*

what benefits in performance, if any, would i get opening the intake valve 2* earlier, and having a bit more overlap with a 236/234 .602/.598 109 - 1

IVO: 8
IVC: 48
EVO: 45
EVC: 9
ovl: 17*
Because that 2*earlier translates into 2 things, 2* later EVC and 4* more overlap which is gonna make this puppy have too much bleeding to actualy benefit from the extra intake on a stock valve.
Not to mention it is gonna be a bit harder to tune, might not fit on intake side. If you want to bring in more intake, use a XFI on intake lobe (like I did with my 224/222) and the added lift will act like a crutch and let more charge in.
Old 09-18-2007, 09:15 AM
  #171  
On The Tree
 
fueledpassion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Yeah basicaly,

If you plan on not changing intake, MAF etc... and use average flow heads (mildly ported stock castings, small valves etc..), reverse allows you to manipulate the valve events in a manner to produce monster midrange trq (which is the power range we mostly use on the street).

So instead of shoving in a BIG cam that will need many other mods to achieve it's true potential, you can have a good exhaust and a reverse that will achieve equal performance.

Let me remind everyone that performance are not dyno numbers, but actual on road/track results.

How about you send me one of those "idea" cams, and I'll purchase some patriot heads and see where the power ends up. I already have a base dyno, so we could really get a good idea of what it's all about. Anywho, nice thoughts..
Old 09-18-2007, 09:21 AM
  #172  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fueledpassion
How about you send me one of those "idea" cams, and I'll purchase some patriot heads and see where the power ends up. I already have a base dyno, so we could really get a good idea of what it's all about. Anywho, nice thoughts..
Some of my reverse grinds are floating around, I have one, a couple of others have asked me to keep the matter hush-hush (for competition sake). It does work.
There used to be an old member here that would back me up on that (53pony) but many poeple though then he had a screw loose (just for thinking outside the box, like not mainstream).
Old 09-18-2007, 11:29 AM
  #173  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
BlueSLPCamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey Pred.
I've been debating between the Tr230 and the MTI X1, from what I've read in the thread the Tr230 is better. Will the Tr230 still perform better even with a high stall like a 3600? (shifts above 4000 though)
Also I will be running cats no-matter what to pass inspection, is it worth using a reverse grind even though I'm running cats?
Old 09-18-2007, 01:04 PM
  #174  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BlueSLPCamaro
Hey Pred.
I've been debating between the Tr230 and the MTI X1, from what I've read in the thread the Tr230 is better. Will the Tr230 still perform better even with a high stall like a 3600? (shifts above 4000 though)
Also I will be running cats no-matter what to pass inspection, is it worth using a reverse grind even though I'm running cats?
Cats is easy, if visual inspection>>>gut them
What 3600 stall, VIG?, yes it will work with that kinda stall, 3500>4000 would be my choice, 2.2>2.5 str
Old 09-18-2007, 04:26 PM
  #175  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
BlueSLPCamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've thought about gutting my cats Won't the inspector notice that my car smells like gas!?

I have Yanks SS3600, browsing for cams now and hoping to have everything done this spring (its a DD). I know these reverse grind cams are good for under the curve power. I just wanted to make sure a 3600 would work great with these cams. And if not I would look for one that will work better with my stall
Old 09-18-2007, 04:32 PM
  #176  
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
LIL SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Jose area
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Sean did get a lot of flack for thinking a little different.
Old 09-18-2007, 10:13 PM
  #177  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
2000Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, Fl. - Hurricane Highway
Posts: 2,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So what is it that causes the reverse split cams to take a back seat to a traditional split when aftermarket heads are involved? Is it that when you through in heads, the traditional split will be able to take advantage of more flow?
-Joel
Old 09-18-2007, 11:26 PM
  #178  
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
LIL SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Jose area
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

With out the intake restriction, more or less yes.
Old 09-19-2007, 09:00 AM
  #179  
On The Tree
 
fueledpassion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This is very interesting to say the least though. I'd like to be one of those bone heads that maxed out a reverse-split design.

I'm assuming that 205cc heads would be better than 215cc or 225cc? Seriously though, a 402 w/ some mild heads and a reverse-split sound so good right now. I can imagine the loads of fun I'd have in the twisties.

More info please...
Old 09-19-2007, 10:24 AM
  #180  
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
LIL SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Jose area
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

One thing to look at for drag racing is the work over time. Example being:

I made a pull to 105mph in my truck that I logged. Here is the time spent in each RPM range:

4k and bellow: 2.3 seconds (20%)
4k to 5,500: 5.1 seconds (44%)
5,500 to 7k: 4.2 seconds (36%)
--------------------------
Total time 11.6

Now this was not a full 1/4 but I was still only at 5,200rpm in third when I let out. By my estimation, I'd probably be at about 110mph at 5,500 which I'm guessing is about where this truck would trap the way it sits.

So if you look at work over time, based on my final gearing, I would want a cam that really works that 4k to 5,500 rpm range but still holds strong to 7k.


Quick Reply: Reverse torquer cam (the other side of the coin)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 AM.