when you guys go internal/build-up, do you keep your MAFT?
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech20year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I just got headers, and thought i would be done modding for a while, or at least till i got enough money. Now i have enough for a MAFT. )for the record, i like to plan ahead).
So i want to ATAP my car, and was wondering that with the money i have saved now, as a last bolt on mod for a little bit, if i should get a MAFT. As for planning ahead, i have always looked at this mod as a "trick", which some have said, for your computer, so-to-speak. So, in the future, with a cam, and lets just say hypothetically speaking, an entire engine build (not just H/C, because that i could use it on), would i still need the MAFT with custom programming? ........making this a waste?
<small>[ June 20, 2002, 06:05 PM: Message edited by: R U A LS1 ]</small>
So i want to ATAP my car, and was wondering that with the money i have saved now, as a last bolt on mod for a little bit, if i should get a MAFT. As for planning ahead, i have always looked at this mod as a "trick", which some have said, for your computer, so-to-speak. So, in the future, with a cam, and lets just say hypothetically speaking, an entire engine build (not just H/C, because that i could use it on), would i still need the MAFT with custom programming? ........making this a waste?
<small>[ June 20, 2002, 06:05 PM: Message edited by: R U A LS1 ]</small>
#3
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: wilmington delaware
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
well i cant speak for everyone but id say if youre going to go that far you might as well throw up the dough for ls1 edit. better than a maft is.
#5
Launching!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm going to be keeping my MAFT once my heads and cam are installed. The main reason is my computer will be reprogrammed by MMS and setup to run well at 5800'. For some of my trips to low altitude I'll have to add a bit of fuel in with the MAFT to avoid running lean.
#7
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech20year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Jsears8:
<strong>I have LS1 Edit tuning but I still use my MAFT to adjust for weather condidtions.
Justin</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">hmm maybe ill get one. Now i know whether can affect A/F mixtures. Duh! But, how does it go? higher altitude is richer because of less dence air (less air molecules) and richer at low <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> And i know colder is better for performance but i have just though because of less detonation hence stoich A/F, where as hot being lean causing ping. So 100* at 5000 feet would be the worst. Am i correct or, uh, how does it go?
<strong>I have LS1 Edit tuning but I still use my MAFT to adjust for weather condidtions.
Justin</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">hmm maybe ill get one. Now i know whether can affect A/F mixtures. Duh! But, how does it go? higher altitude is richer because of less dence air (less air molecules) and richer at low <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> And i know colder is better for performance but i have just though because of less detonation hence stoich A/F, where as hot being lean causing ping. So 100* at 5000 feet would be the worst. Am i correct or, uh, how does it go?
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Addict
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Remember factory system can and does measure altitude density, and adjusts fuel and timing accordingly for emissions and best performance(Factory Parameters) <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
#9
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech20year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by LS1derfull:
<strong>Remember factory system can and does measure altitude density, and adjusts fuel and timing accordingly for emissions and best performance(Factory Parameters) <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sooo, what are you saying?
<strong>Remember factory system can and does measure altitude density, and adjusts fuel and timing accordingly for emissions and best performance(Factory Parameters) <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sooo, what are you saying?