My cam Graphs
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
My cam Graphs As some of you requested, here is my cam graphs
In the first post i added the graphs.. and i will put them here too
Lost my original pull that gave me my numbers...
FIRST PULL WITH CAM
I FORGOT WHAT THIS GRAPH SHOW
NICE A:F
CORRECTED NUMBERS
In the first post i added the graphs.. and i will put them here too
Lost my original pull that gave me my numbers...
FIRST PULL WITH CAM I FORGOT WHAT THIS GRAPH SHOW NICE A:F CORRECTED NUMBERS Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by brad8266
Nice flat TQ curve. 350lbs-ft @ 3500 on a stang dyno is great. Looks good man.
but damn this bucking at 1400 - 1700 RPMs, the slight hesitation between 1500 - 2500 RPMs when driving slow you can lightly feel the car jerking some times it pops like a backfire.. and the warm start.. But man i must say the tuner is great. we talked on the phone last night for 2 hours aobut the problems. He is very willing to work with me and keep helping me out...
I think i amy need a 4.10 gear to lower the TQ curve down so that the damn bucking will go away
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by brad8266
yeah a steeper gear will help, and your gonna have to have that tuned real good to stop that bucking/hesitation.
yea we are working on it. that is why it is going back monday. the 4.10 should prolly cure the problem :crosses fingers: car is not fun to drive right now..
espically since when i am crusing at 40 - 50 that is around where the car bucks in 5th car.
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by N4cer
Those dyno sheets aren't right bro. The torque and HP curves should always intersect at 5252rpm. Am I just reading it wrong?
no idea.. to be honest i am not a pro graph reader
Trending Topics
LOL that sounds like an odd job. Kinda like this job:
http://ca.video.yahoo.com/video/play...16135&fr=yvmtf
But seriously, you should probably look into that to make sure the graph is valid. You get what I'm saying about the graph, right?
http://ca.video.yahoo.com/video/play...16135&fr=yvmtf
But seriously, you should probably look into that to make sure the graph is valid. You get what I'm saying about the graph, right?
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Originally Posted by N4cer
LOL that sounds like an odd job. Kinda like this job:
http://ca.video.yahoo.com/video/play...16135&fr=yvmtf
But seriously, you should probably look into that to make sure the graph is valid. You get what I'm saying about the graph, right?
http://ca.video.yahoo.com/video/play...16135&fr=yvmtf
But seriously, you should probably look into that to make sure the graph is valid. You get what I'm saying about the graph, right?
yeah they dont seem to intersect right. Whats up with that??
I didnt look at that at first, all i looked at was the tq curve. 
Originally Posted by -Joseph-
Graph looks right, the HP and TQ scaling are not graphed using the same scale. Tq on left start at 100lb ft, while HP on the right starts at 0.
Yeah I just noticed that, Joseph. Not to take anything from the original poster, because those are good numbers no matter how you look at it. But why would the scaling be set up that way? To make the torque look higher to uninformed customers? It throws the simplicity off for absolutely no good reason that I can think of.
Originally Posted by N4cer
Yeah I just noticed that, Joseph. Not to take anything from the original poster, because those are good numbers no matter how you look at it. But why would the scaling be set up that way? To make the torque look higher to uninformed customers? It throws the simplicity off for absolutely no good reason that I can think of.
TECH Resident
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
From: AUSTIN TX
Well it looks like your HP peaked sooner than you were thinking in your original post. Looks like it peaked right about 6300-6400 which is just about perfect. I was a little worried when you said it peaked at 6600 because I ordered a similar cam but with only 2 deg advance. Hopefully mine will not peak much higher than yours (6400-6500).
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by -Joseph-
Graph looks right, the HP and TQ scaling are not graphed using the same scale. Tq on left start at 100lb ft, while HP on the right starts at 0.
Thanks for clearign that up... i ahd not idea honestly...
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by N4cer
Yeah I just noticed that, Joseph. Not to take anything from the original poster, because those are good numbers no matter how you look at it. But why would the scaling be set up that way? To make the torque look higher to uninformed customers? It throws the simplicity off for absolutely no good reason that I can think of.
It is what it is...
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by BOWTIE
Well it looks like your HP peaked sooner than you were thinking in your original post. Looks like it peaked right about 6300-6400 which is just about perfect. I was a little worried when you said it peaked at 6600 because I ordered a similar cam but with only 2 deg advance. Hopefully mine will not peak much higher than yours (6400-6500).
yea i looked at it wrong... it peaks at 6400 and i set the rev limiter to 6600...
The +4 is a more down low cam.. torquer..
The +2 is more of a top end cam...
Originally Posted by NBM2001Z28
Actually I never noticed our dyno had the scales set up like that. Ill change the defaults on monday. I guess its something I never noticed on there...
those are some sweet numbers,congrats.i would of thought it would have peaked around 6100-6200 or so though as my 228r 112 +2 peaked there but anyways yours carries power out great.anyways great numbers.