Milling heads on stock internal motor?
can the block be decked? is piston clearance with the head an issue if it gets machined?
feedback appreciated!
gotta take it to the machine shop tomorrow for a good hone job and was interested if this was worth while at the same time, said he would do the head 25 per side
<small>[ August 22, 2002, 04:10 PM: Message edited by: SlowLS1 ]</small>
I say yes, definately do it. A buddy of mine did a little experimenting with doing as much possible to a stock motor without actually changing the internals. He milled his heads .040, and put them back on a stock internal motor. The car made 360 rwhp with all the normal bolt ons and nothing else. This is a 99 car with the stock LS1 intake also, no help from an ls6 intake like the 01 cars...
It's kind of hard for compression to hurt unless you're building a boost motor or run a LOT of timing. There are to many advantages to higher compression, I would say mill the heads at least .030. Go for it...
Josh
On a stock valvetrain and cam, how much before pushrods have to be changed to shorter ones?
Will .030" throw off the geometry of mating parts such as the intake manifold enough to cause vacuum leaks or alignment issues?
I'm ready to do it, but can't afford to cause other mechanial problems or change pushrods.
Thanks, just curious, what would the compression be with .030" milled heads and stock 5.7 heads and pistons?
itll end up costing over 100 bucks by the time you are done for maybe 5 horses at the rear.
i've paid alot more for 5rwhp before <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" />
Trending Topics
Can i mill the heads .030" and still use stock pushrods and not have vacuum leaks on the intake?
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
If you want to keep it basically stock, why not install the 2002 LS6 cam and valve springs while your at it? They are very resonably priced...
Ron,
How much is the ls6 cam only, i already have the springs
http://www.sdpc2000.com/cart.asp?act...1981&pid=81649
BTW, the 2002 LS6 cam has a smaller base circle than the LS1 cam. With your heads being milled [and] the LS6 cam, you would need your stock length pushrods.
Ron,
with the z06 cam having a .050" smaller base cirle and heads being milled .030" that still leaves .050" on the table, will that make the valve train noisy? will there be any valve to piston clearance issues?
Heads being milled .030" would need .030" [shorter] pushrods.
A combination of the two would actually require a pushrod that was .020" longer than stock if you wanted the exact lifter preload as you had when stock.
.020" is not enough to cause any problems. Hydraulic lifters have a + - margin that they can operate betweeen due to the way they are designed. I dont think .020" falls outside of the margin.
Ron,
<small>[ August 22, 2002, 10:57 PM: Message edited by: Kimchee and Rice ]</small>
i believe the tolerance for the lifters is .030"
so pushrod length should be fine with .030" milled heads.
all i need to know now is if the valve to piston clearance would be an issue with that setup, and is there gonna be any problems with rocker arm geometry?
Thanks for all the great info, i have reasearched the z06 cam alot but have never really considered doing this combo..! I'm very cose to ordering parts if those two above things won't be an issue!
Don't know personally much about the cam, but your stock LS1 cam is approx 200/208 .497/.500 117 LSA
As you can see from the link I posted, the 2002 LS6 cam is a hell of a lot more than that. There are alot of cams out there that will reap better gains, but you sdaid you wanted to keep it stock. In that case, the 2002 LS6 cam would be the best choice.
Ron,






