Nickn20

<img src="http://home.attbi.com/~nickn20/367rwhp.jpg" alt=" - " />

the Graph says it all, FLP headers, custom 3 inch Y-pipe, Corsa Catback,D-flo lid/K&N, Ported TB, LS6 MAF and LS1 edit tuning by me <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> no ASP pulley yet, they are on backorder <img border="0" title="" alt="[Sad]" src="gr_sad.gif" />

whats the highest bolton dyno around?

<small>[ October 03, 2002, 01:12 AM: Message edited by: Nickn20 ]</small>

niphilli

Whoa! nice #'s. Do you have an LS6 intake ('01-up car??). Incredible #'s either way. You will probably see 370 with pulley <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" />

verbs

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Nickn20:
<strong> <img src="http://home.attbi.com/~nickn20/367rwhp.jpg" alt=" - " />

the Graph says it all, FLP headers, custom 3 inch Y-pipe, Corsa Catback, Ported TB, LS6 MAF and LS1 edit tuning by me <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> no ASP pulley yet, they are on backorder <img border="0" title="" alt="[Sad]" src="gr_sad.gif" />

whats the highest bolton dyno around?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Someone here hit 380rwhp.......

I hit 371rwhp/380rwtq max but did it through 33spline 12 bolt rear end w/ 3.73's.....

And I did have pullies, but no LS1 edit tuning.

The Juggernaut

iTrader: (7)

No offense,but it looks like there is a cam in the car.
Tq less than HP and it peaks @ what 5600?

I'm not trying to be a dick,but that's what it looks like to me.

It is a nice graph,though.

EDIT- I'm not saying the power is out of line.
I made 365rwhp/380RWTQ.With a aluminium drivshaft.M6
Peaked @5200hp/4200Tq.

<small>[ October 02, 2002, 06:58 PM: Message edited by: 01-Z ]</small>

Savageite

Nice numbers. My numbers are in my sig. I'm a little disapointed with my numbers I think they should be higher. But I did only have 5500 miles on the car.

verbs

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by 01-Z:
<strong>No offense,but it looks like there is a cam in the car.
Tq less than HP and it peaks @ what 5600?

I'm not trying to be a dick,but that's what it looks like to me.

It is a nice graph,though.

EDIT- I'm not saying the power is out of line.
I made 365rwhp/380RWTQ.With a aluminium drivshaft.M6
Peaked @5200hp/4200Tq.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Mine peaked at 5300rpms with my setup FWIW

wot247

im tryin to figure out why you would think a cammed car would peak at 5600?? This car was a fast car when it was stock and now its crazy w/ bolt ons and ls1 edit..........when the next step is taken with it you will see how much a "real setup" will make in this car.

Nickn20

I guess I should mention a few more details, car is a 2002 with dealer plates still, lol 2800 miles on the clock also, and its a 6 speed.

I my timing tables could be advanced a little more at peak TQ on that run yes I think that would bring the peak down some. why would a bigger than stock cammed car drop power at 5800? its just timing that makes it look that way, and from the AF graph is needs some more work but I only got 3 pulls.

<small>[ October 03, 2002, 12:38 AM: Message edited by: Nickn20 ]</small>

Nickn20

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Savageite:
<strong>Nice numbers. My numbers are in my sig. I'm a little disapointed with my numbers I think they should be higher. But I did only have 5500 miles on the car.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">nice times man, this car is lower with a prokit, and bilsteins so it has a real tough time getting off the line, with a ram clutch too.... best 60 ft is a 2.16, the car with 100 extra pounds trapped a traction limited 13.1@109.7 with a 2.2 60ft.

Hybrid Slow

So what is it, manifold or no manifold?

If so, is it the Holley aluminum LS6 or SLP modified LS1 manifold? Or?

Also, you said "all the bolt-ons..." You have about 3 more things left to get, or do. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" />

Nickn20

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Hybrid 8x:
<strong>So what is it, manifold or no manifold?

If so, is it the Holley aluminum LS6 or SLP modified LS1 manifold? Or?

Also, you said "all the bolt-ons..." You have about 3 more things left to get, or do. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">stock 02 manifold, the holley unported is a waste, and IMO a track only mod. what boltons have we missed, besides the pulley?

Note I just added the lid in there, I forgot hehe.

WICKED SS

iTrader: (36)

Nice numbers and good job on the tuning Nick!
Whos car is this? Man I need LS1 Edit, think I could hit over 400rwhp with your help <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> ?

<small>[ October 03, 2002, 01:22 AM: Message edited by: WICKED SS ]</small>

CRASH 02

iTrader: (3)

Nice numbers. It is a little strange how your tq is lower than your hp though. I also have an 02 with most of the bolt-ons and my tq is a lot higher than my hp. To the tune of 364hp 384tq.

Nickn20

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by CRASH 02:
<strong>Nice numbers. It is a little strange how your tq is lower than your hp though. I also have an 02 with most of the bolt-ons and my tq is a lot higher than my hp. To the tune of 364hp 384tq.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">we let the car cool down, and it hit 366/365 on another pull, I need to make the A/F a little better and maybe some more timing in certain areas.

sununix69

I call BS!!

I think its a doctored/photoshop edited Dyno Graph or the car has a mild cam and hes not telling.

Nickn20

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by sununix69:
<strong>I call BS!!

I think its a doctored/photoshop edited Dyno Graph or the car has a mild cam and hes not telling.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">you are the expert. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" />

let me know when your cammed car gets in the 12s. just like that time you ran at sears point when they were remodeling it for about a year. <img border="0" alt="[bullshit]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_bs.gif" /> unless I see video I won't believe it, and your timeslips well I can already tell you they are fake. so quit your whining <img border="0" alt="[whiner]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cry.gif" />

Z O SICK

iTrader: (1)

I think my 01 did o.k. Mods are in sig.
346rwhp 360wrtq <img border="0" alt="[Camaro]" title="" src="graemlins/camaro.gif" />

verbs

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by sununix69:
<strong>I call BS!!

I think its a doctored/photoshop edited Dyno Graph or the car has a mild cam and hes not telling.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">After looking at one of my bolt on dynos (before my ported TB), I realized that my car's peaks aren't far off from his....

If you notice, my car's hp peaked at 5400rpms, and his was at 5600rpms. My torque peaked at 4600rpms, and his at 4900rpms.

Both of us held our horsepower levels pretty well all the way to the redline. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />

I used to get accused of having a small cam at times, especially since I was dynoing through a 33spline 12 bolt w/ 3.73s. <img border="0" alt="[jester]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_jest.gif" />

<img src="http://www.nissaninfiniticlub.net/vbulletin225/attachment.php?s=&postid=194" alt=" - " />

<img src="http://home.attbi.com/~nickn20/367rwhp.jpg" alt=" - " />

<small>[ October 03, 2002, 02:39 PM: Message edited by: verbs ]</small>

Skelton

My 01SS's dyno sheet looks almost identical to yours but I'm only making 358-362 with just about mod for mod of what you have. It does run consistant 113-114 though with absolutely no weight reduction. I think some dyno's just give higher readings than others. My 01 formula only gives me 335-402 but it will run 117 at will at 3180 raceweight

Nickn20

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Y2K Blackbird:
<strong>My 01SS's dyno sheet looks almost identical to yours but I'm only making 358-362 with just about mod for mod of what you have. It does run consistant 113-114 though with absolutely no weight reduction. I think some dyno's just give higher readings than others. My 01 formula only gives me 335-402 but it will run 117 at will at 3180 raceweight</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">what kind of 60 ft? you don't have gears?