Is this to much flow for a 346?
and r the valves to big for a 346???
I believe that was a quote from SAM instructor Jud Massingale. <img border="0" alt="[Driving]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_driving3.gif" />
Brian
<strong>Heads were flowed on a SF 600 @28" h2o w/ 2.055/1.60 Ferra valves. Heads flow: Int .200-127 .300-190 .400-241 .500-277 .550-289 .600-296 Exh. .200-99 .300-143 .400-176 .500-201 .550-209 .600-215...
and r the valves to big for a 346???</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Personally, I think the flow numbers are a little low for using 2.055 valves. If you can get someone to look at them that knows LS1 heads, you might be able to tweak a little more out of them. Remember the valve job is just as (or more) important than the port work. My guess is, like Fennis suggested, is the mid range could be improved.
Trending Topics
You can't measure velocity on a flow bench. If your ports are too large for your combo, the flow numbers will look great, but TQ and throttle response will be poor.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
<strong>You can't measure velocity on a flow bench. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Actually, you can. As long as your flowbench is equipped with a velocity probe. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> Pretty neat little tool. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
<strong>For all those who are saying there is no such thing as heads that flow too well, you are dead wrong. I can't tell you how many times I've seen this happen --- the flow #'s are great but the real-world performance sucks.
You can't measure velocity on a flow bench. If your ports are too large for your combo, the flow numbers will look great, but TQ and throttle response will be poor.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Most heads like the ones you described are either hogged out or have trouble keeping a uniform cross-sectional velocity. The tell-tale signs of this or often overlooked by those preoccupied with flow numbers at lifts their cams will never reach <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by HITMANSS:
<strong>You can't measure velocity on a flow bench. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Actually, you can. As long as your flowbench is equipped with a velocity probe. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> Pretty neat little tool. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Didn't know that --- sounds neat. Never seen any published #'s though.
*****
I also think the flow #'s posted are a bit on the low side, especially below .500". Were these heads flowed w/ an LS6 intake attached? Was there a 6" pipe on the exhaust?
<small>[ December 27, 2002, 09:14 AM: Message edited by: HITMANSS ]</small>







