Opinions on this H/C combo
SLP Stage III LS6 Cylinder Heads
* CNC-ported and hand-blended chambers, ports, and bowls
* Swirl-polished 2.08"/1.60" stainless steel valves
* Milled 63.5cc combustion chambers
* High-performance, multi-angle valve job
* Heavy-duty dual 1.250" springs
* Titanium valve-spring retainers
* New, correct-size seats (not cut stock units)
* Heavy-duty, oversized chrome-moly valve locks
* Bronze guides
SLP Camshaft.
Camshaft Specs: Valve Lift Duration@.050
in: .576" 234º
ex: .571" 228º
Centerline - 112º Lobe Separation - 113º
If your planning on spending some money on some nice heads, I would suggest that you look into some AFR 205s or the TFS 215s, and a cam to match whichever one of those you choose, which won't be the SLP cam.
My .02
good luck though .. if you do that setup, **with a good tune** -- you'll be happy
good luck though .. if you do that setup, **with a good tune** -- you'll be happy
Per their website:
We teamed up with AFR to bring you these street/strip heads and matched them with one of our high performance LS1/LS2/LS6 cams for an even better deal. They flow enough air (up to 320 CFM intake) to work with all LS1, LS2 or LS6 small blocks as large as 427 cubic inches, down to a well-built 346. The secret to the high flow numbers is CNC porting and a newly-designed combustion chamber with a double quench pad area.
Another reason we picked these heads is the rugged design that can live on top of a high-power engine. Don�t worry if you use nitrous or a blower because AFR�s 3/4 inch-thick deck is standard, along with reinforced rocker stud bosses, thick-wall runners and interlocking ductile iron valve seats. To maximize performance, we include double springs (.600 inch max lift) and titanium retainers.
To really get the full potential of these heads we matched them to our most aggressive cam for engines in the 346 CID/5.7L range.
Trending Topics
.. Well I guess that supports my opinion even more ..
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
What are your goals for the car? Do you want an aggressive, lopey idle? What will you use the car for? A little more information and we'll be able to set you up with something that will work well.
What are your goals for the car? Do you want an aggressive, lopey idle? What will you use the car for? A little more information and we'll be able to set you up with something that will work well.
I've got HP Tuners, and while definitely not a professional tuner, I can tune for a cam. I just didn't want something that was going to be a pain in the *** to tune. If I had to chose between top end power and low end torque, I would lean toward torque. I think that would be more usable on an everyday basis.
Last edited by 2000c-5; May 29, 2007 at 07:41 PM.
Good luck.
BTW, really with the street ability of any cam -- the tune is the most important factor and what you are willing to drive/tolerate with
There are several guys tryn some tighter lsa cams, to gain more low-mid torque, but they arent as easy to dial in, as some have had a fair amount of issues regarding this.
You definately want to mill the heads and use a .040 gasket to get a tighter quench and a bump in compression. I am running my AFRs milled .024 to 62cc with the Cometic .040s, which results in a static CR of 11.34-1. I am also running 93 pump gas and have never had an issue with detonation.
The reason I was asking such specific questions about these heads is, they were for sale in Ebay. He had the heads, cam, timing chain, hi volume oil pump, shortened pushrods and install kit (gaskets, etc). He wanted $2450 with a starting bid of $1900. In a 5 day auction, nobody had bid on it and I was just curious why, if there was something wrong with the combo. When I went to check on it, there was only 3 seconds left and I missed out on it. Some guy put in a $1900 bid with about 5 minutes left and won it.
I'm still in the market. Now I can make my own choice. Thanks for all the advice, I'm using this thread to make a decision.
Be VERY grateful you didnt win those heads! That's waaay too much material removed, and will definately hinder flow, not to mention substantially reduce P-V clearance.



