Bigger Is Not Better!!!!!!!!!
Trending Topics
For me it took over a year of reading & research to find the heads/cam combo that fit my driving style & goals for my car.
Smaller cams like the 224 have plenty of advantages. They make good peak power, very solid mid range & usually pretty good bottom too. Not to mention they are easier on your valvetrain & you can keep your A/C without tuning issues more readily.
I'm glad I went with the 224 cam personally. My car is still currently on the stock tune & runs fine with the A/C on full blast. Never has idling issues & so far has been quite impressive. I also still have my stock LS1 intake on for the time being. I need some new intake gaskets before installin my ported Lingenfelter.
So far I have only had 1 race & it was against a 98-02' Firehawk(who tried pickin on me) with exhaust. I put a little over 4 cars on him from a 20 roll & I let out at 90mph. Not bad for a small cam, stock intake, little ol' 5.3 heads & stock tune. Me & Bo White are hoping for 420RWHP out of my set-up & if I hit that I'll be overly happy from my baby combo.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Stock cubes I'd prefer small to mid sized cam, but on anything over a 347ci, I'd go with a cam over 23X/23X 59X/59X specs since the bigger cubes will work better with the bigger cam.
If your not lookin for a max effort set-up on stock short bolck, then a mild to small cam is the way to go, especially on a daily driver. But this is just my personal opinion. Also people must remember just b/c you make 40 more HP than a smaller cam set-up doesn't mean your faster. I have seen smaller set-ups E.T. guys at the track with bigger cams that were boasting about their dyno number.
ive fooled with 5 liter mustangs most my life and the cam i put in my car is small to mild in a ls1c but would be huge in a 5 liter its weird.....
no matter wat yall say the bigger the better. when it comes down to N/A that is. u start havin power adders its a different story



