Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

too much compression???

Old Sep 24, 2007 | 07:19 PM
  #1  
SS101's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 1
Default too much compression???

okay, from a few of my other posts it was revealed to me that my SCR for my upcoming stroker build was a little too low (planned on a 10.6:1)...so i played around with the pistons and manged to up the sqeeze factor to 11.49:1 (that's if i managed to calculate it correctly ). my question is this: is that going to raise my dymanic CR too high to run on pump gas (93)??

AFR 225cc heads with 72cc chamber and a 243/249 .629/.629 112+2 Lsa cam.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 07:26 PM
  #2  
brad8266's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

How did you get 11.49 with a 72cc head? Explain your motor setup.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 07:35 PM
  #3  
CockerKid009's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: Central IL
Default

wow- if your numbers are correct that thing should be a beast- good luck
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 07:45 PM
  #4  
SS101's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 1
Default

4" stroke, 4.125" bore, 6.125 rods, -1cc dish piston, .04 gasket thickness, 4.165" gasket bore, -.008" deck height*, 9.240" block height

*estimated, i had to get creative with this one, i stole this # from the lunati rotating assembly that i was originaly going to use. everything on my setup is the same minus the pistons, they're now -1cc dish instead of -17cc dish.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 07:55 PM
  #5  
slow trap's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
From: tennessee
Default

that combo should run great on 93.just guessing not knowing the timing events i'd say your dcr is in the 8.3x -8.5x range.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 07:58 PM
  #6  
Daryn's Avatar
Formerly darynC-10/23/10
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 0
From: gonzales louisiana
Default

you would be safe with 93 octane.. anything higher than a 12:5-13:1 you would have to run 96+ octane
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 08:11 PM
  #7  
SS101's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 1
Default

sweet, thanx for the replies guys, you're making my day here
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 09:02 PM
  #8  
SS101's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 1
Default

woops!! typo!! it's actually 11.94:1 not 11.49:1
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 09:12 PM
  #9  
Websy21's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 1
From: Alberta, Canada
Default

Should be a beast is right, JFI, you can edit your posts
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 09:29 PM
  #10  
Specialized's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by brad8266
How did you get 11.49 with a 72cc head? Explain your motor setup.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/788460-my-engine-build-come-critique-me-compression-components-etc.html

Check out my setup.

11.27 scr/8.54dcr

347 with 72cc heads
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 09:58 AM
  #11  
SS101's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 1
Default

nicely done specialized
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 PM.