Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Worst Heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2007 | 12:46 PM
  #21  
xBROKEx's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 2
From: Pflugerville
Default

Originally Posted by SEBLS1
No tune. Just rough Dyno Numbers OH & BIG THING I FORGOT. These are 243 heads OOPS

well yeah hes gonna lose power with no tune and that big of a difference in A/F ratio
Old 10-17-2007 | 12:52 PM
  #22  
SEB's Avatar
SEB
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: Dallas,TX
Default

Originally Posted by xBROKEx
well yeah hes gonna lose power with no tune and that big of a difference in A/F ratio
So 370 RWHP at 5500 RPM with 243 would be on target for no tune you think?

We are going to install the 241s & see what happens. I was thinking that the car should have done pretty close to 400 RWHP with no tune with Ported 243 LS6 heads.

Does a Tune really pick up 50 RWHP?
Old 10-17-2007 | 12:59 PM
  #23  
xBROKEx's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 2
From: Pflugerville
Default

Originally Posted by SEBLS1
So 370 RWHP at 5500 RPM with 243 would be on target for no tune you think?

We are going to install the 241s & see what happens. I was thinking that the car should have done pretty close to 400 RWHP with no tune with Ported 243 LS6 heads.

Does a Tune really pick up 50 RWHP?
yeah, think about it, you are adding a huge amount more air to the engine without making any change to the fuel mapping. Im suprised he isnt throwing codes and running ***** rich. I would get it tuned before you went swapping out any heads.
Old 10-17-2007 | 01:26 PM
  #24  
ONEBADWS6's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

So you go from stock heads and intake to a ported 243 head and 90mm setup and don't think you need a tune. Your shitting me right. Slap your friend for all of us.
Old 10-17-2007 | 01:28 PM
  #25  
xBROKEx's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 2
From: Pflugerville
Default

kinda shady dyno to, with the only revving to 5500, since stock redline is higher than that
Old 10-17-2007 | 01:43 PM
  #26  
SEB's Avatar
SEB
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: Dallas,TX
Default

Originally Posted by ONEBADWS6
So you go from stock heads and intake to a ported 243 head and 90mm setup and don't think you need a tune. Your shitting me right. Slap your friend for all of us.
I just don't understand why the base numbers where so low. They never really played with the tune. They took the car up to 5500 RPMS & shut it down.

So had they taken the Vinticator cam up to the intended 6500 RPMS & tuned the car. 420 RWHP was in pretty good reach & we are overreacting at this point I take it.
Old 10-17-2007 | 01:43 PM
  #27  
ONEBADWS6's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

yeah spin it to 7k
Old 10-17-2007 | 01:44 PM
  #28  
ONEBADWS6's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Well since a 90mm setup changes a tune quite a bit, add in the heads and yes alot is on the table. Tune it and run it up to 7k. Then get back to us.
Old 10-17-2007 | 01:47 PM
  #29  
SEB's Avatar
SEB
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: Dallas,TX
Default

Considering the Valve Springs are new. Run the car to 7Grand on the 1-2 shift & 2-3 shift. Just worried if the springs will take those RPMS
Old 10-17-2007 | 02:10 PM
  #30  
ONEBADWS6's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

????????????? Why would you run it up to rpms between shifts? You dyno in 3rd gear for a auto and 4th for a M6. If the springs are matched to the cam they can take it just fine.
Old 10-17-2007 | 03:58 PM
  #31  
Asmodeus's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 1
From: Naperville, IL
Default

So.. if I put in a new cam, new intake, and new heads..

I'm going to make less power without tuning for the new combo AND only spinning the motor 1000 rpm's under peak power?

Your shitting me right?

Old 10-17-2007 | 03:58 PM
  #32  
xBROKEx's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 2
From: Pflugerville
Default

Originally Posted by ONEBADWS6
????????????? Why would you run it up to rpms between shifts? You dyno in 3rd gear for a auto and 4th for a M6. If the springs are matched to the cam they can take it just fine.

id do lifters to before i rev that high
Old 10-17-2007 | 11:49 PM
  #33  
Omega Doom's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 18
From: DFW,TX
Default

doesn't make sense for the tuner to only go to 5500rpm and shut it down unless it had maybe some valve float issues or something else maybe? something doesn't seem right?
Old 10-17-2007 | 11:57 PM
  #34  
99blancoSS's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 3
From: ST Helens, OR
Default

Yes the 853's are the worst of the bunch. This is old basic info
Old 10-18-2007 | 02:46 PM
  #35  
Omega Doom's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 18
From: DFW,TX
Default

I would be pissed if a shop pulled the same crap on me! damn how many days does it take to do a set of heads? especially if they need it out of the way?
Old 10-18-2007 | 04:58 PM
  #36  
WOTFMAN's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Richardson, TX
Default

Seb this aint your buddies car man...Why lie. Its your OWN car you are asking about!
Old 10-18-2007 | 05:06 PM
  #37  
BOWTIE's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
From: AUSTIN TX
Default

Well I had some suggestions until i got to pg 3... at this point, why bother.
Old 10-18-2007 | 09:23 PM
  #38  
xBROKEx's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 2
From: Pflugerville
Default

Originally Posted by 99blancoSS
Yes the 853's are the worst of the bunch. This is old basic info
Old 10-18-2007 | 10:14 PM
  #39  
COOKIE MONSTER's Avatar
8 Second Club

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
From: Detroit
Default

Cam and Heads go hand in hand
Old 10-19-2007 | 01:34 AM
  #40  
WS6Drop's Avatar
TECH Apprentice

iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Default

There is a head sticky. The 853's and 241's flow the same. The 243's are better. It really doesnt matter after they are ported anyway. There is nothing wrong with a set of ported 241 or 853 heads done correctly. There are a lot of good ported LS1 castings being used on many cars that make great power.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 AM.