Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

F13 cam, 7.4 pushrods or 7.425?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-2007, 10:49 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Blow03SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default F13 cam, 7.4 pushrods or 7.425?????

Just installed the Futral F13 cam with standard 7.4 pushrods, wondering if 7.425 would quite the valve train down some. Im using the Patriot Dual spring set up and the motor is a standard LS6 motor all stock. Any have any luck with this?

BTW I know how to check for proper PR length just hoping someone had some luck with this to save me some time. Thanks
Old 10-27-2007, 07:30 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Phil'sC5vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,074
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Old 10-27-2007, 07:39 AM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Redlinez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fuquay-Varina, NC
Posts: 2,298
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Most recommend the 7.40 length. That's what I'll be running with my Futral cam.
Old 10-27-2007, 08:29 AM
  #4  
Restricted User
iTrader: (18)
 
socmguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've heard some cams like the lingenfelter performance have a smaller base circle on the lobes so longer PRs are needed but I don't think the futral cams are like that. If getting rid of the sewing machine sound is what you're looking for you'll have to upgrade rockers.
Old 10-27-2007, 08:46 AM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Blow03SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Well its damn noisy thats for sure and sounds like ****. I had heard a few people running the f14 went to 7.425 and it worked out good for them, so just wondering if that would be good in my case? I know the PRC springs are loud but damn
Old 10-27-2007, 08:53 AM
  #6  
JPH
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
JPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

call and ask allan, i'm sure he will tell you. 7.400 should be fine. aggresive profiles, mean noise.
Old 10-27-2007, 09:21 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
mvvette97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Leon Iowa
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by socmguy
I've heard some cams like the lingenfelter performance have a smaller base circle on the lobes so longer PRs are needed but I don't think the futral cams are like that. If getting rid of the sewing machine sound is what you're looking for you'll have to upgrade rockers.
Comp also has the smaller base circle on their cams. My 228 is .040 smaller than the stock cam. I really need the 7.440 but since they don't make that size I went with the 7.425
Old 10-27-2007, 09:25 AM
  #8  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Blow03SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Its only a $100 to see if it quites down and if it does not work then I will sell them here. I just hoped someone was running just a cam in a stock motor and used 7.425 to see what happen.
Old 10-27-2007, 11:21 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Phil'sC5vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,074
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

really it depends alot on if your heads are milled.
if they are not the 7.40s should work
Old 10-27-2007, 12:17 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
GuitsBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,249
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Stock PRs are actually 7.380 not 7.400, so you make up .020 difference there. Going to 7.425 would put you within .005 of stock preload (below stock). Or you could mill the heads .030 and be spot on

Im running 7.400 PRs with heads milled .040, which puts me .010 over stock preload, and im very happy with the valvetrain noise.
Old 10-27-2007, 11:00 PM
  #11  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
ISeeRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chesterfield, MI
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I just put a Lingenfelter cam in my car with LS6 heads with LS1/2 Valves. The base circle on the cam IS smaller and I used 7.425" with the new YT's. Not a sound....It's super quiet.

On a side note if you have LS6 valves they are .6mm longer and should not need anything other than the stock 7.400". (Unless of course your heads are milled or you went with a much thinner gasket)
Old 10-28-2007, 09:48 AM
  #12  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
AFTICA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: W.P.B. Florida
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I have a F-11 in my otherwise stock 98. First put it together with 7.40 pr's because that's what everyone recommended including Allen. It was noisey. Changed to 7.425 pr's and it's almost as quiet as stock.
Old 10-28-2007, 11:34 AM
  #13  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Blow03SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AFTICA
I have a F-11 in my otherwise stock 98. First put it together with 7.40 pr's because that's what everyone recommended including Allen. It was noisey. Changed to 7.425 pr's and it's almost as quiet as stock.
Thats what Im talking about! SO you went with what everyone said and then you just tried a set of 7.425's and it worked out for you. I think I will try this out. What springs are you using?
Old 10-28-2007, 11:54 AM
  #14  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
theinstag8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central CT
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

7.425 will quiet it up.i had a car with a f-14 and needed longer PR. all is well now
Old 10-28-2007, 02:41 PM
  #15  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
AFTICA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: W.P.B. Florida
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Blow03SS
Thats what Im talking about! SO you went with what everyone said and then you just tried a set of 7.425's and it worked out for you. I think I will try this out. What springs are you using?
Logic told me to use longer pr's because of the smaller base circle of the cam, but I listened to Allen and put the 7.4's in. With the SLP dual/dual exhaust my car is fairly quiet and the clattering with the 7.4's annoyed the **** out of me, so for the little bit of money involved I made the change over to 7.425's. I'm using CC 918 springs from a few years ago, not the ones that are having problems now.
Old 10-28-2007, 03:13 PM
  #16  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Blow03SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by theinstag8r
7.425 will quiet it up.i had a car with a f-14 and needed longer PR. all is well now
From looking at your set up you are running pretty much the same thing I am running. This car sounds like **** now that I put the cam in and it makes tons of noise that should not be there, Im going to give the 7.425's a shot. I had a HUGE cam in my 408 SS and that Xer lobes and this car is just as loud, something is not right here.

So nobody has said for sure if Allan's cams have smaller base circle's?
Old 10-28-2007, 06:25 PM
  #17  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
theinstag8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central CT
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

the base circle of a f13 is 1.450. which is the same as a f-14. I believe stock is 1.553.
Old 10-28-2007, 06:57 PM
  #18  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Blow03SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

If thats the case then why would you not want to run the longer rod to make up for the base circle? Thanks man
Old 10-29-2007, 09:02 AM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (29)
 
Evans752's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Logan, West Virginia
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The cams are hydrolic lifters (stock) and the 7.40 are a hair noisyer but car will run better with the 7.40 (looser) but you will get a little more motor noisy but you dont want a stock car when you put a performance cam in a car. I run 7.40 in all the cars that I have done unless they start decking the heads or the block. My set up in my car is a Stock LS6 with stock heads and makes 456 rwhp and went 11.13 at full weight no weight reduction before Fast 90 intake that was with LS6 intake and MTI Throttlebody at Einglishtown NJ. Good Luck
Old 10-29-2007, 12:35 PM
  #20  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Redlinez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fuquay-Varina, NC
Posts: 2,298
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Allan just told me no problem running the 7.425 and it will be quieter on stock lifters, so I guess I'll go that route.



Quick Reply: F13 cam, 7.4 pushrods or 7.425?????



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:35 PM.