Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What's better for n/a engines? Split or equal duration?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2003, 06:43 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
BADFNZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dyess AFB, TX
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default What's better for n/a engines? Split or equal duration?

I'm looking for the best cam that I can run on stock cubes, in an A4, and will work best n/a. I know nitrous users opt for a reverse split cam but is equal duration ideal for n/a motors? Or would split duration work just as well? I'm thinking of going w/ the TR224 112 or the GTP 224/224 575/575 112. But I've been looking at other split duration cams also. Thanks in advance.
Old 06-18-2003, 06:58 PM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
2001CamaroGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ USA
Posts: 4,766
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: What's better for n/a engines? Split or equal duration?

split.....with extra duration on the intake.....

its easy to clear the cylinderswith a set of good heads and headers, its not so easy to fill them due to the factory intake manifold (even LS6)....
Old 06-19-2003, 10:08 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
BADFNZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dyess AFB, TX
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: What's better for n/a engines? Split or equal duration?

TTT
Old 06-19-2003, 01:05 PM
  #4  
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Cal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default Re: What's better for n/a engines? Split or equal duration?

I tried to find out as much as I could about this before I ordered the TR224, and what I came up with is there is a lot of factors that come into it. In a low hp, near-stock engine with stock exhaust a traditional split is probably the best. For a high rpm high hp all out modified LS1 a reverse split is better because the intake becomes the flow bottle-neck. I plan to be somewhere in between these two extremes, so I got a single pattern cam.
Old 06-19-2003, 02:06 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
 
bodhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Deer Park
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: What's better for n/a engines? Split or equal duration?

From what I've seen the bigger the better. It doesn't matter where you put it, just get the most duration you can live with (max RPM wise), lift(spring life wise), and lobe sep. (idle quality wise.
If you can live with a 4500-8000 rpm band, choppy as **** idle, changing your springs every other weekend, you have a STEEP as gear, tall *** tire and a 8" convertor ( or bulletproof clutch), then go with a HUGE cam. If any of these bother you, then choose accordingly.
this is all relative to A BUNCH of other variables, but, like BRent @ TEA said, the stock LS1 heads just keep loving bigger and bigger cams. I remember when a 220 was a big cam- now look at the G5X2 on stock heads.... what next?
I wanna see the guy put a 242/242-.660"-.660-110 on a stock motor
just to see what would happen.
Old 06-19-2003, 07:41 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
BADFNZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dyess AFB, TX
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: What's better for n/a engines? Split or equal duration?

Here's my mods in case that helps.
Old 06-19-2003, 08:15 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
 
Smoke_Ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: What's better for n/a engines? Split or equal duration?

Get the CC-Custom 4 cam from speed inc, it is amazing.
Old 06-19-2003, 08:41 PM
  #8  
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Cal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default Re: What's better for n/a engines? Split or equal duration?

Get the CC-Custom 4 cam from speed inc, it is amazing.
Sounds like a MTI C2 clone, probably a good choice and the right price, but better get some good springs to go with that one..
Old 06-19-2003, 08:43 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
BADFNZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dyess AFB, TX
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: What's better for n/a engines? Split or equal duration?

Get the CC-Custom 4 cam from speed inc, it is amazing.
That's a little too big for me. The CC-2 or CC-3 look a little bit better.
Old 06-19-2003, 08:47 PM
  #10  
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Cal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default Re: What's better for n/a engines? Split or equal duration?

Here's my mods in case that helps.
Since you have LT's ORP's and a good cat-back I doubt you would want a traditional split; I'd go with a single pattern as big as you can live with as explained above. If you have to pass emissions, you will have to limit it to a 224 on a 114 LSA, though.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45 PM.