Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Which would you choose and why 427ci or 440ci LS7?
427ci LS7
8
29.63%
440ci LS7
19
70.37%
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll

427ci vs 440ci LS7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 06:05 AM
  #1  
bluecamaroz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Default 427ci vs 440ci LS7

Being priced the same as long block by some vendors, I would like to get opinions about which do you prefer for all out, NA, FI or Nitrous use. Which will be more reliable?
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 06:31 AM
  #2  
Azrael's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
From: Manteca, CA
Default

As I said in the Gen IV thread the 440 gets my vote on the larger cubes. For FI my bets are the 427's 4.00 stroke would be better suited, although I don't see any problem with the 4.100 stroke of the 440 if you want to go that route. The thing is if you are pricing it through TSP they don't cost anymore for a LSX block and my bet would be that the cylinder bore in the LSX would be more stable under boost/heat and seal better due to the iron block versus the aluminum cylinder distortion.

Kind of like the LSX in your avatar... Of course I am partial because we are currently building a LSX 454...

Last edited by Azrael; Feb 29, 2008 at 06:56 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 06:47 AM
  #3  
bluecamaroz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Azrael
As I said in the Gen IV thread the 440 gets my vote on the larger cubes. For FI my bets are the 427's 4.00 stroke would be better suited, although I don't see any problem with the 4.125 stroke of the 440 if you want to go that route. The thing is if you are pricing it through TSP they don't cost anymore for a LSX block and my bet would be that the cylinder bore in the LSX would be more stable under boost/heat and seal better due to the iron block versus the aluminum cylinder distortion.

Kind of like the LSX in your avatar... Of course I am partial because we are currently building a LSX 454...
Thanks for sharing.

BTW, 440ci LS7 has 4.10" stroke crankshaft. Just a correction.

So, unless FI, 440ci would be better. Also, you mentioned good point about LSX iron block being same price as LS7 aluminum but I read in this forum LSX iron blocks have some issues
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 06:56 AM
  #4  
Azrael's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
From: Manteca, CA
Default

Originally Posted by bluecamaroz28
Thanks for sharing.

BTW, 440ci LS7 has 4.10" stroke crankshaft. Just a correction.

So, unless FI, 440ci would be better. Also, you mentioned good point about LSX iron block being same price as LS7 aluminum but I read in this forum LSX iron blocks have some issues
Duh yeah you're right that was a typo, I was thinking about our motor... I meant the 4.100 stroke on the 440...

The LSX problems never really saw the light of day on the production blocks and GMPP halted production to make sure the problem was totally resolved. The new blocks are due to start trickling out next week to fill back orders and so they should be available soon. If you have any doubts about the LSX block look for posts from Robin L and he should help put some of that asside.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 10:41 AM
  #5  
99blancoSS's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 3
From: ST Helens, OR
Default

bigger is always better unless your going FI
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 10:41 AM
  #6  
SS101's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 1
Default

i would choose the 427 just based on the 4" stroke, FI or not. if reliabilty is a factor, the shorter the stroke the better. but if its not a DD, either one is probably fine.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 10:42 AM
  #7  
99blancoSS's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 3
From: ST Helens, OR
Default

Originally Posted by SS101
i would choose the 427 just based on the 4" stroke, FI or not. if reliabilty is a factor, the shorter the stroke the better. but if its not a DD, either one is probably fine.
If done right there is nothing wrong with the 4.10 stroke, my engine will actualy have a 4.250 ... dont try it at home kids.


WOW deja vu.. you have this quesiton in two sections

Last edited by 99blancoSS; Feb 29, 2008 at 10:55 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 12:45 AM
  #8  
firehawk618's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: Marysville, WA
Default

440ci
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 04:34 PM
  #9  
deuce_454's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: Copenhagen
Default

I doubt you will see much improvements with a fast or oem intake... they seem to be the weak link in building big N/A numbers... with a singleplane and FI.. id go with 440, in an ls7 block to keep the valves as unshrouded as possible
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 04:39 PM
  #10  
Ron@Vengeance's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,628
Likes: 1
From: Cumming GA
Default

We have built SEVERAL 440 LS7 strokers making OVER 600rwhp thru cathedral port heads and ported FAST 90mm intakes. We have one customer with over 32000 ABUSIVE miles on his engine with ZERO mechanical issues.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 04:43 PM
  #11  
NHRAMAN's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver,[KITSILANO].B.C. Canada *WestCoast*
Default

440---Bigger is usually better.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 06:08 PM
  #12  
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,146
Likes: 3
From: Jax Beach, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by 99blancoSS
bigger is always better unless your going FI
It still applies then power wise. You're just running smaller compression heights.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 08:51 PM
  #13  
MrElectric03's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (71)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 1
From: Southern California
Default

When I was looking into a bug cube motor I was told that the LS7 block is fine if you are N/A...but if you try to spray with it the cylinder liners crack easily and an Darton sleeved LS2 block is a better choice.Im not sure if this is true...jut what I have been told.

IMO, if you are going to run a large N02 shot or FI with a motor that big I would see how the LSX blocks turn out and go with that in either 427 or 440 ci.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 09:12 PM
  #14  
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,146
Likes: 3
From: Jax Beach, Florida
Default

^ Wrong. Internet mumbo jumbo. They're plenty of cars out there that have made tons of power with stock LS7 blocks. I do agree on the second part though. The extra 2 bolts per head really helps with common pushing water issues.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 04:01 PM
  #15  
CAMAROZ28AQUINO's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: North Bay, Ontario
Default

i personally like NA but a 440 twin turbo would be nasty as f**k
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 04:25 PM
  #16  
Stang's Bane's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 1
From: Mont Belvieu, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Beaflag VonRathburg
It still applies then power wise. You're just running smaller compression heights.
Not necessarily. A power adder is the ultimate limiting force in a FI setup.

An equal size turbo for example will make more peak hp on a smaller cubic inch motor. ONLY when the turbo/supercharger is moving all the air that it can.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 04:39 PM
  #17  
RAGENZ28's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 1
From: Port Hueneme, CA
Default

When is someone going to make a LS1 tall deck so everyone can have a 500" small block =)
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 PM.