View Poll Results: Which would you prefer?
230/230 .612/.592 xfi/xer 111+2 lsa
11
29.73%
228/232 .598/.600 xfi 111 lsa
26
70.27%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll
Which cam? 230/230 or 228/232
08-01-2008, 06:43 PM
#43
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have the same cam, although I have heads. Mine is ground +1 and I installed it dot-dot. I think you will be very happy with it. I'm shifting at 6400. It is still pulling hard there but it also makes good power in the midrange. I've yet to get a good pass in with it because I took mine to the track with 315 sumitomos and had serious traction problems.
08-01-2008, 09:18 PM
#44
quote
The 230/230 is 60>65 rwhp cam properly tuned and installed.[/QUOTE]
I have a 224-228 114 +4 XER cam. are you telling me I could pick up ~60 hp with the recommended cam ? My car runs 11.4xs full weight with current cam. I will buy this tomorrow if it gains me 40 hp ---- enough for 10s.
The 230/230 is 60>65 rwhp cam properly tuned and installed.[/QUOTE]
I have a 224-228 114 +4 XER cam. are you telling me I could pick up ~60 hp with the recommended cam ? My car runs 11.4xs full weight with current cam. I will buy this tomorrow if it gains me 40 hp ---- enough for 10s.
08-02-2008, 12:32 AM
#45
I have the same cam, although I have heads. Mine is ground +1 and I installed it dot-dot. I think you will be very happy with it. I'm shifting at 6400. It is still pulling hard there but it also makes good power in the midrange. I've yet to get a good pass in with it because I took mine to the track with 315 sumitomos and had serious traction problems.
08-02-2008, 06:23 AM
#46
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
