LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion

Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MS3 112LSA vs MS3 114LSA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2008, 03:44 PM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (-1)
 
c5_ls1_6spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default MS3 112LSA vs MS3 114LSA
Which one will get you down the quarter mile quicker?
c5_ls1_6spd is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-22-2008, 08:45 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
JBIRD02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Orange Park/ Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
They should both produce similar power, but would have to assume the 114 would shift 100-200rpm later than the 112. If thats the case, then it would depend gearing and your supporting mods.
JBIRD02 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-22-2008, 10:25 PM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
 
Nauty99SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Greenville S.C.
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default
the 114 should be in the power band sooner than the 112 , but will fall off sooner also.. power on dyno should be similar
Nauty99SS is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-22-2008, 11:03 PM
  #4  
Teching In
 
geterdone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by Nauty99SS
the 114 should be in the power band sooner than the 112 , but will fall off sooner also.. power on dyno should be similar
Its the opposite.
geterdone is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-22-2008, 11:50 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
JBIRD02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Orange Park/ Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by geterdone
Its the opposite.
Yep, just like I mentioned earlier.
JBIRD02 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-23-2008, 05:33 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Datzneat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Around
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default
Too many unknowns here...
Datzneat is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-23-2008, 06:15 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default
On a stock compression motor + bolt ons the 112 should win if combo dialed in properly (NA)
ie: identical setup

But a 110 LSA will beat them both
PREDATOR-Z is offline  
Reply Like

Trending Topics

Old 08-23-2008, 06:21 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default
MS4 on 110 LSA


/thread


jk lol
WSsick is offline  
Reply Like
Old 08-23-2008, 07:36 PM
  #9  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (-1)
 
c5_ls1_6spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Actually Patrick G helped me spec out a custom cam thats better than the MS3 on both LSAs in the low, mid and upper rpm ranges, So I'm going to go with that.
c5_ls1_6spd is offline  
Reply Like
Tags
Back to Subforum
Generation III Internal Engine
View Next Unread
Compression Test: Manually Turning Crank?




Advanced Search
Quick Reply: MS3 112LSA vs MS3 114LSA


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40 PM.