Generation IV External Engine LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

new edelbrock intake (at SEMA)?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2008 | 12:28 PM
  #21  
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 5
From: WPB, FL
Default

Holy ****! I feel dumber already with this heat soak bullshit. If you have a setup that needs to breath above 6800 RPM, there is no other option. The key is that the intake, heads and cam all need to be optimized to work together.
Old 12-04-2008 | 02:42 PM
  #22  
GrannySShifting's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,944
Likes: 20
From: Glen Burnie, Md
Default

Originally Posted by JJD49
Plastic doesn't radiate heat ? Actually , Plastic obsorbs heat.

Alumimum disapates heat faster then plastic. Any intake that sits directly on top of a motor can and will be effected to some extent by radiated engine heat.
You got me there on wordage! typing in a hurry makes you dumberer. It disapates heat faster... tranfering it fast to other stuff. Plastic doesnt dissipitate heat as well, its not transferring it as well - not radiating it whatever. THey dont make phenolic spacers out of aluminum, they make them out of plastic!

I can tell you this, the metal intakes the car slows down after the first pass bone cold. not so with our current setup. And we use a plastic intake at 7800 rpm, there are other options.

I dont think Wilson would tool up for composite carb style intakes if it werent that way
Old 12-04-2008 | 07:36 PM
  #23  
JJD49's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by ZMONSTER!
Well there you go, youve had real experience and track times. Thing is your running a no bullshit all out drag car, and Im sure the 6000 dollars of intake tests were but a fraction of the cash you have into your car. For me, who would be happy to run 11's, 2 tenths at $400/tenth just isnt cost effective. So if I can get an improvement over the LS6 intake for 400 bucks well thats fine, but to spend 1200 on a ported 90mm FAST just dosent make sense, for me anyway.
I agree. I drive a street car not a drag car so every tiny bit of HP was not important to me. No Need to spend that amount of cash on a FAST. I purchased a Typhoon 96 MM for $475.00 complete with fuel rails and gained a lot of HP over my ported LS2 and received more low and mid range torque then I would have received from the FAST. The FAST might get me a 10th or so more at the track, but WHO CARES .
Old 12-05-2008 | 11:18 AM
  #24  
JJD49's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by GrannySShifting
You got me there on wordage! typing in a hurry makes you dumberer. It disapates heat faster... tranfering it fast to other stuff. Plastic doesnt dissipitate heat as well, its not transferring it as well - not radiating it whatever. THey dont make phenolic spacers out of aluminum, they make them out of plastic!

I can tell you this, the metal intakes the car slows down after the first pass bone cold. not so with our current setup. And we use a plastic intake at 7800 rpm, there are other options.

I dont think Wilson would tool up for composite carb style intakes if it werent that way
They make intakes out of composit material because it is much cheaper to make then forged intakes, not because it runs cooler or flows air better. My car has never been on a track but it spent hours on a dyno several times. NEVER had a issue when there was a loss of power due to heat soak. Even on the street. My IATs always stay in a comfortable zone.
Old 12-05-2008 | 11:29 AM
  #25  
Stang's Bane's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 1
From: Mont Belvieu, TX
Default

Originally Posted by JJD49
They make intakes out of composit material because it is much cheaper to make then forged intakes, not because it runs cooler or flows air better. My car has never been on a track but it spent hours on a dyno several times. NEVER had a issue when there was a loss of power due to heat soak. Even on the street. My IATs always stay in a comfortable zone.
Can you point me to a forged intake??

I have only seen cast or welded sheetmetal ones.
Old 12-05-2008 | 02:21 PM
  #26  
hookemdevils22's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 8
From: Tempe, AZ
Default

someone should fwd this thread to the pro stock community. for some reason, they continue to use fabbed sheetmetal intakes.
Old 12-05-2008 | 04:17 PM
  #27  
06BOMGTO's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: on the edge
Default

Why did I know this was going to turn into another composite vs metal heat soak argument.
Old 12-06-2008 | 06:46 AM
  #28  
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 5
From: WPB, FL
Default

Originally Posted by GrannySShifting
And we use a plastic intake at 7800 rpm, there are other options.

I dont think Wilson would tool up for composite carb style intakes if it werent that way
What intake are you putting on an LSx that is made of plastic and makes power at 7800 RPM? This I have to know as you have found the Holy Grail of horsepower.
Old 12-06-2008 | 09:37 AM
  #29  
JJD49's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by Stang's Bane
Can you point me to a forged intake??

I have only seen cast or welded sheetmetal ones.
My mistake. I did mean CAST Intake.
Thanks for the correction



Quick Reply: new edelbrock intake (at SEMA)?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 AM.