LS3 heads vs LS7 heads
#1
Launching!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Allen,TX.
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LS3 heads vs LS7 heads
So I am thinking about making some changes to my build and was looking to get some input on wether it's worth it or not.
My motor is an LSX 436 with a 242/257 .629/.609 on a 113 ls, hyd. roller cam with Chris Frank stage 2 LS3 GM heads and a Tony Mamo ported Fast 102 intake. I was entertaining going to some LS7 heads and 102 Fast intake manifold.
Would the power gains be worth the expense, my current combo thru a 4L80E made 477 RWHP and 650 RWHP on a Nitrous Outlet wet 102 plate system (200 shot). I know the 15 degree heads vs the 12 degree heads make a difference just not sure and how much of a gain vs money spent if it's worth it. Has anyone been down the same road?
I would love to get my ride (Datsun 240Z) into the 5's, currently runs 6.00's at 115.
Thanks,
Mike
My motor is an LSX 436 with a 242/257 .629/.609 on a 113 ls, hyd. roller cam with Chris Frank stage 2 LS3 GM heads and a Tony Mamo ported Fast 102 intake. I was entertaining going to some LS7 heads and 102 Fast intake manifold.
Would the power gains be worth the expense, my current combo thru a 4L80E made 477 RWHP and 650 RWHP on a Nitrous Outlet wet 102 plate system (200 shot). I know the 15 degree heads vs the 12 degree heads make a difference just not sure and how much of a gain vs money spent if it's worth it. Has anyone been down the same road?
I would love to get my ride (Datsun 240Z) into the 5's, currently runs 6.00's at 115.
Thanks,
Mike
#3
TECH Veteran
Interesting thread that needs more attention..
#4
TECH Veteran
Interesting thread that needs more attention..
#5
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
IMO, going from some properly ported LS3s to stock LS7s is not going to be that huge of a deal and certainly not worth the expense and labor to do them.
Now going to some aftermarket or ported LS7s, I would say it's going to be a decent gain in power.
Although it really depends on how that engine is built and the bore size. If it's an undersquare engine with relatively small bore but long stroke then you might not see as much of a gain as in an oversquare engine with big bore and relatively short stroke.
Now going to some aftermarket or ported LS7s, I would say it's going to be a decent gain in power.
Although it really depends on how that engine is built and the bore size. If it's an undersquare engine with relatively small bore but long stroke then you might not see as much of a gain as in an oversquare engine with big bore and relatively short stroke.
#6
TECH Veteran
I've asked some well respected names in the business this question. They ALL told me the LS7 head is a totally different animal from a LS3 head. I'm not go call no names here but one said the intake valve on the LS3 head is to close to the chamber wall so this is why this head seems to have people scratching they heads at the track from their e.t times.
Another cam guy said the LS3 is the BEST budget head ever for a 4 inch or larger note motor but it'll never catch it match the power output of a LS7 head. The conclusion is that these cam guys is all saying the LS7 head is the way to go.
Another cam guy said the LS3 is the BEST budget head ever for a 4 inch or larger note motor but it'll never catch it match the power output of a LS7 head. The conclusion is that these cam guys is all saying the LS7 head is the way to go.
#7
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
I've asked some well respected names in the business this question. They ALL told me the LS7 head is a totally different animal from a LS3 head. I'm not go call no names here but one said the intake valve on the LS3 head is to close to the chamber wall so this is why this head seems to have people scratching they heads at the track from their e.t times.
Another cam guy said the LS3 is the BEST budget head ever for a 4 inch or larger note motor but it'll never catch it match the power output of a LS7 head. The conclusion is that these cam guys is all saying the LS7 head is the way to go.
Another cam guy said the LS3 is the BEST budget head ever for a 4 inch or larger note motor but it'll never catch it match the power output of a LS7 head. The conclusion is that these cam guys is all saying the LS7 head is the way to go.
The following users liked this post:
Gen2-LT4 (01-03-2020)
Trending Topics
#10
TECH Veteran
So OP you want to be FASTER and dip down into the 5s ..... I would go with a 245 TFS with a Nitrous exhaust port and I say this due to what I've seen on dyno results...
-look at katech 427ci LS7 headed motor they put inside the white 4th gen they built years ago.... motor dynoed 640 horsepower and 555 ft lbs of torque.
- look at some of Tony Mamo/Brian Tooley and Richard Holderner articles on SMALLER 402-416 ci motors... you'll notice a serious cathedral head will be over 30-50ft lbs more torque than a LS7 casting head on the bigger cube motor. I've seen a OUT THE BOX AFR head on a 408ci produced 630 hp and 580 ish on torque. Yikes
-look at katech 427ci LS7 headed motor they put inside the white 4th gen they built years ago.... motor dynoed 640 horsepower and 555 ft lbs of torque.
- look at some of Tony Mamo/Brian Tooley and Richard Holderner articles on SMALLER 402-416 ci motors... you'll notice a serious cathedral head will be over 30-50ft lbs more torque than a LS7 casting head on the bigger cube motor. I've seen a OUT THE BOX AFR head on a 408ci produced 630 hp and 580 ish on torque. Yikes
#12
TECH Veteran
#14
I do not know the exact answer, but as food for thought, I noticed that Lingenfelter does a LS3 head based 427 with I think 11-1 compression. Not sure what cam.... They advertised that motor at 570 HP
Then, they do two different LS7 based 427's, also with I think 11-1 compression.... the one with the smaller cam they advertise at 630 HP. I think that is a 227/239 cam..... (The other motor has a big cam I think advertised at around 660 HP)
Not sure what other differences between the LS3 based 427 and the small cam LS7 based 427 aside from the cylinder heads, but 60 HP different advertised is pretty darn big difference. Some of that might be from the difference in the cam utilized for each, but I doubt if all of it. I gotta believe half of that is just in the cylinder head and maybe even more.
Food for thought.
Then, they do two different LS7 based 427's, also with I think 11-1 compression.... the one with the smaller cam they advertise at 630 HP. I think that is a 227/239 cam..... (The other motor has a big cam I think advertised at around 660 HP)
Not sure what other differences between the LS3 based 427 and the small cam LS7 based 427 aside from the cylinder heads, but 60 HP different advertised is pretty darn big difference. Some of that might be from the difference in the cam utilized for each, but I doubt if all of it. I gotta believe half of that is just in the cylinder head and maybe even more.
Food for thought.
#15
TECH Veteran
Well the bore and stroke plays a role. -A LS3 base 427 have a 4.100 crank I'm thinking with a 4.065 bore.
-A LS7 base 427ci have a 4.000 crank and a 4.125 bore.
Well that's a different there.
Ls3 heads have smaller valves and valve angle....
Ls7 heads are 12 degrees I'm thinking with huge 2.20 intake valves.
-A LS7 base 427ci have a 4.000 crank and a 4.125 bore.
Well that's a different there.
Ls3 heads have smaller valves and valve angle....
Ls7 heads are 12 degrees I'm thinking with huge 2.20 intake valves.
#16
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Ana, CA. USA
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
16 Posts
Head to CAM Match
I believe all will agree that the LS-7 has a "shrouded" exhaust.
The FIX is to use a much greater exhaust duration camshaft, one that you may have fitted at this time.
Another concern is Piston Valve Pocket angle change, the valve will have less clearance, a problem not sure.
Another MAJOR concern is Valve Weight, will you fit a titanium valve ?
When a heavy steel valve is fitted to LS-7, you will lose HP.
If asked my opinion for your "5s" request, I would specify a "dry" Nitrous system.
The second choice would be a "custom" LS-3 style head.
Lance
The FIX is to use a much greater exhaust duration camshaft, one that you may have fitted at this time.
Another concern is Piston Valve Pocket angle change, the valve will have less clearance, a problem not sure.
Another MAJOR concern is Valve Weight, will you fit a titanium valve ?
When a heavy steel valve is fitted to LS-7, you will lose HP.
If asked my opinion for your "5s" request, I would specify a "dry" Nitrous system.
The second choice would be a "custom" LS-3 style head.
Lance
#19
TECH Addict
Is it worth the expense to make the switch to stock LS7 heads? No. Or at least, probably not.
Are there gains to be had in getting new heads? Yes.
I am a huge fan of cathedral port heads, and would seriously be looking at Tony's CNC+ MMS250's with his N.F.I. exhaust port. But you didn't ask about cathedral port heads.
If you can afford to step up to some aftermarket LS7 castings, then yeah, I would imagine you could see some gains that would warrant the expense. If you are only going to "upgrade" to stock-ish LS7 heads, then I don't think it will be worth the price of the switch.
Are there gains to be had in getting new heads? Yes.
I am a huge fan of cathedral port heads, and would seriously be looking at Tony's CNC+ MMS250's with his N.F.I. exhaust port. But you didn't ask about cathedral port heads.
If you can afford to step up to some aftermarket LS7 castings, then yeah, I would imagine you could see some gains that would warrant the expense. If you are only going to "upgrade" to stock-ish LS7 heads, then I don't think it will be worth the price of the switch.