Generation IV External Engine LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2002 T/A daily driver - Actual cost for 6.2 vs LS7 swap?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-15-2020, 12:25 PM
  #21  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
1BadElky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 127
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 440_Stroker
I have a Gen IV block with the 24x crank. It's a 4" stroke and the 5.3 block was sleeved and bored to 4.185. not exactly what you're after but there are options. A custom built engine is NOT cheap but it's doable.
So, stupid question alert : Can I just get my LS1 bored/sleeved to 4.125 and get a 4.00 inch crank and build a "Gen 3 LS7", or is that a bad, expensive idea?
Old 08-15-2020, 12:39 PM
  #22  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,452
Received 1,853 Likes on 1,152 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1BadElky
So, stupid question alert : Can I just get my LS1 bored/sleeved to 4.125 and get a 4.00 inch crank and build a "Gen 3 LS7", or is that a bad, expensive idea?
You would have to dry sleeve the block but other than that, have at it
Old 08-15-2020, 09:52 PM
  #23  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
1BadElky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 127
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Let me run this proposal past you guys.. What if I get a junkyard or reman 6.2L, swap in my LS1 crank with 24x reluctor, and then just do all the gen 3 to gen 4 supporting mods from there? Would an LS6 cam be a good idea to swap while I have it torn down, or would that require changing springs?

At least this way if I need a rebuild in a few years, I will already have a good platform for a 416 stroker if I decide to go bigger.
Old 08-16-2020, 06:30 AM
  #24  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,452
Received 1,853 Likes on 1,152 Posts

Default

That is likely the cheapest approach. Your cam sensor will still be up front and not in the back of the block so you will need to get the right ls2 cam gear - 1x vs 4x.

The ls6 cam is marginally better than the ls3 cam
Old 08-16-2020, 06:33 AM
  #25  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,452
Received 1,853 Likes on 1,152 Posts

Default

1x vs 4x

2002 T/A daily driver - Actual cost for 6.2 vs LS7 swap?-photo854.jpg

2002 T/A daily driver - Actual cost for 6.2 vs LS7 swap?-photo908.jpg
Old 08-18-2020, 11:22 PM
  #26  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
1BadElky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 127
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

So I can get a brand new 6.2 for a decent price - but I hate to immediately tear it down to remove the crank and change reluctors, so is it possible to pull the crank without removing the heads and pistons? ie just pull the pan. mains, caps and spin it to push all the pistons to TDC and then lift out?
Old 08-19-2020, 07:35 AM
  #27  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,452
Received 1,853 Likes on 1,152 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1BadElky
So I can get a brand new 6.2 for a decent price - but I hate to immediately tear it down to remove the crank and change reluctors, so is it possible to pull the crank without removing the heads and pistons? ie just pull the pan. mains, caps and spin it to push all the pistons to TDC and then lift out?
If I were in your shoes and bought a brand new 6.2L for the swap, I would not want to void the warranty to put a 24x on it. The lingenfelter box works great as long as you keep it out of line of site to the headers. heat is what made the thing have a reputation for unreliability.
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (08-19-2020)
Old 08-19-2020, 11:08 AM
  #28  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (9)
 
speedfreak440's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tuscaloosa, Al
Posts: 353
Received 74 Likes on 52 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
If I were in your shoes and bought a brand new 6.2L for the swap, I would not want to void the warranty to put a 24x on it. The lingenfelter box works great as long as you keep it out of line of site to the headers. heat is what made the thing have a reputation for unreliability.
I agree, Ive only had my 24x box for about 5 months now but it has been great and as stated above if something goes wrong in that motor your gonna have a good argument to get if fixed but if you open it up to swap the crank you can forget that.
Old 08-24-2020, 06:24 PM
  #29  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
black00TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 942
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

I want to throw my .02 in here...try to find a low mileage takeout 6.2 and save yourself a ton of cash, and anything you can do to avoid opening the engine up is recommended. Keep it simple and you will have a more pleasant experience.

The 6.2 platform is a superb value.

Most guys who own LS7's won't recommend swapping them into cars because of their cost, and parts not being interchangeable.
Old 08-25-2020, 08:54 PM
  #30  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
1BadElky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 127
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by black00TA
I want to throw my .02 in here...try to find a low mileage takeout 6.2 and save yourself a ton of cash, and anything you can do to avoid opening the engine up is recommended. Keep it simple and you will have a more pleasant experience.

The 6.2 platform is a superb value.

Most guys who own LS7's won't recommend swapping them into cars because of their cost, and parts not being interchangeable.
After a bit more reading, this is the option I've decided to go with. The 6.2 just seems like the perfect all around engine for my goals without spending substantially more time and money. I'll probably post again once I start the transplant.
The following 3 users liked this post by 1BadElky:
bigbomber5 (08-26-2020), black00TA (08-26-2020), Double06 (08-31-2020)
Old 09-08-2020, 03:18 PM
  #31  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
1BadElky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 127
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by speedfreak440
I did all of this about 4 months ago, I wouldn't call it easy as there are a few things to tackle along the way but I can give you a rough rundown on prices and what to expect... I had an 01 Trans Am LS1 6speed and went to an L92 6speed, alot of this Darth and others have covered but I was looking for something in the 475-500rwhp range with good manners that I could beat on at the local road course (Barber) and not break the bank, I ended up with 485rwhp/461rwtq with a somewhat mismatched cam, I am VERY happy with the performance, here is what I did.
$3800 found a local L92 that already had new F-body pan, ARP head studs, untouched ports just light resurface on the deck, already had FULL VVT delete, trays/trunions, BTR .660 springs & "Non-High volume" oil pump (If you get a VVT motor make sure and do this if it hasn't already been done). bottom end was untouched with a claimed 75,000ish miles, I tore it down/inspected everything just to make sure it was as billed, everything checked out so I just reassembled. This motor cam with a new just installed 3 bolt BTR Turbo stage II cam 226/231 .605/.598 113+4, while not technically a NA cam it was pretty close to what I was looking for in a cam even though I have zero intentions to go turbo, it runs hard, made great numbers and has good manners, long sorry but trying to give you the full story....

$1200 FAST LSXR 102 LS3 style + Nick Williams Cable throttle body
$1000 Injectors + All the other stuff you don't think about when going this route Fuel rails, lines, I got a fuel guage for quick ref under hood, I got all FAST stuff which I am mostly happy about the only one I'm not is the quick coupler to hook up to the factory hard fuel line, mine would not go on no matter what (others have had this problem as well) I ended up getting another one that I will link to. - SIDENOTE, even though the FAST 102 ended up costing more than I had hoped to spend I'm still happy I went that route I am SD tuned and having a nice clean 4" funnel going straight to the throttle body is great and had to be worth some power.
$225 Lingenfelter 58-24 box, My L92 had a 58x relucter wheel and I didn't want to mess with changing it so I went this route not in small part because I saw Darth running it with no issues at 9,000 RPM or whatever he's shooting for these days Your my hero dude.... anyway I figured that would work great for my little 6500 rpm motor, no issues so far, it's a really well made product, I just wish a couple of the wires had been longer.
$500-infinity and beyond MISC, this can really go as far as you want but you will NEED injector adapters, cam signal adapter, I moved my MAP sensor to front location on the FAST so I needed an extension for that, I drilled out the sides of the block and did the LS1 style knock sensors + the conversion harness for that, none of it costs all that much but it adds up quick, I also did new LT1 radiator, clutch, pilot bearing, water pump/thermostat, starter + heater hose lines while I had everything out just because the car is 20 years old, I also did a UMI road race Kmember. the list goes on.

All in all I spent right around $7,000 but I did some extra stuff too and I'd do it all again in a heartbeat, you could do it a little cheaper but not much. It's a lot of work but it's probably not as bad as it sounds the little things add up though, I spent a whole day going around the motor while it was on the k member just tidying up wires, running them exactly where I wanted them to keep them off headers/away from sharp edges etc.

Follow up question speedfreak - how is your MPG? have you checked?
Old 09-09-2020, 11:54 AM
  #32  
Launching!
 
indyjps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 199
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

If I were in your spot, Id really consider building a replacement engine - and making the move to square port heads.
Takeout 6.2 is a premium price vs 6.0 that needs built, and youll have a lot of conversion cost to run 6.2 as is.
Build will let you stroke it with 24x or at least change it.
Intake and DBW or cable throttle body is a toss up, conversion to DBW cost VS larger cable throttle body.
Interested in what you come up with
Old 09-09-2020, 01:49 PM
  #33  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (9)
 
speedfreak440's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tuscaloosa, Al
Posts: 353
Received 74 Likes on 52 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1BadElky
Follow up question speedfreak - how is your MPG? have you checked?
I still have stock 3.42's, haven't really checked in the city but it seems about the same(I don't normally check city mileage because it can vary greatly based on lot's of factors, Highway (Interstate at about 78 or so in 6th) went from 29 stock to 24.5 as is, I plan on going to 3.73's at some point, I believe it will actually improve mileage a bit when I do because this cam doesn't seem to like lugging 6th under 1900 rpm after that it pulls cleanly. It's hard to explain, it definitely still makes considerably more torque down there than the 5.7 it just doesn't feel as "happy" as before but I again I think that is just stock vs aftermarket cam, this motor pulls a lot harder everywhere vs the 5.7 & I agree that the LS3/L92 platform has a ton of value.
Old 09-09-2020, 08:14 PM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
QwkTrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 0
Received 399 Likes on 291 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by black00TA
Most guys who own LS7's won't recommend swapping them into cars because of their cost, and parts not being interchangeable.
I have a H/C/I LS7 and it did get pretty expensive. I would never do it again. Boost is cheaper.
The LS7 is a bad little **** though. It will not disappoint in the performance department.

Last edited by QwkTrip; 09-09-2020 at 11:15 PM.
Old 09-11-2020, 12:12 PM
  #35  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
1BadElky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 127
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by indyjps
If I were in your spot, Id really consider building a replacement engine - and making the move to square port heads.
Takeout 6.2 is a premium price vs 6.0 that needs built, and youll have a lot of conversion cost to run 6.2 as is.
Build will let you stroke it with 24x or at least change it.
Intake and DBW or cable throttle body is a toss up, conversion to DBW cost VS larger cable throttle body.
Interested in what you come up with

I'm going with the 6.2 and the corresponding square port heads. Sticking with a 90mm cable TB on L76 intake. 6.0L is a firm no for me because it just feels icky putting an iron block in a car that had aluminum from the factory (boosted might be a different story, but that's not my plan). I'm just waiting on a local engine builder to get back to me on whether I need to provide the 6.2 core or if he has one available.
Old 09-15-2020, 07:46 PM
  #36  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
black00TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 942
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by QwkTrip
I have a H/C/I LS7 and it did get pretty expensive. I would never do it again. Boost is cheaper.
The LS7 is a bad little **** though. It will not disappoint in the performance department.
Agreed.

Originally Posted by 1BadElky
I'm going with the 6.2 and the corresponding square port heads. Sticking with a 90mm cable TB on L76 intake. 6.0L is a firm no for me because it just feels icky putting an iron block in a car that had aluminum from the factory (boosted might be a different story, but that's not my plan). I'm just waiting on a local engine builder to get back to me on whether I need to provide the 6.2 core or if he has one available.
Why having an engine built?
Old 09-15-2020, 11:29 PM
  #37  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
1BadElky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 127
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by black00TA
Why having an engine built?

Getting estimates for both - basic machine work on the short block (with me completing the build) vs getting the full long block assembled and having a warranty
Old 09-16-2020, 08:28 AM
  #38  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
black00TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 942
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by 1BadElky
Getting estimates for both - basic machine work on the short block (with me completing the build) vs getting the full long block assembled and having a warranty
I guess my question was, why do you feel this is necessary? How does that actually suit your needs VS a low mileage stock takeout?
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (09-16-2020)
Old 09-19-2020, 01:36 PM
  #39  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
1BadElky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 127
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by black00TA
I guess my question was, why do you feel this is necessary? How does that actually suit your needs VS a low mileage stock takeout?
I see - it basically comes down to a matter of cheap insurance. Since the swap to a gen IV will require that I at least partially tear down the engine to change the reluctor, timing set, cam (upgrade), lifters, guides, oil pump, windage tray, etc...

I suppose once it is stripped to the short block I could look at the cam bearings and cylinders and assess from there whether a rebuild is warranted, but I prefer having the peace of mind knowing its a "like new" engine since I dont really want to have issues in 6 months and have to drop the K-member again.
Old 09-19-2020, 03:11 PM
  #40  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
black00TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 942
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by 1BadElky
I see - it basically comes down to a matter of cheap insurance. Since the swap to a gen IV will require that I at least partially tear down the engine to change the reluctor, timing set, cam (upgrade), lifters, guides, oil pump, windage tray, etc...

I suppose once it is stripped to the short block I could look at the cam bearings and cylinders and assess from there whether a rebuild is warranted, but I prefer having the peace of mind knowing its a "like new" engine since I dont really want to have issues in 6 months and have to drop the K-member again.
Gotcha, I suspected that was the reasoning.

I quit using reman/rebuild engines in my shop because the quality control is terrible in more cases than not. And since I don't really like swapping engines, this was how I reduced the amount of comebacks from mechanical problems that were out of our control to begin with. I have less problems with factory assembled engines.

In theory new is new, but all of the sudden we have introduced new variables. I think if reliability is what you want, Less is more.


Quick Reply: 2002 T/A daily driver - Actual cost for 6.2 vs LS7 swap?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18 AM.