Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Lsx iron block

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-09-2009, 01:33 AM
  #21  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Isn't the WarHawk a crap shoot.......I've seen alot of threads with problems with that block.

Complete rip-off price either way.

.
Old 08-09-2009, 01:52 AM
  #22  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (24)
 
2000_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Webb City, MO...out in the garage
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS6427
Isn't the WarHawk a crap shoot.......I've seen alot of threads with problems with that block.

Complete rip-off price either way.

.
they've had trouble with the sleeves dropping...not sure if it got remedied or not. what ever happened to the Dart billet block? i saw some pictures of it some years ago and never heard of one actually being used? granted, they're $$$$...but still...
Old 08-09-2009, 11:48 AM
  #23  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (38)
 
03supercobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: edmond, ok
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2000_SS
they've had trouble with the sleeves dropping...not sure if it got remedied or not. what ever happened to the Dart billet block? i saw some pictures of it some years ago and never heard of one actually being used? granted, they're $$$$...but still...
They are out, but they start at 9k!
Old 08-09-2009, 12:04 PM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
jermzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay area, ca.
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Go with a 440. a 454 is unsafe for boost and maxes out your cylinder wall boring capabilities. If something happens you'll end up with a 2500 dollar paper weight.

I was one of the first 2 or 3 to have a 454 up and running on the site. They make a **** load of power and torque, but if I could go back i'd have done a 440. The power difference would be negligable and you'd be safe for whatever you wanted to throw at it.

my 454 made 590 rwhp and 560 lbft with a conservative tune on pump gas on probably the lowest dynoing dynojet in the US.

Id lay the smack down on FI cars making upwards of 650 wheel. so the motor itself was badass... but 14 ci aint gonna kill you to be safe.

im only speaking from experience.

Last edited by jermzz; 08-09-2009 at 12:11 PM. Reason: your mom
Old 08-09-2009, 01:02 PM
  #25  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
35th SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hawaii track track.
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

what your saying would that be the same for n2o.stay at 440.looking to go your route looking at your sig.thanks for the info.
Old 08-09-2009, 01:28 PM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
BigRich954RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS6427
Isn't the WarHawk a crap shoot.......I've seen alot of threads with problems with that block.

Complete rip-off price either way.

.
Running a Warhawk here. The sleeves have to be pressed before you deck the block. that takes care of the dropping.

I like the block but there are little thing that take a little more time with this block which makes it a pain
Old 08-09-2009, 01:30 PM
  #27  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2000_SS
they've had trouble with the sleeves dropping...not sure if it got remedied or not. what ever happened to the Dart billet block? i saw some pictures of it some years ago and never heard of one actually being used? granted, they're $$$$...but still...
Thats right, the sleeves were dropping.

Those Dart blocks are about the biggest waste of money though, they are completely unneccessary for anything we all need for our cars.

I mean we can build 650+ RWHP N/A engines with the GM aluminum LSx blocks and still spray the **** out of them with no problems (800-900 RWHP stuff). If we want to go huge spray and/or 1,300+ RWHP set-ups with forced induction, we have the LSX iron that is way stronger and more reliable than that Dart rip-off.

.
Old 08-09-2009, 01:34 PM
  #28  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jermzz
Go with a 440. a 454 is unsafe for boost and maxes out your cylinder wall boring capabilities. If something happens you'll end up with a 2500 dollar paper weight.

I was one of the first 2 or 3 to have a 454 up and running on the site. They make a **** load of power and torque, but if I could go back i'd have done a 440. The power difference would be negligable and you'd be safe for whatever you wanted to throw at it.

my 454 made 590 rwhp and 560 lbft with a conservative tune on pump gas on probably the lowest dynoing dynojet in the US.

Id lay the smack down on FI cars making upwards of 650 wheel. so the motor itself was badass... but 14 ci aint gonna kill you to be safe.

im only speaking from experience.
x2


.
Old 08-09-2009, 01:38 PM
  #29  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (38)
 
03supercobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: edmond, ok
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS6427
Thats right, the sleeves were dropping.

Those Dart blocks are about the biggest waste of money though, they are completely unneccessary for anything we all need for our cars.

I mean we can build 650+ RWHP N/A engines with the GM aluminum LSx blocks and still spray the **** out of them with no problems (800-900 RWHP stuff). If we want to go huge spray and/or 1,300+ RWHP set-ups with forced induction, we have the LSX iron that is way stronger and more reliable than that Dart rip-off.

.
I wouldn't go that far. They have alot of cool options you can go with on those blocks. Obviously there is a high-end market for them. I think it would be awesome to have a billet block!
Old 08-09-2009, 01:39 PM
  #30  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 35th SS
what your saying would that be the same for n2o.stay at 440.looking to go your route looking at your sig.thanks for the info.
Man, if you're gonna spray an LSX iron block, I think the best is 434ci. (4.155 bore x 4" stroke). Nice amount of gasket and cylinder wall and a nice short stroke for strong piston support.

300 shot....make 900 RWHP.

Or do a 428ci with a 4.125 bore. Make pretty much the same power on a 300 shot.

Let the spray do the work and have a very reliable engine that can be rebuilt multiple times.
.
Old 08-09-2009, 02:22 PM
  #31  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
35th SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hawaii track track.
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

thanks will consider just looking at my options.will be using a tall deck lsx block.
Old 08-09-2009, 02:30 PM
  #32  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 03supercobra
I wouldn't go that far. They have alot of cool options you can go with on those blocks. Obviously there is a high-end market for them. I think it would be awesome to have a billet block!
But why would someone want to spend that money for a Dart block on say a 650 RWHP build, when a regular aluminum one will do that with flying colors? Then like I said above, even if some is going to do an all out, race gas, high compression, N/A build going for say 850 FWHP...why go Dart?

Then a 1,400 RWHP FI set-up...LSX iron would be the better choice.

So where would a Dart block be the better choice over the others...for $9,000 just for a bare block???

All I can think of is a competition road race car, but then the price tag even seems ridiculous because road race cars can use the regular aluminums like the C6 road race cars do, with no problems at all. They're just N/A set-ups.

.


.
Old 08-09-2009, 02:59 PM
  #33  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (38)
 
03supercobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: edmond, ok
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS6427
But why would someone want to spend that money for a Dart block on say a 650 RWHP build, when a regular aluminum one will do that with flying colors? Then like I said above, even if some is going to do an all out, race gas, high compression, N/A build going for say 850 FWHP...why go Dart?

Then a 1,400 RWHP FI set-up...LSX iron would be the better choice.

So where would a Dart block be the better choice over the others...for $9,000 just for a bare block???

All I can think of is a competition road race car, but then the price tag even seems ridiculous because road race cars can use the regular aluminums like the C6 road race cars do, with no problems at all. They're just N/A set-ups.

.


.
I never said anything about using a billet block for a 650rwhp NA build? And why would the LSX block be better for a 1400 RWHP build? Just because it is cheaper? It is also over 100lbs more on the nose of you car? If you have the money, then buy the billet block.

This is coming from an owner of a LSX block car.
Old 08-09-2009, 03:25 PM
  #34  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 03supercobra
I never said anything about using a billet block for a 650rwhp NA build? And why would the LSX block be better for a 1400 RWHP build? Just because it is cheaper? It is also over 100lbs more on the nose of you car? If you have the money, then buy the billet block.

This is coming from an owner of a LSX block car.
The LSX iron is certainly better for strength and reliability then the Dart block is.

I guess if you have money to burn and 100 pounds is really that big a deal to whatever you're doing with it....buy the Dart for weight. Thats really the only advantage there is between it and other blocks.


.
Old 08-09-2009, 03:29 PM
  #35  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

03supercobra ,

I don't really know much about the Dart block....but would you recommend someone use that block over an LSX iron block....for a 100% street car. But one who is going to build a set-up thats gonna make 1,400 RWHP or better as their goal? Just a roll race set-up, straigh line stuff only.

Or is the LSX iron the best choice there.

.
Old 08-09-2009, 04:34 PM
  #36  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (38)
 
03supercobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: edmond, ok
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS6427
03supercobra ,

I don't really know much about the Dart block....but would you recommend someone use that block over an LSX iron block....for a 100% street car. But one who is going to build a set-up thats gonna make 1,400 RWHP or better as their goal? Just a roll race set-up, straigh line stuff only.

Or is the LSX iron the best choice there.

.

Depends on the funds, and the car. I don't want to hijack this thread anymore. If you want to talk about this some more, hit me up with a pm.
Old 08-09-2009, 06:11 PM
  #37  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Yeah, the original poster already has a new LSX iron block anyway.

Just a matter of whats the best bore stroke to go with for his purpose. Tall deck is quite nice to start with though.

4.250 stroke for an N/A set-up would be sweet.

.
Old 08-09-2009, 09:27 PM
  #38  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
LSX350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS6427
11.3:1 should be fine. You can still make great N/A power like that, certainly 600+ RWHP.

What intake you gonna use?

What heads?

Those two things will dictate what your N/A power potential is gonna be.
Yes, I know its the complete combo, but the top end is everything.


.
These are the heads I want to use. (LSX heads) they are one up on the ls7 heads. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_DSforCSEY as far the intake I will go with the Fast 102mm/102 combo
Old 08-09-2009, 09:33 PM
  #39  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (38)
 
03supercobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: edmond, ok
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would go with less stroke, and a longer rod. You want your rod ratio to be as good as possible. With a build like this you are gonna need to buy the best of everything, and use a good engine builder.
Old 08-09-2009, 10:28 PM
  #40  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LSX350Z
These are the heads I want to use. (LSX heads) they are one up on the ls7 heads. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_DSforCSEY as far the intake I will go with the Fast 102mm/102 combo
Kickass heads. Richard at WCCH is working on a CNC program for his ALL-Pro heads that he expects to flow in the 420'scfm, so you might want to look into those too.

Whats the price for fully assembled LSX heads?


.


Quick Reply: Lsx iron block



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16 PM.