LS-3 Lobe Separation Engine Dyno Comparison INSIDE!!
These two camshafts were identical other than LSA & the cams ICL was verified for every test. This is probably the best side by side comparison to date that allows guys to see up close exactly what the different LSA's & ICL's do to the power curve on a LS3 engine.
This is the kind of data that we're working hard to put together for our customers. Anyone who doesn't like the results please don't shoot the messenger, all I did was install the cam & hold the throttle down!


Differences Graph Based on RPM
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
It would be interesting to see the intake duration held fixed and vary exhaust duration to see how reverse split and up affects the power curve. Of course I am just dreaming up more work for you guys.
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Looks like an 80hp gain, w/ no losses??? Nice!!!!!
(If you feel like it..... Open your 111+4 pull, change over to "Difference" and overlay another 111+4. The two 111+4 will lay over as the zero line(blue and red), and then open the rest of the pulls in the same order to align on the colors on both screen shots... Just making it a little easier to read.)
Last edited by SweetS10V8; Sep 14, 2009 at 07:37 PM.

In general, these results mostly fit the conventional wisdom that later IVC and more overlap will produce more top-end power. What's interesting is what's happening here in the midrange. The 113+4 and 111+2 have exactly the same intake events, but the 113+4 has a several ft-lb advantage through most of the range. Lower pumping losses due to the earlier EVO? Or is the additional overlap of the 111+2 interacting negatively with intake manifold and exhaust header tuning? Only cylinder, intake, and exhaust pressure traces would tell us for sure ...
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I've got your 408 and LS3 CNC heads as well. I'm undecided on a cam swap as I still have my cam based on 243 heads. I'm going to the dyno FINALLY on Sat. I wanted a base line before a cam swap. I want to swap cams after the dyno tune. Couple things:
1. I asume with the higher CI in my case would produce some more hp/tq.
2. I assume these are flywheel dyno figures.
My goal is 500rwhp period, with good street manners. I think with my LS3 top swap I'll be close and maybe the cam swap would hit my 500 goal. I had 455/455 before the LS3 swap. I've done the following changes since that dyno run. PRC LS3 heads, TSP 1 7/8 LTs, CR 11.1, 4' elec cutout, new ls3 int stage 2 ported by fasterproms...If I had to est a dyno # I'd say 480ish.
So let me know your thoughts. Cam specs in my sig. BTW John R. specd the cam for the LS6 cnc heads I had. Its still in. THANKS!
These two camshafts were identical other than LSA & the cams ICL was verified for every test. This is probably the best side by side comparison to date that allows guys to see up close exactly what the different LSA's & ICL's do to the power curve on a LS3 engine.
This is the kind of data that we're working hard to put together for our customers. Anyone who doesn't like the results please don't shoot the messenger, all I did was install the cam & hold the throttle down!


Differences Graph Based on RPM











