Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

LS7 427 vs 440 question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2009, 09:51 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
cbr600rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default LS7 427 vs 440 question

Is there any disadvantage of building a 440 vs a 427 using a LS7 block. We plan to forge the bottom end both ways.
Old 10-06-2009, 10:49 PM
  #2  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Is the 440 gonna be a 4.125 stroke x 4.125 bore? Some will say that stroke is too long for the LS7 block sleeves. But if the piston is built right it WILL be fine. My 427ci has the real old LS1 sleeves and it has a 4.125 stroke, and this thing is still fine after 7+ years.

But you'd be better off going with a resleeved LS2 440ci with the new 5.8" long Darton sleeves, alot more piston support.

.
Old 10-06-2009, 11:14 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (31)
 
Pwebbz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denton, Tx
Posts: 1,248
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by LS6427
But you'd be better off going with a resleeved LS2 440ci with the new 5.8" long Darton sleeves, alot more piston support.

.
Agree 100%
Old 10-07-2009, 02:55 AM
  #4  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (25)
 
blu byu EH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: STL
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

440 cost more money then the 427. 427 ftw
Old 10-07-2009, 06:39 AM
  #5  
Launching!
 
Busted Knuckles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Aren't the LS7 sleeves 5.8", same as your Dartons, LS6427? That's .4 longer than an LS3 and I see a lot of 4.1" strokers built from those with no problem.
Old 10-07-2009, 02:32 PM
  #6  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Busted Knuckles
Aren't the LS7 sleeves 5.8", same as your Dartons, LS6427? That's .4 longer than an LS3 and I see a lot of 4.1" strokers built from those with no problem.
No, they are shorter.

I'm not saying a 4.125 stroke won;'t work in the older shorter sleeves....thats what I have, a 4.125 stroke in sleeves from 2001. I have over 124,000 miles on my 427ci and its great. Its does burn oil and I'm certain the cylinders are out of round, but 7+ years and its great.

I'm just saying, if he is starting fresh...he might as well do it right with the longer 5.8" long NEW Darton sleeves in a resleeved LS2. Much better than using an LS7.


.
Old 10-07-2009, 02:34 PM
  #7  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blu byu EH
440 cost more money then the 427. 427 ftw
Same boring work. Its just a different crank. I would think its a MINIMAL cost difference, if any at all to do a 440ci.

.
Old 10-07-2009, 05:42 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (31)
 
Pwebbz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denton, Tx
Posts: 1,248
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The 4.1 crank is $100 more than the 4.0. The problem i remember is the piston getting close to the reluctor.
Old 10-07-2009, 06:18 PM
  #9  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pwebbz28
The 4.1 crank is $100 more than the 4.0. The problem i remember is the piston getting close to the reluctor.
How about a 4.125 crank price?

.
Old 10-07-2009, 06:49 PM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Gordon0652's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,188
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Not a 4.125 stroke...
I am building a 440 and LME did the short block and its a 4.130(5)? bore and 4.100 stroke.

Do the 440 and spray!
Old 10-07-2009, 07:22 PM
  #11  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Gordon0652
Not a 4.125 stroke...
I am building a 440 and LME did the short block and its a 4.130(5)? bore and 4.100 stroke.

Do the 440 and spray!
4.1 stroke....even better.

I just figured he was talking 4.125 bore for the 427ci. Then just use a 4.125 stroke and make a 440 instead.

But yeah, I like your's better because of the shorter stroke. Or even a 4.125 bore x 4.1 stroke (438ci...can still call it a 440).

When my new engine gets done, I'm gonna pull my 427ci out (4.125 stroke x 4.060 bore), I'm gonna have it freshend up and further bored out to 4.125 with new pistons to make a 441ci. Put it back together and then sell it as a newly rebuilt 441ci.....cheap.

.
Old 10-08-2009, 07:30 AM
  #12  
Launching!
 
Busted Knuckles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS6427
No, they are shorter..
Do they measure 'em differently? 5.8" is 5.8", either way. Not trying to argue, just don't understand. I have a LS7 block and don't see any reason not to go with the longer stroke...it's only .100 longer than factory which puts the pin .050 higher in the piston. Unless you absolutely can't spare the .050, there's no reason to go that way.

"Build it as big and bad as you can, or you'll get tired of getting your a$$ handed to you by the guy that does".
...Crusty Old Fart engine builder in my past
Old 10-08-2009, 07:59 AM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Gordon0652's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,188
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cbr600rx7
Is there any disadvantage of building a 440 vs a 427 using a LS7 block. We plan to forge the bottom end both ways.
Biggest question!
Are you going to spray or do some sort of FI? What are you looking to do?

The 427 is better if you are going to boost or going to spray more than a 200 shot if you are going to stay in the LS7 block.
The 440 LS7 4.13[5] x 4.100" in the LS7 is great for N/A motor, i would not spray more than a 200 shot because the cylinder walls are thinner and the piston pin is moved up some which makes for a thinner piston deck.
Old 10-08-2009, 01:10 PM
  #14  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Busted Knuckles
Do they measure 'em differently? 5.8" is 5.8", either way. Not trying to argue, just don't understand. I have a LS7 block and don't see any reason not to go with the longer stroke...it's only .100 longer than factory which puts the pin .050 higher in the piston. Unless you absolutely can't spare the .050, there's no reason to go that way.

"Build it as big and bad as you can, or you'll get tired of getting your a$$ handed to you by the guy that does".
...Crusty Old Fart engine builder in my past
I thouhgt the LS7 stock factory sleeves were shorter than the 5.8 Darton sleeves................

Could have swore there was something undesirable with the factory LS7 sleeves.

.
Old 10-08-2009, 02:39 PM
  #15  
TECH Regular
 
1.8t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alpharetta, Ga
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^ I have heard from a couple of shops that when LS7's start making bigger power, they tend to oval out the cylinders due lack of material.
Old 10-08-2009, 04:44 PM
  #16  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1.8t
^ I have heard from a couple of shops that when LS7's start making bigger power, they tend to oval out the cylinders due lack of material.
Yeah, weaker sleeves is for sure compared to the new Dartons. But also isn't there something with the end of the sleeves like a "bung" that actually shortens the useful length?

Its been awhile, but I remember someone telling me about a problem with a 4.125 stroke in the factory LS7 sleeves.

.
Old 10-09-2009, 02:43 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
cbr600rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Gordon0652
Biggest question!
Are you going to spray or do some sort of FI? What are you looking to do?

The 427 is better if you are going to boost or going to spray more than a 200 shot if you are going to stay in the LS7 block.
The 440 LS7 4.13[5] x 4.100" in the LS7 is great for N/A motor, i would not spray more than a 200 shot because the cylinder walls are thinner and the piston pin is moved up some which makes for a thinner piston deck.
That would be the question of the day . I am going back to NA and my goal is to build a bad high CR engine with out any power adders. Latter down the road i might add a little nitrous to the mix but i would prefer to make as much power as i can NA vs building it for nitrous.
Old 10-09-2009, 05:23 PM
  #18  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cbr600rx7
That would be the question of the day . I am going back to NA and my goal is to build a bad high CR engine with out any power adders. Latter down the road i might add a little nitrous to the mix but i would prefer to make as much power as i can NA vs building it for nitrous.
No spray of FI.....build the biggest engine possible than. And don't worry about the different sleeves or blocks........they will all hold just fine N/A.

The 4.1 x 4.130 sounds like a good combo.

.
Old 10-09-2009, 06:21 PM
  #19  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Gordon0652's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,188
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS6427
The 4.1 x 4.130 sounds like a good combo.

.
With a 246 258 .675" .657" 114 cam! on LS7 heads!
Old 10-09-2009, 09:45 PM
  #20  
Launching!
 
Busted Knuckles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is it possible to partially fill these blocks to strengthen the sleeves like is common with Gen 1 small blocks and big blocks? The sleeves in my LS7 block are basically siamesed, so they do get support on that axis, but is there any way to reinforce completely around the bottom 2/3 of the sleeves without significantly compromising cooling?
I wonder if a fella could get a few gallons of each part of JB Chemweld and grout a block with it? It does have aluminum in it and I swear if somebody put their mind to it, they could build a working small engine out of that stuff


Quick Reply: LS7 427 vs 440 question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 AM.