L92 Head?
10-20-2009, 07:17 PM
#21
Staging Lane
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I assume you mean the price reflects the flow and power potential. Yes it does. It is meant to be a race piece to bridge the gap between the mass produced intakes from GMPP and Edelbrock and a custom sheet metal intake. Think @$1200 complete with CNC work. Check with Cary for specifics.
10-21-2009, 09:32 AM
#23
10-23-2009, 08:45 AM
#25
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Readsboro, VT
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's a similar question. I'm assuming that with the LS3 hollow valves you can run less spring than you need with the L92 valves. Is there any drawback to the added spring pressure? If the car has upgraded pushrods and has the harland sharp mods to the rockers, there's really no issue is there?
10-23-2009, 11:10 AM
#26
Here's a similar question. I'm assuming that with the LS3 hollow valves you can run less spring than you need with the L92 valves. Is there any drawback to the added spring pressure? If the car has upgraded pushrods and has the harland sharp mods to the rockers, there's really no issue is there?
10-23-2009, 05:28 PM
#27
TECH Resident
Here's a similar question. I'm assuming that with the LS3 hollow valves you can run less spring than you need with the L92 valves. Is there any drawback to the added spring pressure? If the car has upgraded pushrods and has the harland sharp mods to the rockers, there's really no issue is there?
