Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

l92 pistions{6.2} in a lq9 {6.0}

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-23-2010, 10:09 AM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
johnster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: jackson tn
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default l92 pistions{6.2} in a lq9 {6.0}

i got a lq9 that needs a rebuild, well could u bore it out and used 6.2 pistions on the stock lq9 rods and crank? would this be worth it? thanks john
Old 01-23-2010, 01:18 PM
  #2  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
baker163's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Antonio Texas
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by johnster
i got a lq9 that needs a rebuild, well could u bore it out and used 6.2 pistions on the stock lq9 rods and crank? would this be worth it? thanks john
Why would you want to go thur all that, just to put stock cast piston's back in it?
Old 01-23-2010, 01:33 PM
  #3  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
SweetS10V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I dont see why you couldnt.
Old 01-23-2010, 01:37 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (7)
 
84BuCkeTOfStEeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Calumet Park, IL
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just put into figure how much you will spend? And is it worth your time for the gain? What is your goal for this motor??
Old 01-23-2010, 01:48 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
johnster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: jackson tn
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

head cam car.... not my dd was just thinking if i could fine some l92/ls3 pistions that somebody pulled out and was just laying around, i could get them 4 cheap. mite make little more power. i was just thinking bout it and wonted to see what you guy thout!
Old 01-23-2010, 06:53 PM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Not worth it.
Old 01-23-2010, 09:30 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
johnster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: jackson tn
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1CAMWNDR
Not worth it.
so u think its not worth the money? or i wont see any more power?
Old 01-24-2010, 06:09 AM
  #8  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,617
Received 222 Likes on 171 Posts

Default

Max you can bore that 6.0l Block is about .060" over..and even then you are going to have to have it Sonic Checked.

I would bore it .030" over if you need fresh bores and go with that.
Old 01-24-2010, 09:36 AM
  #9  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
mark underwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Folks go 4.065 on iron blocks all the time...

It seems crazy but all the blocks that have tried it were fine...
Old 01-24-2010, 11:33 AM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,617
Received 222 Likes on 171 Posts

Default

They are on a timeclock..
Old 01-24-2010, 02:03 PM
  #11  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by the_merv
They are on a timeclock..
In this guy's case, I don't see a problem. He is wanting to use cast pistons anyways, the pistons will go before anything happens to the cylinders.

I say go for it. For a head/cam car, no sense in buying forged pistons when the stock cast pistons will be adequate, if not better suited for the job.
Old 01-24-2010, 04:42 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
johnster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: jackson tn
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well if it not going to hold up then dont guess ill do it but i would like to try it!

Last edited by johnster; 01-24-2010 at 06:12 PM.
Old 01-24-2010, 05:36 PM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
93ls7z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oak Ridge, Missouri
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by johnster
i got a lq9 that needs a rebuild, well could u bore it out and used 6.2 pistions on the stock lq9 rods and crank? would this be worth it? thanks john
John, if you already have the pistons and are looking to get by on a budget, then go for it. We bore 6.0 blocks .060+ all the time and have zero complaints. But once you go .060 (or .065 in your case), that is it unless you want to make it a race only block. In that case you could go a little farther if you wanted to.

Last edited by 93ls7z; 01-24-2010 at 05:44 PM. Reason: added info
Old 01-24-2010, 07:06 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
johnster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: jackson tn
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ok man thanks
Old 01-24-2010, 08:41 PM
  #15  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

If you are not going to forge the whole bottom end, I'd just bore it .030" over and get some good replacement pistons. Going with the stock L92 stuff isn't going to give you enough of an advantage for the work done.
Old 01-24-2010, 09:49 PM
  #16  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1CAMWNDR
If you are not going to forge the whole bottom end, I'd just bore it .030" over and get some good replacement pistons. Going with the stock L92 stuff isn't going to give you enough of an advantage for the work done.
Why not? He said it needs a rebuild anyways. Why not go with an additional 5-6ci, unshroud the valves a little more, all while saving a solid $200 or so by reusing some low mile L92 pistons, which are actually really nice.
Old 01-26-2010, 07:12 PM
  #17  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Because the short block is the foundation for the rest of the engine, you know that. Why build it now with stock cast pistons, stock cast rods with the top end he has now. What, he might see 15 hp now and then have to buy forged pistons and rods (Crank?) later. If he NEVER plans to modify the engine again it would be feasible, but I say save a bit more money and at least put forged 4.00" or 4.03" pistons in it to fit the stock rods and crank he already has. Then later he can buy forged 6.100" rods if he gets the itch for more power. I would just much rather put forged pistons in if I had the thing all torn apart. Machining a block and then going back to a stock cast piston doesn't seem money or time efficient.
Old 01-26-2010, 10:53 PM
  #18  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1CAMWNDR
Because the short block is the foundation for the rest of the engine, you know that. Why build it now with stock cast pistons, stock cast rods with the top end he has now. What, he might see 15 hp now and then have to buy forged pistons and rods (Crank?) later. If he NEVER plans to modify the engine again it would be feasible, but I say save a bit more money and at least put forged 4.00" or 4.03" pistons in it to fit the stock rods and crank he already has. Then later he can buy forged 6.100" rods if he gets the itch for more power. I would just much rather put forged pistons in if I had the thing all torn apart. Machining a block and then going back to a stock cast piston doesn't seem money or time efficient.
Well, I don't think a heads/cam combination is the limit for stock OE pistons. If it were my engine, I'd be comfortable with another 100-150 shot of nitrous before I'd worry about the pistons failing.

I would personally prefer a stock OE piston over a 2618 forged piston in most cases. The OE pistons are very well designed pieces, and can handle more power than what most people give them credit for. Take TSP's "stock bottom end" Camaro for example. It runs 136MPH in the 1/4, and at ~2900lbs, it equates to roughly 570hp. I think some of us older members remember TRMN8TR out running Ford GT's and turbo mustangs with a heads/cam and 200 shot on a "SBE" LS1.

Not only that, but you can fit the pistons much tighter than the forged pistons, meaning much less piston slap (if any at all). The top ring is higher up, meaning less unburned hydrocarbons and less emissions (not that it really matters to most people on here), and better (if only slightly) fuel economy. The super flat, hard anodized top ring land is really nice too, which I haven't seen on any aftermarket pistons...yet.

In his application, I think putting money into a good tune would go further than putting that money into forged pistons.
Old 01-26-2010, 11:00 PM
  #19  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1CAMWNDR
Because the short block is the foundation for the rest of the engine, you know that. Why build it now with stock cast pistons, stock cast rods with the top end he has now. What, he might see 15 hp now and then have to buy forged pistons and rods (Crank?) later. If he NEVER plans to modify the engine again it would be feasible, but I say save a bit more money and at least put forged 4.00" or 4.03" pistons in it to fit the stock rods and crank he already has. Then later he can buy forged 6.100" rods if he gets the itch for more power. I would just much rather put forged pistons in if I had the thing all torn apart. Machining a block and then going back to a stock cast piston doesn't seem money or time efficient.
i see one problem with this, if he buys pistons for stock rods, he cant use them on longer forged rods unless he uses stock length rods and a stock length stroke. if he puts a stroker crank in, you have to use longer rods for clearence reasons.
Old 01-27-2010, 06:35 PM
  #20  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bww3588
i see one problem with this, if he buys pistons for stock rods, he cant use them on longer forged rods unless he uses stock length rods and a stock length stroke. if he puts a stroker crank in, you have to use longer rods for clearence reasons.
Yeah, that is a draw-back, bit I did note in my above post he would need to find some forged 6.100" rods. That was assuming he might not be able to buy a whole new rotating assembly in the future either.

KCS, those are some very good points that I had not completely thought out. I had bad luck with my LS1 stock piston ring land and crown blowing apart and my car is normally aspirated. If the L92 piston is a lot better, which a few people claim, he might be OK staying normaly aspirated. It is just not what I would advise; but I guess that is just because of my experience.


Quick Reply: l92 pistions{6.2} in a lq9 {6.0}



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 PM.