Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

would this cam be ok 4 l92 heads?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2010, 02:33 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
johnster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: jackson tn
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default would this cam be ok 4 l92 heads?

243/248 610/615 on 110

what u guys think?
Old 04-10-2010, 02:45 PM
  #2  
cam
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: in the garage
Posts: 3,389
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

Thats pretty huge. What cubes are you running?
Old 04-10-2010, 02:55 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
johnster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: jackson tn
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

going to put it in a 6.2L
Old 04-10-2010, 02:59 PM
  #4  
cam
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: in the garage
Posts: 3,389
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

Hmm well I just bought a cam for a 6.2L and its a LOT smaller than that. I was advised that you dont need donkey dick cams to make big power on stock cubes and L92 heads. Not sure what your goals are or where you found this cam but from the people who post here who are making big power of late with the L92 heads thats a very big cam in comparison. Mind you there was a guy i saw who ran the GM perf stage 3 cam and it had 27x exhaust duration and he claimed he loved it so?

It also seems that lobe selection is CRUCIAL to getting the most out of the L92 heads.
Old 04-10-2010, 03:01 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
69LT1Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lapeer, MI
Posts: 2,310
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Why do you want to run that cam in a 6.2L?
Old 04-10-2010, 06:00 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
johnster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: jackson tn
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

cause i got it sitting around! its a trex cam
Old 04-10-2010, 06:29 PM
  #7  
cam
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: in the garage
Posts: 3,389
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

I wouldnt run that cam through L92's I dont think it will work very well. IIRC the TRex was designed specifically for stock LS1's through manifolds to extract every last drop of power out of them by working around the stock restrictive intake manifold and exhaust manifolds and even then it was a crazy cam and not very real world usable.
Old 04-10-2010, 06:33 PM
  #8  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
IHEARTLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

you can't just say it won't work. especially without knowing what the goals for the engine/car are. tell us about the combo. you LS people are so afraid of putting cams in your engines. that cam is mild in a sbc/bbc. 110 lsa i assume you are going carbureted?
Old 04-10-2010, 06:44 PM
  #9  
cam
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: in the garage
Posts: 3,389
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

you LS people are so afraid of putting cams in your engines.
Dude Im trying to save the guy some hassle. Sure it will run and yes it will probably make decent power but these engines make 400+hp stock. If he wants to install the TRex he'll almost certainly have to flycut his pistons and put some pretty big double valve springs in there to control it. Also if you have spent as much time as i have researching and selecting the perfect cam for max power through L92 heads on 6.2L of displacement then you would also know that cams big duration and tight lobe centers DO NOT work on L92 heads because of reversion problems and as a result make far less power then say a 114 which most small cube engines make the most power with. With big cubes sure the cam starts to make more sense but otherwise its likely a big waste of time and money to stuff it in and it would be a shame to spend that kind of money on something that probably wont work very well.
Old 04-10-2010, 11:10 PM
  #10  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
pillagenburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If I remember correctly, L92 heads (unless you've hogged out the exhaust ports) require a LOT of exhaust duration in relation to intake duration to compensate for that massive intake valve.
Old 04-10-2010, 11:26 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
 
garygnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,446
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

ask Predetor-Z.
Old 04-10-2010, 11:38 PM
  #12  
TECH Apprentice
 
hymey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Gladstone, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The Trex was designed for a small port head ie, LS1 not to many cams that big will like stock manifolds, clear that up first.

L92s will work with any cam but keep overlap down 0 to 4 degrees, use xfi, or lsl intake lobe, single pattern and wider lsa like 115 to 116, ie 236 xfi, 235 LSK intake and 234-236 xer ex, will make 520 stock heads.
Old 04-11-2010, 11:09 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
johnster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: jackson tn
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

so if i run a set of afr 225 on this short block this cam would be ok?
Old 04-11-2010, 12:12 PM
  #14  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
IHEARTLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol research. does that mean you googled it and asked this website for advice? or maybe you kept playing with desktop dyno? when was the last time you drove desktop dyno or google down the race track?

these engines are not magic. the same basic principles as any other engine still apply.



OP, if you already have the cam, run it. you will probably need to flycut, which isn't a big deal. i have a junk l92 head and a cutter if you'd like to rent them.
Old 04-11-2010, 12:34 PM
  #15  
Banned
iTrader: (11)
 
Josh@PremierAutosports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Memphis
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes it would be ok but nowhere near optimal. Sell the cam off for $200 ish and buy the proper camshaft for your setup. A camshaft is cheap and it dictates how the whole car preforms and acts so don't just slap in a ok cam because you have it laying around.
Old 04-11-2010, 12:34 PM
  #16  
cam
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: in the garage
Posts: 3,389
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by IHEARTLS1
lol research. does that mean you googled it and asked this website for advice? or maybe you kept playing with desktop dyno? when was the last time you drove desktop dyno or google down the race track?

these engines are not magic. the same basic principles as any other engine still apply.



OP, if you already have the cam, run it. you will probably need to flycut, which isn't a big deal. i have a junk l92 head and a cutter if you'd like to rent them.
Stuff it in there and see for yourself and offer up some proof of your own rather than bitch talking and being rude. Theres hundreds of builds with L92 heads on 360-380 cid engines with track vids and dyno charts to prove cams like the TRex dont work for **** on these set ups unless your willing to buzz the thing to 7500+ RPM.

As for what the TRex was designed for seeing as you debunked it earlier dont take my word for it. Take the word of the guy who designed it. Call Geoff ( formerly of Thunder Racing ) and now owner of Engine Power Systems and ask him directly what its designed for and how well it will work on L92 heads

http://www.engpwrsys.com/
Old 04-11-2010, 02:01 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
johnster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: jackson tn
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

here is the deal! bout to get this 6.2L i already have a set of afr 225 mill 2 60cc and this trex cam. was thinking of saleing the heads and going with l92 heads, just cant make up my mind would the afr heads make more power or the l92 heads? {with the rite cam}
Old 04-11-2010, 02:43 PM
  #18  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

This thread has a lot if information in it documenting three years of development using L92 heads on a 403 and finshing with a 427. Four different cams in total, 4 different LSA's (none larger than 113), 4 different lobes series and several different compression ratios, etc, etc, etc. It even has info on running the FAST 102.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...b-c-d-e-f.html

BTW: NONE of the cams were/are anywhere near as big *** that donkey dick you're asking about and all iterations made excellent street power.

Another idea is to contact someone who has had multiple successes with L92/LS3 builds and have them spec you a cam - SPECIFICALLY to your goals. Someone like Shawn at VA Speed would be my suggestion.

Just my $.02
Old 04-11-2010, 04:27 PM
  #19  
cam
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: in the garage
Posts: 3,389
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by johnster
here is the deal! bout to get this 6.2L i already have a set of afr 225 mill 2 60cc and this trex cam. was thinking of saleing the heads and going with l92 heads, just cant make up my mind would the afr heads make more power or the l92 heads? {with the rite cam}
I've attached a link that tests afr's back to back against L92's and the L92's just squeaked out a better number. So considering that the L92's perform at least as well as the afr's and the fact that you could sell the afr's for a lot more dough than you could the L92's it makes most sense to sell the afr's. The main reason you can score decent bucks for the afr's is they will go on a stock LS1 bore where the L92's cannot so there's a lot more market for the afr's in resale. I'd also sell that Trex and order a custom cam as mentioned there are numerous options out there and any of them will get you a cam that will perform far better than the trex and besides then you an tailor it specifically to
your needs ( which none of us know what they are yet. Drag car? Street strip? Street? Road race? All will require different grinds to optimize these goals )

http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...ugh/index.html
Old 04-11-2010, 04:42 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
johnster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: jackson tn
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

the car is not my dd but i do like to drive it, its a auto with a 4k stall, got pro stars on it



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 PM.