Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Valve springs for boosted LSX ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2010, 11:12 AM
  #1  
DrX
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
DrX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 2,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Valve springs for boosted LSX ?

427 LSX pushing 20 psi, 9.0:1 static comp. Morel hydraulic roller lifters, Crower shaft mount rockers(steel, 1.8) Measured valve lift is .630/.640. ETP LS7/LSX heads were equiped with 150/420lb dual springs according to the build specs. Shifting at 6500 rpm. What kind of spring pressures should I be looking at for the rebuild?
Old 11-12-2010, 08:15 AM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
TurboBuick6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 677
Received 94 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Is this going to be a drag race only car? How many RPM's will you be turning? Opps just saw 6500.

PAC's 1530 would be a good choice.

Last edited by badjuju342; 11-15-2010 at 12:37 PM.
Old 11-12-2010, 09:28 AM
  #3  
DrX
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
DrX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 2,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Street and strip truck as per my sig vid . Shift is set at 6500 but it does hit 7000.

If I stay with the current lift, I think I may need to go to the 2.0 installed height as shown for the 1530s (current setup measures 1.8") - A bunch of my valve seals were totally destroyed. The increased open pressure may also help with that.

Wouldn't say my valvetrain is lightweight. PAC says that the small diameter of the 1530s is for lightweight valve trains - how does this relate to spring diameter? What retainers and seats do these use? catalog shows N/A

Any advantages re duals/singles?



Old 11-12-2010, 09:38 AM
  #4  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Looks like something was not set up correctly really.

We have an entire package with the 1521 or you can step up to the Manley spring.
Either the 221435 or the 221436 would work for you. On those heads though, you should be able to run a larger spring. There are so many available that are over 1.3 OD.

Let me know and I can get you set up with a kit that will not leave you worrying. Both of those springs I quoted are close to what you had as far as pressures. The 221435 has some more seat and open pressure as well.
Old 11-12-2010, 09:54 AM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
TurboBuick6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 677
Received 94 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DrX
Street and strip truck as per my sig vid . Shift is set at 6500 but it does hit 7000.

If I stay with the current lift, I think I may need to go to the 2.0 installed height as shown for the 1530s (current setup measures 1.8") - A bunch of my valve seals were totally destroyed. The increased open pressure may also help with that.

Wouldn't say my valvetrain is lightweight. PAC says that the small diameter of the 1530s is for lightweight valve trains - how does this relate to spring diameter? What retainers and seats do these use? catalog shows N/A

Any advantages re duals/singles?
I would deffinately go with duals as you are pushing 20 psi through the engine. We do have a titanium retainer for the spring. It is a mini 8 wieghing 10.4 grams (R532) the seat to match would be the S128. The 1530 was actually produced as a circle track endurance spring.

As far as the 1521 is concerend i am affraid it won't be enough spring for 20lbs of boost. They would work on the exhaust side but intake i would suggest more.

I would not be affraid of putting 200lbs on the seat at all with that setup.
Old 11-12-2010, 10:04 AM
  #6  
DrX
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
DrX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 2,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Definitley very little clearance(.020) on many of the seals at full lift. Not sure what the springs were doing either with the heavy valvetrain and 20 psi. No specs on the current springs other than the pressures. They are 1.5" diameter duals.



Old 11-12-2010, 10:11 AM
  #7  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TurboBuick6
I would deffinately go with duals as you are pushing 20 psi through the engine. We do have a titanium retainer for the spring. It is a mini 8 wieghing 10.4 grams (R532) the seat to match would be the S128. The 1530 was actually produced as a circle track endurance spring.

As far as the 1521 is concerend i am affraid it won't be enough spring for 20lbs of boost. They would work on the exhaust side but intake i would suggest more.

I would not be affraid of putting 200lbs on the seat at all with that setup.
Who is WE? I have some guys running that much boost and more with the manley spring not having a problem. The Manley is what I would recommend and I have everything here ready to go. Or, Like I suggested, you can go with the larger dia spring like the 1.5 that is on there.

What ratio are those rockers?
Old 11-12-2010, 10:27 AM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
TurboBuick6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 677
Received 94 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by John@Scoggin
Who is WE? I have some guys running that much boost and more with the manley spring not having a problem. ?
We is pac racing. I am not here trying to take your customers, I'd rather them go through you guys.

I am shocked that only 160lbs on the seat is controlling 20lbs. of boost.
Old 11-12-2010, 10:28 AM
  #9  
DrX
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
DrX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 2,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by john@scoggin
what ratio are those rockers?
1.8 .
Old 11-12-2010, 10:32 AM
  #10  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I bet a better set of springs are in order. Either the pac springs as mentioned like the 1530 or any of their larger OD offerings with the appropriate seats etc, or the manley set. We carry the Pac springs here (most of them) and can set them up quite a few ways. We also have the Manleys as well. There are so many choices, but spring pressure is in your favor.
Old 11-12-2010, 04:24 PM
  #11  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Keeping in mind the PI/Mast valves are fairly long & heavy I agree a good spring upgrade is probably needed. There are lots of good spring options, but a call to Cary @ PI might be a good starting spot.
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Old 11-12-2010, 06:07 PM
  #12  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

We use a K Motion K800, 200 seat, 500 open, on many boosted applications and their only $93.95 a set. TEA has the retainers and cups if you need them.

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/KMO-K-800/
Old 11-13-2010, 12:11 PM
  #13  
DrX
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
DrX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 2,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

LOL.....Tough to keep up with who's who. ET > PIS > Mast

So bumping up the spring pressures to say 200/500 is the consensus? Better control without too much sacrifice in durability?
Old 11-13-2010, 02:04 PM
  #14  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (6)
 
AES Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Elk Grove Village IL
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Kmotion K-800, PSI CT1225, have used all in LS engines and worked well.

PAC 1371 would work well if you had 1.900" installed height
Old 11-15-2010, 01:11 PM
  #15  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I would have thought that them being an LS7 style head that they would be a higher installed height than 1.8, but I could not find the info on ETs site.
Old 11-15-2010, 01:26 PM
  #16  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (6)
 
AES Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Elk Grove Village IL
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by John@Scoggin
I would have thought that them being an LS7 style head that they would be a higher installed height than 1.8, but I could not find the info on ETs site.
The valve for ET, MAST or LXR heads to maintain factory geometry, valve is 5.450", the tip length is .300". The installed height ends up being 1.770"(+/- depending on retainer etc). Suppose a +.100" valve would make it complicated with stock rocker, and really need an adjustable rocker.

Either that or use +.050" locks, +.050 retainer etc.

REV has something against moving the lock groove on the valve.

Last edited by AES Racing; 11-15-2010 at 02:00 PM.
Old 11-15-2010, 01:33 PM
  #17  
DrX
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
DrX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 2,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Just checked my notes here. Looks like I wrote 1.86 installed height on the intakes which had .030 shims under the seats/locators. So exhaust would be 1.89. I might have the int/exhaust switched around though- I do recall measuring 1.82 somewhere- so it could be 1.83 int/1.86 exhaust.

Last edited by DrX; 11-15-2010 at 01:39 PM. Reason: clarification
Old 11-15-2010, 01:35 PM
  #18  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Interesting indeed. Thats more what I though, but also changes what you will be looking for. Whatever you look for, just get something with a good pressure.
Old 11-15-2010, 01:45 PM
  #19  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (2)
 
XtraCajunSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Been there, done that... The guys pointing you to the 190-200 seat and 500 open are right. You will need that minimum with those heads and that much boost, not to mention the added weight of the shaft mount rocker. I have always had to be very aggressive with seat pressures with Cary's heads due to the longer/larger valves, especially with 1.8 rockers. The Manley 221435's would work great. I've used them many times with great success although the PAC's and others mentioned are great springs as well.

Shane
Old 11-15-2010, 02:06 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
TurboBuick6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 677
Received 94 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DrX
Just checked my notes here. Looks like I wrote 1.86 installed height on the intakes which had .030 shims under the seats/locators. So exhaust would be 1.89. I might have the int/exhaust switched around though- I do recall measuring 1.82 somewhere- so it could be 1.83 int/1.86 exhaust.
There ya go a 1.900 setup with the 1530's will put you right at 211lbs. with a .640 lift will put you about 570lbs on the nose.

keep in mind we can HS any spring to lower loads for a nominal fee. The spring rate will never change though.


Quick Reply: Valve springs for boosted LSX ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:25 AM.