How agressive is this cam?
#4
TECH Regular
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: houston, texas
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have an MS4 in my 383 which is a 239/242 .649/.609 on a 111 or 112. It still really aggressive with the increased cubic inches. Circle D still speced out a 4000 RPM stall for it though.
#5
sounds like a nice cam depending what you wanted it for,, whats the LSA,, id be happy with that cam
#6
its a 112+3 LSA. found 2 youtube videos on it and it sound pretty lopey. just wondering what the power potential is on it....
and if it is equivelant of a 228R thats fine with me, i had that in my car before this build and loved it for my DD. and i didnt have to worry about changing out my valvesprings all the time
and if it is equivelant of a 228R thats fine with me, i had that in my car before this build and loved it for my DD. and i didnt have to worry about changing out my valvesprings all the time
#7
TECH Enthusiast
Even on a 408 thats still a big stick, not a donkey D, but still really healthy. It really depends on the lobes used, what your valve spring life is going to be like though. Those same lift and druation numbers on lobes with really agressive ramp rates could be killer, or with mild lazy lobes could last quite a while. The maximum acceleration and jerk rates of the valve is the key factor in determining valve spring life.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
its a 112+3 LSA. found 2 youtube videos on it and it sound pretty lopey. just wondering what the power potential is on it....
and if it is equivelant of a 228R thats fine with me, i had that in my car before this build and loved it for my DD. and i didnt have to worry about changing out my valvesprings all the time
and if it is equivelant of a 228R thats fine with me, i had that in my car before this build and loved it for my DD. and i didnt have to worry about changing out my valvesprings all the time
#15