416 Heads
03-01-2016, 10:02 PM
#1
416 Heads What do you guys think. Looking at MAST 265CC LS7 heads
and GM LS9 276CC heads. I think I know what to expect from the MAST heads, but haven't heard much of the others. They are cheaper, not sure about power output though.
and GM LS9 276CC heads. I think I know what to expect from the MAST heads, but haven't heard much of the others. They are cheaper, not sure about power output though.
03-01-2016, 10:25 PM
#2
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Posts: 1,825
Received 230 Likes
on
136 Posts
May I offer another suggestion for your consideration.
Tony Mamo Ported TFS LS3's
300+ CFM @ .300", 350+ @ .400" 380+ @ .600"
all from an Intake Port less than 260 CC and a
Much better E/I Ratio!
Tony Mamo Ported TFS LS3's
300+ CFM @ .300", 350+ @ .400" 380+ @ .600"
all from an Intake Port less than 260 CC and a
Much better E/I Ratio!
03-03-2016, 12:45 PM
#6
If you haven't already, take a look at this thread. Lots of information pertinent to your build.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...l-results.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...l-results.html
03-04-2016, 05:20 PM
#10
03-04-2016, 09:45 PM
#11
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Posts: 1,825
Received 230 Likes
on
136 Posts
Wow thanks for that catch Jimbo!
My apologies!
The .400" should have been 300+ CFM
The .500" should have been 350+ CFM
The .600" was correct @ 380+ CFM
These were on a 4.125" Bore.
My apologies!
The .400" should have been 300+ CFM
The .500" should have been 350+ CFM
The .600" was correct @ 380+ CFM
These were on a 4.125" Bore.
03-08-2016, 07:18 PM
#17
Originally Posted by 03EBZ06
Can't get em to answer the phone. Wtf
