Need help picking and LS engine
#1
Need help picking and LS engine
I'm needing help picking and LS engine. I have a 68 C10 with a 383 stroker and a Vortech V2 supercharger (turbo 350 tranny). The engine dyno's 631TQ/622 HP at the flywheel.
Build link:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=358692
Motor link:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=370973
It is really fun to drive, but I'm a fuel injection guy at heart and I want to upgrade to an overdrive tranny (4.11 gears). Soooooo, I'm trying to decide between these two engine/tranny combos to put in my truck:
Engine #1: 2009 Pontiac G8 6.0 engine with 16K miles, $5800.
Engine #2: 2011 Chevy 6.0 truck motor out of a 3500 (LY6/L99) with 700 miles, $6300.
EDIT: Engine #3: 2013 6.2 from Camaro SS (also with a 6L90E tranny) 135 miles $$$$$ .....
Both motors come complete with 6 speed autos and all accessories (price includes shipping). I have a TVS1900 Magnacharger that I will be putting on top of what ever engine I end up with.
Before I spend that much money I would love to hear everyones opinions, pro's, con's. Fire away and thanks in advance!!
Build link:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=358692
Motor link:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=370973
It is really fun to drive, but I'm a fuel injection guy at heart and I want to upgrade to an overdrive tranny (4.11 gears). Soooooo, I'm trying to decide between these two engine/tranny combos to put in my truck:
Engine #1: 2009 Pontiac G8 6.0 engine with 16K miles, $5800.
Engine #2: 2011 Chevy 6.0 truck motor out of a 3500 (LY6/L99) with 700 miles, $6300.
EDIT: Engine #3: 2013 6.2 from Camaro SS (also with a 6L90E tranny) 135 miles $$$$$ .....
Both motors come complete with 6 speed autos and all accessories (price includes shipping). I have a TVS1900 Magnacharger that I will be putting on top of what ever engine I end up with.
Before I spend that much money I would love to hear everyones opinions, pro's, con's. Fire away and thanks in advance!!
Last edited by Hart_Rod; 12-30-2012 at 09:24 AM.
#4
I thought about going that route, but do not want to hassle with rebuilding anything and I really like the idea of the 6 speed. Plus, I need the square port heads because that's what my supercharger is set up for.
Trending Topics
#9
EDIT: I'm going to throw a 3rd engine in here, a 2013 6.2 from Camaro SS (also with a 6L90E tranny).....
#10
"Why would the supercharger preclude using the VVT?"
The VVT changes the cam timing so the volumetric efficiency is better at lower rpms while still maintaining good horsepower numbers at high rpm. With a supercharger forcing the air into the chamber you don't need it. So keep it simple. Just pick the right camshaft for your setup. The iron block is a little stronger plus it has lower milage for just a little more money which was the main factor in my choice.
Now that you have brought in the L99 motor that complicates things. That is essentially what I am putting in my 1965 Buick Skylark.
The VVT changes the cam timing so the volumetric efficiency is better at lower rpms while still maintaining good horsepower numbers at high rpm. With a supercharger forcing the air into the chamber you don't need it. So keep it simple. Just pick the right camshaft for your setup. The iron block is a little stronger plus it has lower milage for just a little more money which was the main factor in my choice.
Now that you have brought in the L99 motor that complicates things. That is essentially what I am putting in my 1965 Buick Skylark.
#12
"Why would the supercharger preclude using the VVT?"
The VVT changes the cam timing so the volumetric efficiency is better at lower rpms while still maintaining good horsepower numbers at high rpm. With a supercharger forcing the air into the chamber you don't need it. So keep it simple. Just pick the right camshaft for your setup. The iron block is a little stronger plus it has lower milage for just a little more money which was the main factor in my choice.
Now that you have brought in the L99 motor that complicates things. That is essentially what I am putting in my 1965 Buick Skylark.
The VVT changes the cam timing so the volumetric efficiency is better at lower rpms while still maintaining good horsepower numbers at high rpm. With a supercharger forcing the air into the chamber you don't need it. So keep it simple. Just pick the right camshaft for your setup. The iron block is a little stronger plus it has lower milage for just a little more money which was the main factor in my choice.
Now that you have brought in the L99 motor that complicates things. That is essentially what I am putting in my 1965 Buick Skylark.
I hear that! I think I have it sold and am leaning towards the truck motor. It doesn't have AFM, so one less thing to worry about.....
Last edited by Hart_Rod; 12-31-2012 at 10:52 AM.
#15
http://s852.beta.photobucket.com/use...65363290758454
Ok, well after a lot of thought and questions, I'm going with the 6.2/6L80E out of the Camaro SS. I think this will be the best bang for the buck and allow for some good upgrades in the future. I plan on deleteing the AFM and the VVT, anyone have an idea on the the cost of that? Also, I would like to change the transmission output shaft to allow for a regular driveshaft yoke, anyone have a cost on this upgrade? Thanks in advance!
#17
Ok, I picked up a 2013 L99/6L80E out of a Camaro SS with only 135 miles! (pics to follow) I have a couple of questions, where should I purchase the AFM/VVT delete from as well as the cam? How much is the factory cam and lifers worth? How much is the complete intake worth with all the injectors? Once again, only 135 miles, . Thanks in advance.