Aluminum 454 Build
I have the best small block na racer in the country that helps me with ideas. We were on his Dyno and help told me it needs more cylinder head and cam. I have limitations on the cam that keep me from getting crazy.
I would have a set of 305 next week if I had $5000 to spend.
The only way I would have a Holley high ram is if it had two 4500 tb on it. But it will not fit under a hood I can see over.
compare apples to apples
Tim
I have the best small block na racer in the country that helps me with ideas. We were on his Dyno and help told me it needs more cylinder head and cam. I have limitations on the cam that keep me from getting crazy.
I would have a set of 305 next week if I had $5000 to spend.
The only way I would have a Holley high ram is if it had two 4500 tb on it. But it will not fit under a hood I can see over.
compare apples to apples
Tim

BTW - we can go solid roller and more porting you know.

Ed
Kuntz is probably the best guy in the country with Hot Street heads, but not with hydraulic roller heads?
The fastest hydraulic roller cam'd LSX in the country has "little" TFS 245's on it and has run 8.92 @ 150 on motor, no power adders. He's #10 on the fastest N/A list.
10) 8.92 @ 150.50-- 430in-- Coleman Roddy-- 3070#-- Hyd-- T/F Cathedral
If the "biggest" head always made the most power and ran the fastest, then why doesn't NHRA Pro Stock use the biggest heads they can find?
I'm not disputing that Tim's heads are holding him back, but it's not because they're not BIG enough, it's because they're not EFFICIENT enough.
If more hydraulic roller guys would take what a cylinder head flows at .300"-.500", plug those numbers in to a coefficient of discharge calculator, and then develop the smallest port they can with the highest C of D numbers, then they would have FASTER heads.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
A engine that has to go down the road without chewing up parts is different than something that has to last 100 passes.
Like I said if I put a much more aggressive cam in it and turned it harder more compression it would run better.
That stuff is not a option so the heads have to be better.
Apples to apples
Tim
A engine that has to go down the road without chewing up parts is different than something that has to last 100 passes.
Like I said if I put a much more aggressive cam in it and turned it harder more compression it would run better.
That stuff is not a option so the heads have to be better.
Apples to apples
Tim
You don't have to run .700+ lift to make good power with a hydraulic roller cam.
We turn these types of cams 7800 RPM with stock rockers and don't chew up any parts.
Brian
So Brian, I will make more power with the 285's as opposed to the 305's? I won't mind having an "aggressive" or "big" cam, as the ITB should make a more agressive cam seem more mild on the street from what I have been able to figure out.
Brian, would you be able to expand on the coefficient of discharge calculation? Being a mechanical engineering student I am very interested in the engineering behind stuff like this...
Hopefully I can get a job in the automotive world for when I graduate in May.
Thanks again for the input!
Curtain area is simply valve diameter times pi
We strive for minimal C of D at .100" lift but for a hydraulic roller street car we want maximum C of D from .300"-.500"
This is why heads like the TFS 225 made for a 4" bore ended up with a 2.055" intake valve as opposed to a 2.08" like our competition was using. The smaller valve actually flowed more air at .400" than a 2.08" valve. When a larger valve flows less air at .400" lift it's a double loser for a street head. The TFS 225 heads seem to consistently make great power on 4" bore LS2 engines. In back to back engine dyno testing the competitors heads with 2.08" valves were 20 hp behind the TFS 225 heads with the smaller 2.055" valves.
If the 305 heads have a larger intake valve than the 285 heads, but flows about the same through the midlift, then I'll take the 285 heads 99% of the time. With the exception being when a large shot of nitrous is being used. Nitrous displaces air so more port volume is needed.
I am definitely not going to do any nitrous any time soon so it looks like the 285's are going to be my best bet, like you have told me multiple times haha...
Is there any benefit to doing any port work or polishing on the 285's?
Here are my plans as of now for the heads.
-Mast 285cc Bare heads
-Titanium Intake Valves
-Inconel or Hollow Stem Exhaust Valves
-BTR PAC .700" lift spring kit with Ti Retainers
As for the other parts I need...
-Some sort of link-bar lifters, thinking either Morel or Isky
-3/8 chromoly pushrods
-Comp LS3 Hex-A-Just timing set
-LS3 Timing Cover
-Oil pump....Debating between Melling 10296 and 10295, or a ported LS6 pump
-Custom Ground LS3 Cam....Specs to be determined
-ARP Head Stud Kit
And finally a new set of sensors
-Cam Position
-Crank Position
-2 Knock Sensors
-Oil Pressure
-Coolant Temp
-Map
-IAT
So is there anything I am forgetting here?
Dyou have any input on lifters? Thinking morel or Isky...
On a percentage basis we've had the least issues with the GM LS7 lifters. Maybe that's because when someone has an issue they don't call so therefore we don't know.
We've had the most issues with the most expensive lifters we sell, that may be because they get scrutinized to death.
We're currently looking at the Johnson link bar lifters hoping the quality will be 100% consistent. Evidently that's what GMPP is using on the COPO cars.
On a percentage basis we've had the least issues with the GM LS7 lifters. Maybe that's because when someone has an issue they don't call so therefore we don't know.
We've had the most issues with the most expensive lifters we sell, that may be because they get scrutinized to death.
We're currently looking at the Johnson link bar lifters hoping the quality will be 100% consistent. Evidently that's what GMPP is using on the COPO cars.


