Ls3 418 hates the street Help
I mean, does it mean THAT MUCH to you that he does what you say he ought to do?????
KW
Give it a month.
"My new cam makes no power, and my car still drives like ****, HELP"
.Often times, people step into a huge pile of crap because they put a big-assed cam into a stroker just because it was a stroker.
KW
Now if the car was an auto with a 4000 rpm stall convertor, then you can use a much larger cam compared to a manual trans.
For the OP's car, I would go with a Cam Motion 226/242/.620/.600 115+4 cam. This cam will make very good power in a LS3 418, and have very nice manners.
Russ Kemp

Much happier
But then again I am just an idiot with my money

Have fun! Be safe!!
KW

I went through a similar swap and only lost peak HP, but gained 50 ftlbs of torque in the bottom end going from a 241/251 112 to a 231/239 115:
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
OP, I would suggest keeping the bigger cam and OPTIMIZE tuning. I guarantee it will be more fun to drive, as well as it will keep pulling on the big end revving from 2500-6500 rpm. Just my 2 cents, but what do I know.GL
OP, I would suggest keeping the bigger cam and OPTIMIZE tuning. I guarantee it will be more fun to drive, as well as it will keep pulling on the big end revving from 2500-6500 rpm. Just my 2 cents, but what do I know.GL
I had drivability issues out the *** with that larger cam and hated driving the car. The car is 100% more fun to drive with the cam I have now.
My car made 565 RWHP and 510 RWTQ NA thru a M6, 12 both 4:30 gear, 28' MT drag slick.
Message me if you have any questions
I would expect you could add 8-12 degrees more overlap in a 418 and it'd still drive similar to what I have based on the cubic inches.
This falls under the same flawed theory that says; 'with essentially no other changes except cubic inches, a 'bigger' cam can be used....and the more cubic inches, the 'bigger' the cam'.
That's a good method for NOT optimizing and engine.
KW








