ITB's on a 416Ci and cam LSA??
I have asked two respected guys for a cam on my 416Ci, and the duration has been very similar 239/248 118+3, and the other 246/250 110+2, but the LSA is very different, can anyone tell me which one would do what?
The Itb's can idle alot better than single plane, and will run smoother on cruise settings, thanks to lack of cross contamination.
The 239*/248* cam is gonna have about 7* of valve overlap. Means the engine will have some noticeable but not unmanageable lope. Peak torque will be between 4500 to 5000 RPMs and it's hold good torque right up to the 6000 RPM range. Peak HP will be very close to 6500 RPMs. This cam will make for a real good track runner while being VERY streetable.
The 246*/250* cam will have 28* of valve overlap. It's torque curve will be less broad and will have more peak than the 239* cam. It will have a very rough idle.....even with a good tune. It should make more peak HP and TQ than the 239* cam and it's power will tilt more towards the top end of the RPM curve. This cam will be much more race oriented. You will still be able to drive the car on the street, but you're gonna have to put in work to do so.
IMHO......of course.
BTW.....what's your compression ratio gonna be?
KW
Trending Topics




Characteristics. I like the 239* Intake Duration with either TFS 245 or
MMS 235 W/NFI (also available with TFS) + 6-8* Exhaust will be more than
Enough for 7000 RPM with those exhaust ports. So 239/245 on a 114*+3* LSA. Overlap something Between 10-12* very easy to tune will get much better mileage than 246/250 110+ 2, and perform better all the way around with your light Car than either cam. I would expect 560-580 RWHP, Maybe +15-20 more with the ITB Manifold.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
NOW, I agree with your "tech" and your cam choice (246/250) with even a 108 C/L being better. (@Split Overlap)
This will IDLE at 400 RPM if "sync" is balanced well. (little chop)
My ITB Bore is 65mm with that HP of 650-700 (bench) with the same specs as your engine expected.
What is your ITB bore ?
I could provide a Crower Camshaft ?
Nice car, your TVR.
Send us a picture
Lance
NOW, I agree with your "tech" and your cam choice (246/250) with even a 108 C/L being better. (@Split Overlap)
This will IDLE at 400 RPM if "sync" is balanced well. (little chop)
My ITB Bore is 65mm with that HP of 650-700 (bench) with the same specs as your engine expected.
What is your ITB bore ?
I could provide a Crower Camshaft ?
Nice car, your TVR.
Send us a picture
Lance
I have 55mm chokes, its a real effort to set up just of idle, the split second you rest a toenail on the throttle it has to sense movement, all those chokes all of a sudden let in alot of air, yours even more so, otherwise it goes weak.
But yes it can idle down to 500rpm and be smooth still.
Thanks for the comments!
Paul.




55 MM ITB is in OPs signature.
Currently making 530 RWHP and wanted more power and better
Efficiency. (Suspect dual purpose Street/Track) With a HR &
~7000 RPM & Super Efficient Heads mentioned wouldn't an
Overlap range of 12-20* be ideal VS 28-30*? I Know the
Tuning ability with ITBs can handle much greater Overlap
VS Single Plane or Plastic Style but aside from the cool
400 RPM Idle and chop it would produce is there any
Trade off. BTW 560-600 RWHP is pretty close to
650-700 Bench/(Flywheel?)through a Manual Trans.
BTW Where is the Garbage?
The primary tube diameter(s) and length, if known by myself, could then be matched to the intake diameter/length (???) better by a camshaft specification.
My ECU-882C has a fuel object that works well with ITB's, a enrichement based on SUDDEN RPM increase.
What is you ECM/Tuners Tool ?
Can you adjust the Injection Angle ?
Lance
The 239*/248* cam is gonna have about 7* of valve overlap. Means the engine will have some noticeable but not unmanageable lope. Peak torque will be between 4500 to 5000 RPMs and it's hold good torque right up to the 6000 RPM range. Peak HP will be very close to 6500 RPMs. This cam will make for a real good track runner while being VERY streetable.
The 246*/250* cam will have 28* of valve overlap. It's torque curve will be less broad and will have more peak than the 239* cam. It will have a very rough idle.....even with a good tune. It should make more peak HP and TQ than the 239* cam and it's power will tilt more towards the top end of the RPM curve. This cam will be much more race oriented. You will still be able to drive the car on the street, but you're gonna have to put in work to do so.
IMHO......of course.
BTW.....what's your compression ratio gonna be?
KW
? I ran a 259/277 in a 430 on the street with a hi-ram. That thing will idle like a stock cam with ITBs.
Go plug this into you CPU what does 260/272 with .730 do in a 408 @ around 11.8 comp. with Factory Ls3 heads do to you or your groupies. That's my junk yard build. Guru. I think you figure with the $ you've spent makes you a Guru or the next best thing since sliced cheese. If so then in the cheese world I must be smoked gouda. I'll be Your the garbage boy.
Asymmetrical roller cam do you even know or heard of this Cam guru's? I got you LANCE.
Last edited by Patron; Nov 14, 2017 at 07:37 AM.
I have created Inverse Radius Roller Lobes, NO PROBLEM.
My guess is you think I am on Mushrooms, my cams, as they will SLAP a lifter with MUCH GREATER ACCELERATION then a roller.
NOW your question IS A SIMPLE Maths report 239/246 IN Lobe.
THE 239 WILL CLOSE the Inlet valve @ .050" with 54.5*
THE 249 WILL CLOSE the Inlet Valve @ .050" with 51*
THUS Patron, I agree with you, a better report followed by more engine specification required could be provided.
Lance
402 ITB 700 hp 2009 Ls1tech I've read all the pages on this site. The good one's are Bookmarked.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...d-700-1hp.html
Its 1.75" and i have to dent one of those to squeeze it past the chassis, the headers are 10 years old now, scruffy but they have no holes!
Last edited by Patron; Nov 14, 2017 at 01:06 PM.

