Projekt Lazarus - Numbers Posted!!
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 10,451
Likes: 1,872
From: My own internal universe
Having two timing tables similar to GM has helped my low speed drivability a ton. I treat the base timing table like the GM high octane table. And then added a custom 2D table to modify spark timing at very low throttle conditions (pull timing at 0% TPS in my case, which also helps engine coast down to idle).
My low & no throttle conditions were basically overlapping below 2000 rpm so it was impossible to make both happy and my engine was bucking. Being able to command different timing based on TPS has helped a lot.
Got the idea from a guy on the Holley forums by the name of quarterbooty
My low & no throttle conditions were basically overlapping below 2000 rpm so it was impossible to make both happy and my engine was bucking. Being able to command different timing based on TPS has helped a lot.
Got the idea from a guy on the Holley forums by the name of quarterbooty
Having two timing tables similar to GM has helped my low speed drivability a ton. I treat the base timing table like the GM high octane table. And then added a custom 2D table to modify spark timing at very low throttle conditions (pull timing at 0% TPS in my case, which also helps engine coast down to idle).
My low & no throttle conditions were basically overlapping below 2000 rpm so it was impossible to make both happy and my engine was bucking. Being able to command different timing based on TPS has helped a lot.
Got the idea from a guy on the Holley forums by the name of quarterbooty
My low & no throttle conditions were basically overlapping below 2000 rpm so it was impossible to make both happy and my engine was bucking. Being able to command different timing based on TPS has helped a lot.
Got the idea from a guy on the Holley forums by the name of quarterbooty
Do you have cable throttle body with IAC, or drive-by-wire?
Darth,
Turn the learn function off. In theory it's good, and one of Holley's main selling points, but it will cause all sorts of problems and will make your VE table jacked, especially if your cam is of the donkey dick variety.
I turn learn off, and tighten up the limits on compensation to a reasonable amount. Starting out probably +/- 25% either way then tune your VE table off that using the data logger.
Big cam stuff I normally run open loop at idle and just off idle or really tighten up the compensation limits.
With a reversion at and off idle, it will make the WB02 nuts and will start adding/pulling fuel when it doesn't actually need to.
The IAC settings are pretty basic, which is good and bad. I know a lot of people would like an advanced IAC section. I know some people have created custom ICF's to help control the IAC but that is beyond my knowledge level at this point.
Getting the parked IAC position and ramp down rpm is really important.
Turn the learn function off. In theory it's good, and one of Holley's main selling points, but it will cause all sorts of problems and will make your VE table jacked, especially if your cam is of the donkey dick variety.
I turn learn off, and tighten up the limits on compensation to a reasonable amount. Starting out probably +/- 25% either way then tune your VE table off that using the data logger.
Big cam stuff I normally run open loop at idle and just off idle or really tighten up the compensation limits.
With a reversion at and off idle, it will make the WB02 nuts and will start adding/pulling fuel when it doesn't actually need to.
The IAC settings are pretty basic, which is good and bad. I know a lot of people would like an advanced IAC section. I know some people have created custom ICF's to help control the IAC but that is beyond my knowledge level at this point.
Getting the parked IAC position and ramp down rpm is really important.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 10,451
Likes: 1,872
From: My own internal universe
SO..... You can edit the axes! I'm going to do something really stupid like first line is 15 kpa, second line is 50 kpa. Then I get tons of resolution between 50 and 100 kps.
Yeah you can make it however you want. Just make sure you do the same for the spark table so they match.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 10,451
Likes: 1,872
From: My own internal universe
LOL. I was just scrolling through, because I wasn't even sure. I may go back and edit post 1 to make it easier.
Here's the short version:
4.185 x 4.000 RED sleeved LS7 race block (unicorn GM block, kinda cool)
Molnar crank and rods
JE pistons
12.8:1 compression. 9.2 dynamic compression
256/270-114+4 solid roller cam. .747/.729 lifts
YT pros with 10mm bolt upgrade
Mamo Ls7 heads (same heads in post 1)
Isky lifters
Magnum F transmission
RPS clutch
the rest is probably less important, but let me know if there's anything you're interested to know.
My numbers on the motor before I took the heads off again to patch was 693 hp. I'll try to find the dyno chart and repost if needed. Was a pretty cool test, since we did bias ply and radials. showed about 20 hp gain on radials.
Here's the short version:
4.185 x 4.000 RED sleeved LS7 race block (unicorn GM block, kinda cool)
Molnar crank and rods
JE pistons
12.8:1 compression. 9.2 dynamic compression
256/270-114+4 solid roller cam. .747/.729 lifts
YT pros with 10mm bolt upgrade
Mamo Ls7 heads (same heads in post 1)
Isky lifters
Magnum F transmission
RPS clutch
the rest is probably less important, but let me know if there's anything you're interested to know.
My numbers on the motor before I took the heads off again to patch was 693 hp. I'll try to find the dyno chart and repost if needed. Was a pretty cool test, since we did bias ply and radials. showed about 20 hp gain on radials.
LOL. I was just scrolling through, because I wasn't even sure. I may go back and edit post 1 to make it easier.
Here's the short version:
4.185 x 4.000 RED sleeved LS7 race block (unicorn GM block, kinda cool)
Molnar crank and rods
JE pistons
12.8:1 compression. 9.2 dynamic compression
256/270-114+4 solid roller cam. .747/.729 lifts
YT pros with 10mm bolt upgrade
Mamo Ls7 heads (same heads in post 1)
Isky lifters
Magnum F transmission
RPS clutch
the rest is probably less important, but let me know if there's anything you're interested to know.
My numbers on the motor before I took the heads off again to patch was 693 hp. I'll try to find the dyno chart and repost if needed. Was a pretty cool test, since we did bias ply and radials. showed about 20 hp gain on radials.
Here's the short version:
4.185 x 4.000 RED sleeved LS7 race block (unicorn GM block, kinda cool)
Molnar crank and rods
JE pistons
12.8:1 compression. 9.2 dynamic compression
256/270-114+4 solid roller cam. .747/.729 lifts
YT pros with 10mm bolt upgrade
Mamo Ls7 heads (same heads in post 1)
Isky lifters
Magnum F transmission
RPS clutch
the rest is probably less important, but let me know if there's anything you're interested to know.
My numbers on the motor before I took the heads off again to patch was 693 hp. I'll try to find the dyno chart and repost if needed. Was a pretty cool test, since we did bias ply and radials. showed about 20 hp gain on radials.
Brother I was reading a bmw m4 xdrive article..... 11.0 qrt mile & 2.5 from 0 to 60. Roll to 60mph 🤮 🗑
But there was a article link at the bottom on the 2015 Z/28. Well enough. Quick 💡 🤔 so how much does a used 1 go for and how well does it hold it's value?
All the emotions I went through
🤯😮😫
🤣
But there was a article link at the bottom on the 2015 Z/28. Well enough. Quick 💡 🤔 so how much does a used 1 go for and how well does it hold it's value?
All the emotions I went through
🤯😮😫
🤣
Nevermind this comment. Mine actually liked it around 12.7AFR. Didn't try to get any leaner.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 10,451
Likes: 1,872
From: My own internal universe
Originally Posted by jayyyw
Nevermind this comment. Mine actually liked it around 12.7AFR. Didn't try to get any leaner.











