Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

700+ hp 416?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2023, 12:50 PM
  #1  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Utinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 172 Likes on 127 Posts
Default 700+ hp 416?

Can we talk about this: (skip to about 21 min for results)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qBIzkmkD6wQ&pp=ygUUa2F5bGEgcnVuZGxlIGNhbWF ybyA%3D

I just want to know how! How is this 416 making 100 hp more than any other 416? I have scoured the internet for dyno results, and they all have 416s making roughly 605-620 hp with aftermarket heads. Most of them have AFR LS3 heads. I believe GPI is using the Brodix BR3 heads. I’m a cheap ***, so I had planned on using stock, ported LS3 heads. Now, I’m thinking aftermarket heads might be worth it for an extra 100hp.

Has anyone else made more than 620hp with a 416?
The following users liked this post:
Rich2342 (01-15-2024)
Old 10-19-2023, 01:09 PM
  #2  
TECH Regular
 
Kawboom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 484
Received 563 Likes on 362 Posts
Default

200psi of cranking compression, torque peak at 5500, power still hasn't peaked at 7200, carburetor, single plane intake, doesn't like to idle, no accessories, its running well but not crazy. It has plenty of cam and compression.

This isn't that crazy of a dyno pull. This isn't a grocery getter street motor, thats for sure.
The following users liked this post:
SlowTBSS (10-19-2023)
Old 10-19-2023, 04:00 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
SAPPER's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Halfway back on the Highway to Hell...again!
Posts: 1,577
Received 246 Likes on 173 Posts

Default

I'll also agree with it's carbed and no FEAD. Also, that's some good numbers but really not that hard to do. All it takes is money and the right combo of parts. I will guarantee the LS3 heads are maxxed out and that big single plane intake is making some steam. That also is not your typical off the shelf carb. Willing to bet that carb is about a $2000 finely tuned piece.

Here is Steve Balusiks build. He street drives this motor in his Nova. BTW, Steve works for Cam Motion. So if you call them, He may be the one that answers. He is one of the sales reps and is one of the best.
https://www.enginelabs.com/engine-te...ild-with-ffre/
The following users liked this post:
low2001gmc (10-19-2023)
Old 10-19-2023, 05:54 PM
  #4  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
02EBC5Z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 483
Received 207 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

Hell, I feel that my 408 would make right about 700 flywheel. Just need the right combo.
The following 2 users liked this post by 02EBC5Z06:
DualQuadDave (10-19-2023), Jimbo1367 (10-24-2023)
Old 10-19-2023, 06:32 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
 
SlowTBSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2023
Posts: 82
Received 63 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

My 402 made 662 with a FAST LSXRT intake on pump gas with less than 250* duration and 235cc cathedral heads. We later added a GZ vacuum pump and made 680s. No exotic parts. It's definitely not cheap but it's not a wild combo either.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...gas-build.html

Last edited by SlowTBSS; 10-19-2023 at 11:44 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by SlowTBSS:
02EBC5Z06 (10-19-2023), DualQuadDave (10-19-2023), low2001gmc (10-19-2023)
Old 10-19-2023, 07:05 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
 
jayyyw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,291
Received 772 Likes on 392 Posts
Default

Funny this came up. I just saw a video this morning about a 416 that put down 600whp through an auto and slicks on the dyno. They were testing the Holley dual 4500 TB lid and picked up 70whp over the standard holley lid. I didnt look back to see what the exact combo was. All I know is they were saying it was a 416 with cathedral heads.
The following 2 users liked this post by jayyyw:
02EBC5Z06 (10-19-2023), DualQuadDave (10-19-2023)
Old 10-19-2023, 07:11 PM
  #7  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
02EBC5Z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 483
Received 207 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jayyyw
Funny this came up. I just saw a video this morning about a 416 that put down 600whp through an auto and slicks on the dyno. They were testing the Holley dual 4500 TB lid and picked up 70whp over the standard holley lid. I didnt look back to see what the exact combo was. All I know is they were saying it was a 416 with cathedral heads.
Well you better find it and send it my way 😂😂
Old 10-19-2023, 07:30 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
 
jayyyw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,291
Received 772 Likes on 392 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 02EBC5Z06
Well you better find it and send it my way 😂😂
Lol, i'll look for it again
The following users liked this post:
02EBC5Z06 (10-19-2023)
Old 10-20-2023, 06:53 AM
  #9  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Utinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 172 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

I wasn’t looking at the carb setup. It made over 730hp with a MSD intake. I know those are good intakes, but it’s a long runner. I have seen 440+ CID engines with a short runner intake that made less than this 416 with the MSD.

I doubted the engine dyno results until I saw the video of her car on the chassis dyno. It made right at 600 Whp, so the 730 crank sounds accurate.

Old 10-20-2023, 06:55 AM
  #10  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
02EBC5Z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 483
Received 207 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

Basically, most of the low 400 cube motors (400-416) are lack luster combinations. Stock ls3 heads or ported 243/799 combos. Stock or fast manifolds. 11.5:1 or less compression. Cam that is meant for stock cube cars that just gets it's dick kicked in from the cubes. Ls7 lifters and bouncy valvetrain that is heavier than hell over the nose (making that already small cam even smaller with the duration/lift lost from the unstable valvetrain).

It ALL adds up really quick. When I set off on my 408 build, I wanted to correct all of this. I haven't gotten the chance to see what it makes yet, or how it performs, but I know that I won't be disappointed from not turning over every stone. The only thing I could do differently to my combo at this point is move to an LS7 head from the cathedral ports that are on it. But I will wait to make that change till I know I am bored of this and want even more.
The following 2 users liked this post by 02EBC5Z06:
DualQuadDave (10-20-2023), SlowTBSS (10-20-2023)
Old 10-20-2023, 07:50 AM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
 
jasons69chevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 337
Received 127 Likes on 99 Posts

Default

She’s using a small bore LS7 style head. She said the gwatney performance 2.0 max package was being used. All the specs can be found so nothing special. I’m sure that MSD would have done better if it was ported.

Last edited by jasons69chevelle; 10-20-2023 at 07:58 AM.
The following users liked this post:
SlowTBSS (10-20-2023)
Old 10-20-2023, 08:15 AM
  #12  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
02EBC5Z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 483
Received 207 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jasons69chevelle
She’s using a small bore LS7 style head. She said the gwatney performance 2.0 max package was being used. All the specs can be found so nothing special. I’m sure that MSD would have done better if it was ported.
Yeah, a ported short runner msd would do real well on that motor.
The following users liked this post:
SlowTBSS (10-20-2023)
Old 10-20-2023, 08:18 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Ryans99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OH & MI
Posts: 1,499
Received 103 Likes on 51 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jasons69chevelle
She’s using a small bore LS7 style head. She said the gwatney performance 2.0 max package was being used. All the specs can be found so nothing special. I’m sure that MSD would have done better if it was ported.
This. The GPI Max 2.0 package is an LS7 port for smaller bores. The power is not at all surprising as you aren't far off from a standard LS7 build at that point. And with the MSD sitting on a tad less cubes, i bet its even happier up top, where it tends to fall off on 427s
Old 10-20-2023, 09:28 AM
  #14  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (104)
 
helicoil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,826
Received 266 Likes on 101 Posts

Default

Very easy to believe and seems on point from that shop. That is very nice power through a 4150 carb and Victor manifold.
I did one that performed pretty well. 416", Mast 255 CNC LS3, 11.6:1, 25x/27x @ .050" hydraulic roller, CID 4.0, 950 Ultra XP
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/gmdf6...ecta0yj7h&dl=0


Last edited by helicoil; 10-20-2023 at 05:41 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by helicoil:
brutalzo6 (10-26-2023), DualQuadDave (10-20-2023), SlowTBSS (10-20-2023)
Old 10-20-2023, 12:27 PM
  #15  
TECH Regular
 
Kawboom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 484
Received 563 Likes on 362 Posts
Default

That curve is suspiciously smooth.
Old 10-20-2023, 01:44 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
 
Bspeck82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,730
Received 415 Likes on 300 Posts
Default

good flowing heads, short runner intakes, cam and compression and lots of RPM will do it. Also its an engine dyno, no accessories and in a controlled environment with controlled water temps. For an example, i built a 12:1 402 with tfs ls3 heads, hyd roller 242/256 cam and a mid runner fast, nothing special. Chassis dyno with 28x10.5 slicks and a loose converter that wasnt locking up and it made 530 wheel @ 6900, run aborted due to tire wrap, and power was still climbing. Mathematically thats close to 700 crank and we couldnt even bring it to peak power, and i had a bad lifter on that pull, dunno if it affected results.
The following users liked this post:
DualQuadDave (10-20-2023)
Old 10-20-2023, 05:20 PM
  #17  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (104)
 
helicoil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,826
Received 266 Likes on 101 Posts

Default


Originally Posted by Kawboom
That curve is suspiciously smooth.

9.75 @ 137 so far at #3250 in 3100' DA air. Looking to get back over to the racetrack yet this year to let it taste some 500' air.

Last edited by helicoil; 10-20-2023 at 05:41 PM.
The following users liked this post:
DualQuadDave (10-20-2023)
Old 10-23-2023, 11:00 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
spanks13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,247
Received 474 Likes on 307 Posts

Default

Engine dynos don't record continuously they draw smooth lines between data points.

730 is 1.75 hp/cube. No doubt that is a higher compression engine and a big cam, but not out of this world results. Good combo. GPI knows their stuff.
The following 2 users liked this post by spanks13:
DualQuadDave (10-24-2023), Rich2342 (01-15-2024)
Old 10-24-2023, 03:27 AM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
 
Jimbo1367's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,849
Received 589 Likes on 467 Posts

Default

It’s all about the part’s combination
The following users liked this post:
grinder11 (10-25-2023)
Old 10-24-2023, 05:14 AM
  #20  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
rkupon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bayville,NJ
Posts: 2,011
Received 750 Likes on 407 Posts

Default

Use an engine builder and not a parts assembler! Some of these guys are light years ahead of others. The devil is in the details!
The following 7 users liked this post by rkupon1:
02EBC5Z06 (10-24-2023), Double06 (10-25-2023), DualQuadDave (10-24-2023), grinder11 (10-25-2023), Jimbo1367 (10-25-2023), NAVYBLUE210 (10-24-2023), SlowTBSS (10-24-2023) and 2 others liked this post. (Show less...)


Quick Reply: 700+ hp 416?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 AM.