403” N/A build…
This is on pump 93 gas and mild timing. With this cars 12:1 compression, on E85 this thing would easily hit 615-620. It’s a hoss. The real winner here is the torque however. 525 ft lbs is built 427 numbers. The PDXS intake is a long runner unit that helps push torque, and the combination is set up to compliment it.
Last edited by Che70velle; Jan 10, 2025 at 04:53 PM.
Incredible results and top shelf work. Thanks for sharing!
Who ground the cam for you? Mind sharing what lobes or is it secret squirrel stuff?
I bet a different intake would offer 600whp but average power would likely be down. The torque curve is faaaaat.
I didn’t need to see the Dynocom reading 10% high 😂😂 I need to get mine on a Dynojet and get some track numbers haha.
my Tuner told me the design LS3 XS intake was best intake he’s tried ,(for under the hood )
on a ls3 style engine
and according to the Eric Weingartner the AFR ls3 mongoose are the best flowing ls3 style heads out there
Incredible results and top shelf work. Thanks for sharing!
Who ground the cam for you? Mind sharing what lobes or is it secret squirrel stuff?
I bet a different intake would offer 600whp but average power would likely be down. The torque curve is faaaaat.
I didn’t need to see the Dynocom reading 10% high 😂😂 I need to get mine on a Dynojet and get some track numbers haha.
The funny thing about talking LS3 intakes is that the GM unit is hard to beat out of the box. Yes, there are mods that help it but few aftermarket variants are available simply because the GM piece is simply that good. This XS was experimental to a degree due to the lack of good data out there. Some have tried it with success, and others didn’t like it. This proves that the combination must be capable of moving a LOT of air. I think the XS is like a 17ish liter intake…it’s got a LOT of plenum volume and has long runners.
I wish this guy would have started the pull at 3k. I’d bet it’s making 400 ft lbs at 3k. The car is ridiculously strong for a 403. It’s a 403 that thinks it’s a 417, and makes 427 torque. Maybe it identifies as a 427?…LOL
Last edited by Che70velle; Jan 10, 2025 at 08:14 PM.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Incredible results and top shelf work. Thanks for sharing!
Who ground the cam for you? Mind sharing what lobes or is it secret squirrel stuff?
I bet a different intake would offer 600whp but average power would likely be down. The torque curve is faaaaat.
I didn’t need to see the Dynocom reading 10% high 😂😂 I need to get mine on a Dynojet and get some track numbers haha.

Its a custom grind I spec'ed and had Comp build for us....I have been using some of their newer lobe designs the last couple of years with good success and this cam is another example of that
It has a good bit of lift with the 1.8 rockers I supplied (.675 / .672) which helps tap into and take advantage of the cylinder heads higher flow portion of the curve.
This head peaks right in the .675 - 700 lift range making it ideal for a hot street strip set up without having to lift the valve a ridiculous amount. They are very efficient
Even at .600 lift the head is already in the 370+ CFM range with a finished CNC port size the same as an unported stock LS3 casting (260 cc's)
Regarding the intake choice I agree that some other choices would have made more peak power but this intake is perfect for this and most street builds.....a mid length runner FAST would probably have required at least 6500 RPM before exceeding the numbers this intake generated but it would be down 40+ ft/lbs of torque at anything under 5500 RPM's
The car on the street would be so much less fun to drive.....and I bet the actual track results (drag strip) would have been very close because the average power thru the gear splits wouldn't have been that much more with a manifold more optimized for higher RPM
It would have made a stronger peak number and carried longer with the mid length FAST for sexier higher RPM numbers (would have easily cleared 600 wheel with a 403 small bore build!) but I like what we accomplished here and for a street car its 100% the right set up.
Real happy with the outcome of this build (exceeded my higher expectations) and Scott did a great job with the assembly and blueprinting of the short block
Good stuff guys.....catch up soon
-Tony
PS......The difference in the dyno's was something else....this is why dyno numbers are almost useless to compare unless they are taken on the same dyno.
No different than flowbench numbers even when guy's aren't fudging the number to make them look better....LOL
Most testing equipment spits out different numbers.....that's why its always ideal to have a baseline run on the same dyno before you mod your car....that's the only true way to see what you really accomplished
While I would have liked to believe the original Dynocom hub dyno numbers it was pretty obvious by the torque output that to me they had to have been inflated but it doesnt take away the fact it was the highest NA car they had seen on that dyno and the owner of the shop was very impressed.
Hub dynos almost always read higher due to the fact that the engine isn't having to accelerate the weight and mass of the rear tires. That's a huge difference at the end of the day
What was cool was the shape of the two curves from two different locations was the same and that makes sense....that's exactly how it should have been

www.mamomotorsports.com
Tony@MamoMotorsports.com
Anything worth doing is worth doing well. Build it right the first time....its alot cheaper than building it twice!!
Last edited by Tony @ Mamo Motorsports; Jan 10, 2025 at 09:02 PM.
only thing I don’t see is a trans/diff brace. I highly suggest it in the near future
Last edited by lazerlemonta; Jan 11, 2025 at 07:33 AM.
ALSO.... it's totally about the COMBO. I think some folks lose touch with this fact. The parts NEED to work in close concert with each other.
It's Tony Mamo's strict adherence to these principles that help make him the moving force in engine builds that he is.
I always love reading his posts and learn from most all of them
Great dyno #'s.....good choice on a clutch. It should rip.
I told nick it should make 600+ whp. I know some think that's alot but for a 400ci~ ls that's where it should be if the engine is for a hotrod. Maybe I'm the outlier on that but a little thought can go a long way on a combo.
I think that brace would be a great plan, as she's a chonk. All that weight/power/gear will probably spell disaster.
only thing I don’t see is a trans/diff brace. I highly suggest it in the near future












