Comp 227/243 LSR Cam
With that being said, my (very limited) camshaft knowledge comes from watching Dick Holdener YouTube videos, reading forums, etc. I've learned, what seems to be accepted as common knowledge, that a larger cam with sizeable gains up top will always sacrifice something down low. You're just "shifting around gains on the curve."
This particular dyno chart really shocked me though. Pulling all the way down to 3,100 and no signs of the 2 curves crossing over? Seems too good to be true. What am I missing? Even charts of much milder cam grinds have begun to give up their gains down low well north of 3k rpm.
With that being said, my (very limited) camshaft knowledge comes from watching Dick Holdener YouTube videos, reading forums, etc. I've learned, what seems to be accepted as common knowledge, that a larger cam with sizeable gains up top will always sacrifice something down low. You're just "shifting around gains on the curve."
This particular dyno chart really shocked me though. Pulling all the way down to 3,100 and no signs of the 2 curves crossing over? Seems too good to be true. What am I missing? Even charts of much milder cam grinds have begun to give up their gains down low well north of 3k rpm.
How much are you willing to give up below, say, 2000 RPM, down there (1750 or so) where your stock converter stalls?
NONE of those videos EVER shows that part of the curve. It's too embarrassing.
Now, if your car is NOT a street driver (track ONLY), and/or you have a converter with a stall at or above 3000, or this is a LIGHT stick car (let's say, Miata) with AT LEAST 4.10 gears, then a cam like that will give you what you want. Since you don't tell us what vehicle this is in, what you're using it for, what gears you have, what converter is in it, etc., the best we can do is GUESS.
How much are you willing to give up below, say, 2000 RPM, down there (1750 or so) where your stock converter stalls?
NONE of those videos EVER shows that part of the curve. It's too embarrassing.
Now, if your car is NOT a street driver (track ONLY), and/or you have a converter with a stall at or above 3000, or this is a LIGHT stick car (let's say, Miata) with AT LEAST 4.10 gears, then a cam like that will give you what you want. Since you don't tell us what vehicle this is in, what you're using it for, what gears you have, what converter is in it, etc., the best we can do is GUESS.
This cam research began because the out of the box “performance” 495/525hp versions of the LS3 from GM (with the LS “Hot” cam and the ASA cam) are apparently both outdated and less than ideal lobe designs. And the ASA cam having bad manners for a daily driver to boot. So I’d rather do my own cam versus paying for the “upgraded” versions that aren’t ideal.
I realize the Superflow engine dynos won’t reliably pull down into that range, which is why that part is not usually shown. However, I’ve looked at a lot of charts and this particular cam seemed to carry a lot of gains all the way down to 3,100 over stock, which is usually NOT the case. It may fall on its face and buck like crazy at low RPMs which would be a dealbreaker on a daily driven truck. That’s what I want to avoid. But the curve stood out as looking pretty damn good to me.
This 227/243 cam with 9 degrees overlap won’t have significant differences in low speed behavior from the ASA cam.
Last edited by grubinski; Apr 17, 2025 at 07:23 PM.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
My current cam has those same specs but with a 115lsa and 4* of advance. Lift is .620 on both sides. That cam would do you a good job along with some head milling and use of a thinner head gasket. If you're putting it in an otherwise stock LS3, I'd have it ground on a 114+4. That will bring the power in a little sooner which I think is important for a street ride.
Here's a "shelf" cam that would do you a good job 2012 Chevrolet Corvette 25-TSP225236 NEW Texas Speed Stage 1 LS3 225/236 .629"/.615" Camshaft
Last edited by old motorhead; Apr 9, 2025 at 08:47 AM.
With that being said, I’m seeing good reviews as well of the BTR Stage 2, V2 camshaft as being “streetable.” (Highly subjective term). The dyno of that cam posted to their site does look tempting, especially seeing how low they did their pull. I guess the problem lies with the fact it’s anyone’s guess what the overlap of this particular cam would be for comparison, with their super secret exhaust duration specs
INTAKE LOBE LIFT @ TDC: 0.05018
With that being said, I’m seeing good reviews as well of the BTR Stage 2, V2 camshaft as being “streetable.” (Highly subjective term). The dyno of that cam posted to their site does look tempting, especially seeing how low they did their pull. I guess the problem lies with the fact it’s anyone’s guess what the overlap of this particular cam would be for comparison, with their super secret exhaust duration specs
INTAKE LOBE LIFT @ TDC: 0.05018
if you like more torque everywhere, tsp released new chopacabra cams today. They have one for a 6.0 and one for a 6.2. The 6.2 is spec'd for rectangle heads. 216/230, .550, .550, 108+2. Low intake duration since the intake ports are huge, and higher exhaust duration to account for their lower exhaust port flow vs intake. 108 lsa for low and mid range torque. .550 to be easy on the valvetrain.
Personally, I’d never buy a cam from BTR because they’re playing cute with their specs like that. It’s irritating, and makes it impossible for a customer to make an informed decision. They want you to be forced to rely on their marketing buzzwords. FBTR.
Personally, I’d never buy a cam from BTR because they’re playing cute with their specs like that. It’s irritating, and makes it impossible for a customer to make an informed decision. They want you to be forced to rely on their marketing buzzwords. FBTR.









