Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

LS2 Strokers w/Knock Sensors?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-25-2004, 03:25 PM
  #21  
TECH Addict
 
66ImpalaLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LT1 and LT4 sensors are exactly the same.
Old 12-25-2004, 04:15 PM
  #22  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
pkincy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Az
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 66ImpalaLT1
LT1 and LT4 sensors are exactly the same.
A true statement however it is misleading. The 92-95 knock sensors for the LT1 are part no 10456126. The 96 sensor (both LT1 and LT4) are part nos 10456287. And widely understood to have less sensitivity to knock.

Perry
Old 12-25-2004, 05:19 PM
  #23  
TECH Apprentice
 
99Fbody99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Take the current LSX sensor and use in with the LS2 block. You will see 2 boss's in the block that can and are used to retro fit the valley sensors to the outside of each bank.

Dave
Old 12-25-2004, 05:32 PM
  #24  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
DrkPhx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St. Michael, MN.
Posts: 4,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99Fbody99
Take the current LSX sensor and use in with the LS2 block. You will see 2 boss's in the block that can and are used to retro fit the valley sensors to the outside of each bank.

Dave
Please elaborate. Have you done this and do you have pics?
Old 12-26-2004, 02:32 PM
  #25  
TECH Addict
 
66ImpalaLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Perry Kincy
A true statement however it is misleading. The 92-95 knock sensors for the LT1 are part no 10456126. The 96 sensor (both LT1 and LT4) are part nos 10456287. And widely understood to have less sensitivity to knock.
The knock module (plug in circuit on the pcm) is what changes the sensitivity of the LT4 to knock.
Old 12-26-2004, 09:50 PM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
'02 SLP#686's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leominster, MA
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Slowhawk
You really don't need the knock sensors.You know I'll tune your car safe I disconnected the knock sensors on my supercharged Vette last summer and still no problems with 12lbs on a stock motor.My new motor will also run without knock sensors
That was all I needed to hear Thanks for chiming in!
Old 12-26-2004, 11:46 PM
  #27  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
pkincy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Az
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DrkPhx
Please elaborate. Have you done this and do you have pics?
I have talked to several people that have confirmed that the LS1 sensors will screw right into the block bosses on the LS2 block. I don't yet know if the LT1 sensors have the same threads but I will soon.

Perry
Old 12-27-2004, 01:06 PM
  #28  
TECH Addict
 
66ImpalaLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the LT1 sensors are NPT thread. Dont know about the LS1, they are probably metric.

Also, the difference between the 93-95 and 96-97 sensors is the impedence. People use the early pcm with the late sensors by putting a resistor in line.
Old 12-27-2004, 02:16 PM
  #29  
JS
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
JS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Delray Beach, Fl.
Posts: 7,303
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

So they screw in,they dont reference the signal is the same manner so they wont work.Slowhawks pretty knowledgable,if u take his tuning advice I dont think you'll have any issues running w/o KS.
Old 12-27-2004, 03:39 PM
  #30  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

forgive me for asking, but this whole LS2 alum block 6L is only valid from a money saving point or isn't it?
It is just more expensive to build sleeved blocks. I just don't really see any other benefit to this block. Am I missing something here?

First we were weary of SD tuning, now it is catching on like fire.
now we are afraid of no KS soon we might all be turning them off.
From a racing point of view, KS is same as BS.
Old 12-27-2004, 03:50 PM
  #31  
JS
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
JS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Delray Beach, Fl.
Posts: 7,303
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

SD tuning is not needed,check my closed loop tuning in the sig.The LS2 block doesnt have to be sleeved,big savings compared to a sleeved LS1 block plus its 100lbs lighter that a iron 408.

I'm waiting til the 7.0 block becomes aval.,then I'll build a 418CI.....
Old 12-27-2004, 04:27 PM
  #32  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Yeah, that's exactly what I said.
Old 12-27-2004, 08:32 PM
  #33  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
forgive me for asking, but this whole LS2 alum block 6L is only valid from a money saving point or isn't it?
It is just more expensive to build sleeved blocks. I just don't really see any other benefit to this block. Am I missing something here?

First we were weary of SD tuning, now it is catching on like fire.
now we are afraid of no KS soon we might all be turning them off.
From a racing point of view, KS is same as BS.
I like the LS2 block because we can hit 402ci safely without resleaving.I see about 50% of the stroker/resleeved blocks having problems with the sleeves now.Just a piece of mind and they are cheaper.
Old 12-27-2004, 10:22 PM
  #34  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
DrkPhx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St. Michael, MN.
Posts: 4,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Slowhawk
I like the LS2 block because we can hit 402ci safely without resleaving.I see about 50% of the stroker/resleeved blocks having problems with the sleeves now.Just a piece of mind and they are cheaper.
Exactly right and weigh nearly 100-lbs lighter. What compression ratio would you recommend for the street? I was thinking 10.9 or 11.2.
Old 12-28-2004, 02:13 AM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
BLASTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: bridgwater, nj
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DrkPhx
Exactly right and weigh nearly 100-lbs lighter. What compression ratio would you recommend for the street? I was thinking 10.9 or 11.2.
I think anywhere in between those CR would be fine.

The KS worry me and I would feel more comfortable having them so I will be anxious to see what happens. I am anticipating the end of next summer to find out the prices on the 7.0L block. Might be seeing some 427 / 441 ci buildups.
Old 12-28-2004, 05:32 AM
  #36  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DrkPhx
Exactly right and weigh nearly 100-lbs lighter. What compression ratio would you recommend for the street? I was thinking 10.9 or 11.2.
I like 11-1 N/A on the street/pump gas.I've personally run 11.4-1 on my last car and liked it.For my Vette I'm going 9.5-1 to complement the blower.
Old 12-29-2004, 12:27 PM
  #37  
Staging Lane
 
ecthelion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Formerly Hayden, AL . . . Now Attleboro Falls, MA
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

First off, I'm glad that the knock sensor issue is being addressed. I know it has been well established that we CAN run without the knock sensors, but I think the existance of this thread proves that there are a lot of people out there, myself included, who aren't comfortable running sensorless. Please, keep us all up to date on the attempted solutions. . . .
Old 01-10-2005, 05:04 PM
  #38  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
texada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: alexandria, La
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Whats the latest onthe KS issue? Will we have this resolved sometime this year?
Old 01-11-2005, 05:00 PM
  #39  
KJ
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
KJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We have a few different sources that are helping us work on this issue, but nothing yet. I know there are alot of people that want the knock sensors to work, and I am sure someone will come up with the answer. As for now all we can do is tune safe. As soon as here back from my sources I will post everything they tell me.
Old 01-11-2005, 05:56 PM
  #40  
Launching!
 
horsepower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Our prototype knock sensor'd LS2 402 (gen III knock sensors and FULL function on a gen IV LS2 block) is on the dyno right now; I'll update as soon as we're sure it works/proves out...it is really slick

In the mean time, our 402 LS2's are online being built. We have 402 iron blocks in stock, shipping -

Best regards,
Brian


Quick Reply: LS2 Strokers w/Knock Sensors?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 PM.