Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

LS7 Fuel Economy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-2005 | 12:01 PM
  #1  
WECIV's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 0
From: Gulf Shores and DC
Default LS7 Fuel Economy

Possibly the stupidest question ever. What kind of fuel economy on the interstate would an LS7 be looking at? I know supercar buyers do not buy cars for MPG, but I was just wondering what the fuel economy would be?
Old 01-11-2005 | 02:16 PM
  #2  
Turo's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

bad/bad. just guessing, i have no idea . actualy, i bet you that with the 6-speed, the mpg will be pretty good considering its a 7.0L engine
Old 01-11-2005 | 02:22 PM
  #3  
93LS1RX7's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

I would guess 18/25 is what the EPA will rate it. Hell look at the 04 Z06 it did 20/28.

These cars still have to pass emissions which means very little bad stuff coming out unburned at low rpms.

But like you said who cares.
Old 01-11-2005 | 02:23 PM
  #4  
93LS1RX7's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

Hell the Viper's V-10 gets 20 on the highway
Old 01-11-2005 | 02:41 PM
  #5  
black_z's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,324
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Default

I bet it will get 23 MPG or more on the highway.
Old 01-12-2005 | 04:04 PM
  #6  
Troy's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 264
Likes: 1
From: Northern NJ
Default

i'd buy it if it got 15, who cares RIGHT???
Old 01-12-2005 | 04:20 PM
  #7  
BlueSix's Avatar
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
From: its fucking cold
Default

1) you dont buy a $65K sports car and care about mileage
2) 17/22- that's my guess
Old 01-14-2005 | 04:28 AM
  #8  
taz99's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Default

Estimated fuel economy
(mpg city / hwy / combined): automatic: 18 / 25 / 21
manual: 19 / 28 / 23 TBD

GM info.
Old 01-14-2005 | 02:05 PM
  #9  
WhiteDiamond's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by taz99
Estimated fuel economy
(mpg city / hwy / combined): automatic: 18 / 25 / 21
manual: 19 / 28 / 23 TBD

GM info.
Those are regular C6 coupe and convertible figures, not Z06 C6 info.
Old 01-14-2005 | 07:10 PM
  #10  
taz99's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WhiteDiamond
Those are regular C6 coupe and convertible figures, not Z06 C6 info.
Thats what J-ROD posted in this forum not too long ago. Check that thread if you dont belive me,
Old 01-15-2005 | 03:31 PM
  #11  
shandy294's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
From: Cibolo Tx
Default

I'm guessing as high as 28 hwy.
Old 01-15-2005 | 05:10 PM
  #12  
NOSjohn's Avatar
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 0
Default

I care, I want one as a daily driver & home. I would have to get rid of my house payment to get one.
Old 01-15-2005 | 05:31 PM
  #13  
SmokingWS6's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 2
From: St. Louis MO
Default

I doubt there will be an auto ls7. Can you immagine the extreme measures torque management will take to protect the 4l60e. horrible. I think it should only be a m6 car. That being said either way, the ls7 will be the most efficient 500hp production car ever produced. I wouldnt worry about the mpg one bit.
Old 01-15-2005 | 06:09 PM
  #14  
SSINFUL's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: Leg Dist #31, WA
Default

Originally Posted by WECIV
Possibly the stupidest question ever. What kind of fuel economy on the interstate would an LS7 be looking at? I know supercar buyers do not buy cars for MPG, but I was just wondering what the fuel economy would be?
You're right. Reminds me of buying a 1977 280Z nearly 30 years ago. Paying over $7k for a car, and I asked my old man the questions, "Gee, I wonder what kind of mileage it gets?"

His response: "You've got 7 grand to spend on a car, you don't care what gas costs..."

Times haven't changed...
Old 01-16-2005 | 03:00 PM
  #15  
extremecorvette's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

February CAR AND DRIVER has it as 16/22 mpg
Old 01-16-2005 | 05:31 PM
  #16  
ZR2877's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Default

I would say anything around 20 is good. My friend just told me he's lucky to get 24 in his SRT-4. I wish I could get 20 mpg again. I would have to really try to get 20.
Old 01-16-2005 | 05:41 PM
  #17  
extremecorvette's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

My corvette gets 24 in town and 32 on the hw with all the mods. My gas mpg went up after all the heads and cam. I did get it dyno tuned so I thinked that helped also. From Chicago to Davenport Iowa I got 36 MPG
Old 01-17-2005 | 11:43 AM
  #18  
GuitsBoy's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,249
Likes: 3
From: Long Island, NY
Default

If I recall correctly, the LS7 was still scheduled to use DOD (displacement on demand) which disables alternating cylinders fuel until I assume a TPS threshold is passed. Damn would it be nice to only pay the gas bill of a 3.5L 4 cylinder vette, but have the performance of the 7.0L wne you stand on the pedal.
Old 01-17-2005 | 12:04 PM
  #19  
jtsc23's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: B.C, MI
Default

Originally Posted by GuitsBoy
If I recall correctly, the LS7 was still scheduled to use DOD (displacement on demand) which disables alternating cylinders fuel until I assume a TPS threshold is passed. Damn would it be nice to only pay the gas bill of a 3.5L 4 cylinder vette, but have the performance of the 7.0L wne you stand on the pedal.
No DoD for the LS7. The DoD lifters weigh too much for the revs that the LS7 pulls. I'm pretty confident here as the guys who engineered the exhaust valve and DoD lifter are two cubicals away from me. I'm stuck working on Ford 3V valvetrain
Old 01-17-2005 | 12:14 PM
  #20  
GuitsBoy's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,249
Likes: 3
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by jtsc23
No DoD for the LS7. The DoD lifters weigh too much for the revs that the LS7 pulls. I'm pretty confident here as the guys who engineered the exhaust valve and DoD lifter are two cubicals away from me. I'm stuck working on Ford 3V valvetrain
Please tell me you hate your job and how much it sucks. I invision working designing engine components to be the coolest job in the world, and im rediculously jealous...

incidentally, I stand corrected regarding DoD. That makes sense, although i didnt know it was lifter actuated. I knew that chrysler's dod was though.


Quick Reply: LS7 Fuel Economy



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:34 AM.