Will L92 heads fit?
09-10-2006, 06:38 PM
#1
Will L92 heads fit? Has anybody else noticed that L92 head threads are almost as numerous in here as "what cam should I use G5X3 or MS4" threads are in the LS1-LS6 section? NO offense to those thread starters, cuz I know that the search button don't always work. Just an observation....
09-11-2006, 03:25 PM
#5
like any other tech site, alot of it is the same things over and over...
for example, on another site i frequent, you'll see a million posts asking how to land a double.
IMO, if you have to ask on the Internet, you shouldn't be jumping doubles yet. LOL.
EDIT:
double refering to jumping on a dirtbike.. LOL. i guess thats what happens when you jump back and forth between forums.
for example, on another site i frequent, you'll see a million posts asking how to land a double.
IMO, if you have to ask on the Internet, you shouldn't be jumping doubles yet. LOL.
EDIT:
double refering to jumping on a dirtbike.. LOL. i guess thats what happens when you jump back and forth between forums.
Last edited by MrDude_1; 09-12-2006 at 01:03 PM.
09-11-2006, 04:25 PM
#6
TECH Veteran
well alot of people dont understand "bore sizes" and things like that. they just see a killer flowing head and a good price and need to know if it will work. you start throwing figures at them and its like chinese arithmatic to them....
Trending Topics
09-13-2006, 08:00 PM
#9
Originally Posted by BLKWS6
well alot of people dont understand "bore sizes" and things like that. they just see a killer flowing head and a good price and need to know if it will work. you start throwing figures at them and its like chinese arithmatic to them....
09-13-2006, 11:49 PM
#15
TECH Regular
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Arlington, TN
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A cam for the L92 heads???
I would suggest not going with a LS1 based cam.
The size and flow difference between the intake and exhaust ports for a L92 head are closer to the LS7's design then they are a LS1.
A quick read up will tell you a large variance between the intake duration and exhaust duration makes the LS7 head produce the most power (something like 25 to 30). Something along the lines of a 228 intake and a 243 exhaust would probably be a good start.
The L92 head has a massive amount of flow/volume and medium velocity on the intake, where the exhaust is medium flow with a high velocity (well that is how I look at it).
Making people read the stickies before posting... that would take the fun out of the noobs.
I would suggest not going with a LS1 based cam.
The size and flow difference between the intake and exhaust ports for a L92 head are closer to the LS7's design then they are a LS1.
A quick read up will tell you a large variance between the intake duration and exhaust duration makes the LS7 head produce the most power (something like 25 to 30). Something along the lines of a 228 intake and a 243 exhaust would probably be a good start.
The L92 head has a massive amount of flow/volume and medium velocity on the intake, where the exhaust is medium flow with a high velocity (well that is how I look at it).
Making people read the stickies before posting... that would take the fun out of the noobs.
09-14-2006, 08:52 AM
#16
Originally Posted by Bring the Noise
A cam for the L92 heads???
I would suggest not going with a LS1 based cam.
The size and flow difference between the intake and exhaust ports for a L92 head are closer to the LS7's design then they are a LS1.
A quick read up will tell you a large variance between the intake duration and exhaust duration makes the LS7 head produce the most power (something like 25 to 30). Something along the lines of a 228 intake and a 243 exhaust would probably be a good start.
The L92 head has a massive amount of flow/volume and medium velocity on the intake, where the exhaust is medium flow with a high velocity (well that is how I look at it).
Making people read the stickies before posting... that would take the fun out of the noobs.
I would suggest not going with a LS1 based cam.
The size and flow difference between the intake and exhaust ports for a L92 head are closer to the LS7's design then they are a LS1.
A quick read up will tell you a large variance between the intake duration and exhaust duration makes the LS7 head produce the most power (something like 25 to 30). Something along the lines of a 228 intake and a 243 exhaust would probably be a good start.
The L92 head has a massive amount of flow/volume and medium velocity on the intake, where the exhaust is medium flow with a high velocity (well that is how I look at it).
Making people read the stickies before posting... that would take the fun out of the noobs.
09-16-2006, 02:50 AM
#18
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
L92 heads made the LS1 obsolete. when you can buy stock L92 heads for 800 bucks that flow better than $1200 ported 243s there is an issue... im mad i have an LS1 now, i want a 4.00 inch bore 
09-16-2006, 08:16 AM
#19
Originally Posted by Cop Car
L92 heads made the LS1 obsolete. when you can buy stock L92 heads for 800 bucks that flow better than $1200 ported 243s there is an issue... im mad i have an LS1 now, i want a 4.00 inch bore