DIFFRENCES BETWEEN WARHAWK BLOCK(biggest one) AND THE LSx BY GM PERFROMANCE PARTS
12-19-2006, 12:52 AM
#21
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nine Ball
Someone asked about the requirement for custom headers. Those would be needed on the tall-deck versions since the cylinder heads would be positioned slightly higher than a regular deck block. That means your headers would sit higher too, which may mean that there would be some interferences that didn't exist before.
12-19-2006, 02:51 PM
#31
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MerlinPro
We are going with 4.000 on the 9.24 and 4.250 and 4.500 on the 9.8.
12-19-2006, 02:55 PM
#32
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gordon0652
Could the LSX block withstand more abuse that the Warhawk?
12-19-2006, 03:04 PM
#34
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gordon0652
But how much abuse would you think the Warhawk withstand?
12-19-2006, 03:18 PM
#35
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Austin, TEXAS > *
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 383ss
what do you mean just hp? maybe Merlin will chime in. I wouldn't want to speculate on that.
12-19-2006, 04:10 PM
#37
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Quickin
Whats the most cubes with a short deck, but only using a 4.125 bore?
.
.
since they are only recommending a 4" stroke, 427 is the max recommended.
12-19-2006, 08:36 PM
#40
Originally Posted by Gordon0652
Since the LSX can be as big as 511cu, how is that still considered a smallblock?