Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

L92 vs. LS2.... help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 08:44 AM
  #1  
Durney's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default L92 vs. LS2.... help

I couldnt do it...thats right I couldnt bring myself to convert my 10.5 shootout 1966 Chevy II to a LS street car so I am going to build what I have always wanted anyway....its little brother... 1966 Chevy II WAGON!

After reading for a few weeks and my eyes falling from my head, I want to use a complete drop out low mile gen IV...but I REALLY want to use the l92 stuff. SO....do I find a Denali take out or get an LS2 and do the head thing.

Here are my requirements.... aluminum block, L92 heads, as stock as possible (i.e. complete takeout with trans), and 500 crank HP.

I assume a cam change is in order and have experience with EFI live....soooo
whuddya guys think?

oh and what about eliminating all the dod stuff? I still want mileage so if I am running all the factory harnesses would it hurt performance?

POST 1!
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 09:31 AM
  #2  
TurboLark's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: Alta Loma, CA
Default

I think the cost for a L92 takeout is gonna be pretty high. I'd go LS2 and L92 heads and L76 intake. Bump up the compression a bit, cam it, and have fun with what ya got. Will move the nova Wagon just peachy.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 12:08 PM
  #3  
Durney's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for the input. Thats certainly the LS2 option isnt it...but if an low mile LS2 is 3000 and the heads and intake run 1400 (plus all the peripherals like rockers gaskets p-rods etc.) and I can get a complete L92 for 5000.00 then...... what are the advantages of the ls2?

I am still wondering about the HP potential of these L92's with a simple cam change and tune....anyone tried it yet?
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 02:00 PM
  #4  
fenix999's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 1
From: Miami, Florida
Default

L92 just has a few more cubic inches, and its basically an LS3 in a truck. So all you have to do is change the dam fugly truck intake to the australian L76 with all the rest of the things needed, cam it, tune it, and 500+hp is easily obtainable.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 03:17 PM
  #5  
Durney's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

Agreed..... plus I dont think the 66' hood will fit well with that blob....

Or....third option....LS3 crate? I'd be saving the $ from the l76 intake swap right? but then I am still under the power goal....

hmm.......
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 09:23 PM
  #6  
66 BADBOY's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 250
Likes: 2
From: MI
Default

Originally Posted by fenix999
L92 just has a few more cubic inches, and its basically an LS3 in a truck. So all you have to do is change the dam fugly truck intake to the australian L76 with all the rest of the things needed, cam it, tune it, and 500+hp is easily obtainable.
Don't want to sound stupid, but why wouldn't the LS6 intake work on the L92? Why do you need an L76 intake? What the heck is an L76 intake?
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2007 | 09:24 AM
  #7  
Torkman15's Avatar
10 Second Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
From: Mid Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by 66 BADBOY
Don't want to sound stupid, but why wouldn't the LS6 intake work on the L92? Why do you need an L76 intake? What the heck is an L76 intake?
Intake port shape and configuration are completley different. The bolt holes are even changed.

Good question, you wont find out if you dont ask or have some experience with LSX parts interchangability.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2007 | 09:58 AM
  #8  
blackbyrd's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,641
Likes: 392
From: cookeville, TN
Default

why not get a iron block and l92 heads do a little head work on the l92s (open the exhaust ports) and start from there?? i know you stated you wanted aluminum but i was just curious.

course if you are going for a pull out it really doesnt matter you will have all you need for the l92 set up minus the intake and rails.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 09:30 AM
  #9  
SS Enforcer's Avatar
11 Second Club
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 226
Likes: 1
From: Sydney
Default

Originally Posted by Durney
Agreed..... plus I dont think the 66' hood will fit well with that blob....

Or....third option....LS3 crate? I'd be saving the $ from the l76 intake swap right? but then I am still under the power goal....

hmm.......
The ls3 crate would be your easiest option. Just cam it and add good pipes and you will have your 500 crank HP easily. My 6.0l with a small cam makes roughly that on a Aussie Dynalog.

cheers
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 09:14 AM
  #10  
Durney's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks again guys...after another week of thought and research it look like the LS3 is going to be it. The question becomes..... do I wait for GM to release it as a GMPP crate with thier cam upgrade or buy it now as a replacement and do my own cam swap. I am HOPING GM's LS376/480HP is rated using SAE stds. and it actually makes 500+ ....does anyone know????

Oh and one other question.... are they using DBW throttle bodies on the crate LS3's?

(I realize they haven't been released yet but maybe some of the insiders can shed some light here)
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 09:40 AM
  #11  
JS's Avatar
JS
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 4
From: Delray Beach, Fl.
Default

I would get a ls2 block,bore it and put a 4in crank in it = 408
The add a set of L92's with LW valves and proper camshaft with a ported L76 intake.

600HP easy.....
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 10:40 AM
  #12  
MastMotorsports's Avatar
FormerVendor
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Nacogdoches, TX
Default

We have a 540HP/490TQ L92 HO that would work well for your swap.

http://www.mastmotorsports.com/turnk...main_flash.php

Shaun

www.mastmotorsports.com
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 06:01 PM
  #13  
Durney's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

Perhaps I should clarify my reasons here. I am no stranger to performance engine building after doing it professionally for over 15 years and now doing performance aftermarket consulting. What I wanted to do was NOT have to build an engine (for the first time) but rather plug it in and go.......

Dont get me wrong...I already have conceded to a cam swap (if necessary) and I have a bare L92 casting sitting in front of me as I type this ( A present from a friend to entice me ) but I really would rather spend more time with the body/chassis/etc. on this project.

now about that dbw throttle body....on the crate LS3?
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 PM.