Convince me to build LS instead of BBC!!!
With your numbers you should try for sonsorships
either way 7secs no matter how you look at it is hella fast , what makes it special to me and others is the fact it was with an LS series
And W2W gave me a quote for a 1,500 hp LSx engine, it was over $60,000..........NO WARRANTY at all.
A 1,500 hp 598ci with a Procharger from Fast Times Motorworks was $31,000. With a WARRANTY. And believe me, that BBC 598ci with the Procharger will last 10 times longer than a 1,400 hp LSx....that is a fact.
.
How much were your 580cfm Brodix heads?
The ETP CV heads are $10,000, complete.
.
But give examples of block failure and not justblanket statements.
Your right 11 deg LSX head vs 18deg BBC head, flow numbers tells the whole story. which is more Efficient? which means less is more right? Bigger flow numbers doesnt mean better when it comes to VE.
And yes i would really like to know what and how these LSX aluminum block came apart.
And gearhead are you trying to convince us or yourself what way is better? You seem stuck on the 540 procharged, Go with it. It will work either way you'll be happy.
nobdody really went for or against this.. i dont want to go into the complexity of turbos... why are turbos the only way to go if I want multiple tunes. why can I not take off the blower belt (adjust wastegate for turbos) for my street tune and put my belt on (adjust wastegate for turbos) for strip tune?
my goal is to try and have two tunes.. a low one for street driving so that i dont slide everywhere(550-750) and a strip tune so i can run 9's in a chevelle(~1000hp).. if somebody sees a better way of doing this with a BB than a procharged 540 im all ears.. thats y im here.. for ideas and suggestions.. if a big nitrous shot is that much easier I would consider it..
Last edited by gearhead1186; Nov 6, 2007 at 08:18 PM.
But give examples of block failure and not justblanket statements.
Your right 11 deg LSX head vs 18deg BBC head, flow numbers tells the whole story. which is more Efficient? which means less is more right? Bigger flow numbers doesnt mean better when it comes to VE.
And yes i would really like to know what and how these LSX aluminum block came apart.
But when you have engines that are running at or close to their max potential, which is what you will have with a 1,000 HP LS1, LS6, LS2, LS7 block, you are decreasing the longevity and reliability.
With a BBC at 1,000 hp, its just getting started.
.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
But we are talking about a 9 second chevelle not a 6 second drag car. He only needs to make about 750hp to get into the 9s. All he really needs is a 9.5:1 383 with trickflow heads, a small solid roller, a th400, 4.10 gears and a full weight 71 chevelle(3600 with driver) will go 10.20 @ 136 on the first stage(250 shot) at a little over 7000rpm on a 28x12.50 et street. Now that setup was not making anywhere near 750hp. It was making more than 750 on the second stage but not much more and it was a fairly budget built 9 second daily driven street car. It takes even less to get an ls1 to run 9s. Big blocks are not needed to do.
But they are cooler. And easy to do it with.
Making a reliable forged LSX motor that would get 550+ NA HP and withstand a 350 shot would be a piece of cake!
I spoke to Gayle Banks awhile ago, he's one of the top turbo engine builders on the planet. He has TT engines that make 1,600 hp, built for street use, that can be turned up and down while you're rolling to make 500 hp up to 1,600 hp. It simply operates the waste gates via pocket computer.
Look at this: 522 BBC Twin Turbo. 2,000 hp with boost controller turned up....1,000 hp with it turned down. You can do the same thing with a 1,000 hp TT BBC, turn it down to 700-800 whenever you want. This guy is the king of TT engines.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUOOK06UrZs
.
Screw it. Get a GM LSX iron block if you do choose to push one to 1,000 hp. You can have it drive VERY VERY nice on the street and be sitting around 625-650 RWHP, then spray it with a 250 progressive direct port shot.
You'll easily have your 9's, maybe 8's, and a daily driver car.
Complete LSX sprayed engine will cost about $18,000 or so. NO WARRANTY.
The BBC 632ci/1000 hp comes with a 2yr/unlimited mileage warranty....hard to beat that man.
.
Screw it. Get a GM LSX iron block if you do choose to push one to 1,000 hp. You can have it drive VERY VERY nice on the street and be sitting around 625-650 RWHP, then spray it with a 250 progressive direct port shot.
You'll easily have your 9's, maybe 8's, and a daily driver car.
Complete LSX sprayed engine will cost about $18,000 or so.
.
Now your talkin!! Amen brother you've seen the LIGHT!!!
8.35 @ 169mph. Power out the wazoo. My kinda guy
This is another dis-advantage of having a high hp LSx engine, you must spray it or blow it to get these power levels, then you lose warranty.
.
the whole point of this thread is to see if it was worth the trouble to swap in an LS for my goals.
nobdody really went for or against this.. i dont want to go into the complexity of turbos... why are turbos the only way to go if I want multiple tunes. why can I not take off the blower belt (adjust wastegate for turbos) for my street tune and put my belt on (adjust wastegate for turbos) for strip tune?
my goal is to try and have two tunes.. a low one for street driving so that i dont slide everywhere(550-750) and a strip tune so i can run 9's in a chevelle(~1000hp).. if somebody sees a better way of doing this with a BB than a procharged 540 im all ears.. thats y im here.. for ideas and suggestions.. if a big nitrous shot is that much easier I would consider it..
I figured you were gonna go with the big block anyways. Which is a great choice. The 71 chevelle I was talking about has a turbo big block going into it now. But I really can't go into that. But it should make some good power. You'll be happy with it. As far as cost I don't know if it will be any cheaper. I sure hope you are going with EFI and not a carburetor. Cheers.
Basically, he's looking at spending about $20K+ on a 1,000 hp LSX or exactly $21K for the 632ci/1,000 hp.
The 632 will last longer, will be more reliable, will be on pump gas (LSX FI will require race gas if it's gonna last more than 1 month), will be awesome for that type of car, and a WARRANTY.
For him, with a '70 Chevelle, it's a no-brainer.
If it were an F-Body, the LSX because you would have $2,000-$3,000 in fabbing to make the BBC fit.
If anything, he's got pros and cons all over this thread for both now.
.







