LS4 Performance Grand Prix GXP | Monte Carlo SS | Impala SS | LaCrosse Super

Ls4 Underrated????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2006, 07:48 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
N20LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Question Ls4 Underrated????

Why do LS4 powered cars trap over 100MPH (102/103) in the quarter mile, and are rated at 303hp, while the old LT1 vettes/camaros had about the same 1/4 mile MPH, with about the same horsepower, but weighted much less?

I think GM underrated the LS4 engines, I think the have about 320hp or more.
Old 04-12-2006, 09:08 AM
  #2  
Teching In
 
SpeedyZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think that the old Lt1 were rated at 275 HP. My LS1 in my 01 was rated at 305 HP which was under rated
Old 04-12-2006, 10:08 AM
  #3  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
raven_450's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the more they under rate the cars the happier ppl are when they run good numbers and i believe its for insurance purpases aswell i believe ford had to do this with the 03/04 cobras? not 100% sure though
Old 04-13-2006, 05:26 AM
  #4  
Launching!
 
BigMikeGXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brandon, MS
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I also think they are underated some also. Average ETs would even be better if the damn things would grip in the 60 foot. But the car does have alot more low down torque than top end horsepower so that may be why it seems to be rated low. I don't even shift out of 2nd gear in the quarter mile. I think it has a 2.93 final drive... can't remember for sure. We won't know unless someone yanks it out and straps in on a dyno.
Old 04-13-2006, 09:14 AM
  #5  
On The Tree
iTrader: (12)
 
jdaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ballston Spa, NY
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BigMikeGXP
I also think they are underated some also. Average ETs would even be better if the damn things would grip in the 60 foot. But the car does have alot more low down torque than top end horsepower so that may be why it seems to be rated low. I don't even shift out of 2nd gear in the quarter mile. I think it has a 2.93 final drive... can't remember for sure. We won't know unless someone yanks it out and straps in on a dyno.
I wouldn't say they are underrated, but they are quite strong. I found this in the Free Magnaflow Exhaust thread... https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....28&postcount=7

That seems about right for the rated power.
Old 04-13-2006, 09:28 AM
  #6  
On The Tree
 
GTPprix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Macomb Township, MI
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've seen engine dyno results, it's right on the money.
Old 04-24-2006, 09:14 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
 
GXPPOWER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: crossett, Arkansas
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

we dont have 2.93 gears. we have 3 something.
Old 05-09-2006, 05:22 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
 
TonyGXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 606
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

no the final drive is 2.93, the SS's is 3.29 ..mine is 4.10
Old 05-09-2006, 07:59 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
 
GXPPOWER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: crossett, Arkansas
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

does that 4.10 stand for 4-10 mpg on the hiway..... AHAHHA
Old 05-11-2006, 07:04 PM
  #10  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
hurley_21_07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hurley, WI
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That's one fast SS you got there.

Dan
Old 05-12-2006, 08:42 AM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
BuffaloSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 2,421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 05-12-2006, 10:18 AM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Genesis_26317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jdaniels
I wouldn't say they are underrated, but they are quite strong. I found this in the Free Magnaflow Exhaust thread... https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....28&postcount=7

That seems about right for the rated power.

That thing runs a single cat????

Wow, it really needs two... in all honesty though to push that much power out of a stock exhaust designed like that is really impressive. It has 3 more hp and ft/lbs of torque than the Mustang, imagine after bolt-ons.

How bad is the torque steer with that vehicle??? My Taurus was wild off the line and it couldn't hold traction until it hit third gear.
Old 05-15-2006, 01:23 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
BuffaloSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 2,421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you're new to the vehicle and drop the pedal (even at 65), you better have a decent handle on the wheel...b/c it will pull you across the highway if you're not paying attention. I've gotten used to it, though, and it's no longer an issue.
Old 05-22-2006, 01:28 PM
  #14  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
hexxLS4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Same here...at first the torque steer was pretty bad when I would get on it...now I barely notice it anymore and can launch comfortably with one hand on the wheel.



Quick Reply: Ls4 Underrated????



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM.