LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Hp estimate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 31, 2009 | 09:05 PM
  #1  
ChevyMaxx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Willmar, MN
Default Hp estimate

Hey, i bought a rolled over trans am with a built up motor, currently working on putting it into my v6 camaro. I was just wondering if you guys could tell me about how much hp this setup should make.

1996 Lt1 79k on shortblock
3k on rest of parts
Edelbrock LT4 intake
58mm bbk throttlebody
Trickflow 195cc heads
Comp cam XFI 268 cam, 218/224 .570/.565
comp cams high energy lifters
roller rockers
comp cams beehive springs
msd cap and rotor
msd coil
msd 6al ignition box
pacesetter longtubes+ypipe, custom 3in to back
no emmissions, no cats
moroso cai, aluminum elbow
aftermarket maf
27lb new era injectors
wait4me tune
6 sp tranny
3.42 gears

Thanks!
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 04:14 PM
  #2  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 15
Default

VERY poorly setup car.
The Edelbrock intake has if anything shown to be a step backwards from stock.
The Trickflow heads are a poor choice for an NA stock shortblock due to substantial compression loss.
XFI cams are underperforming spring eaters.
Lifters are stock equivalant.
The MSD ignition pieces are at best unnecessary(cap and rotor are fine).
Aftermarket MAF only makes it harder to tune, no power to be had there.
27lbs injectors, really poor choice, that proves this is a WEAK turd of a setup, a good heads/cam setup usually needs closer to a 30lbs injector. I tried 28s on mine and maxxed them out enough to go lean.

Some 4.10s would be a MUCH better match to the 6-speed tranny, with the .50 overdrive even 4.10s are mellow on the highway. Put it this way, a nice mellow 2000rpm cruise would be 75mph.

Not what you wanted to hear, but the truth isn't always pretty.


The heads make a good foundation for porting for a stroker or for a boosted setup, but that huge chamber is the wrong way to go for an NA stock shortblock.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 04:26 PM
  #3  
za355tx's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (109)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 994
Likes: 2
From: Dfw
Default

Pretty much true but maybe not the best way to express it. You should have done some more research before you bought all these parts. Test have shown the Edelbrock intakes make less HP than stock ones with the same mods. That cam is tiny and not a good choice, a custom cam would have been a better choice. What Cap said about the heads...100% true. With decent sized valves you won't be able to get decent compression on a stock shortblock. TFS heads do great on stroker motors but because of the longer stroke you are able to build more compression. Aftermarket MAF is almost never a good idea. There are lots of places to improve and unless you are interested in having tons of money invested in a car that really isn't that fast...I would reconsider alot of things.

Different heads.
Different cam.
AT LEAST 3.73 gears but 4.10's would be better.
A better set of injectors. Some good 30#'s minimum.
Stock MAF.

Again like cap said probably not what you were looking for but it's the truth. But if you did decide to put that setup together, I can't see it making but 350ish rwhp assuming you can get the tune dialed in.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 04:37 PM
  #4  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 15
Default

He said he bought a junk car with these parts.

I am not a salesman, I just tell it like it is. Not my fault the American public has been brought up to believe they need to be coddled and sold on everything. World would be a better place if there was as much worry about facts and information as there is stroking everyone.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 05:31 PM
  #5  
ss.slp.ls1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,184
Likes: 28
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
VERY poorly setup car.
The Edelbrock intake has if anything shown to be a step backwards from stock.
The Trickflow heads are a poor choice for an NA stock shortblock due to substantial compression loss.
XFI cams are underperforming spring eaters.
Lifters are stock equivalant.
The MSD ignition pieces are at best unnecessary(cap and rotor are fine).
Aftermarket MAF only makes it harder to tune, no power to be had there.
27lbs injectors, really poor choice, that proves this is a WEAK turd of a setup, a good heads/cam setup usually needs closer to a 30lbs injector. I tried 28s on mine and maxxed them out enough to go lean.

Some 4.10s would be a MUCH better match to the 6-speed tranny, with the .50 overdrive even 4.10s are mellow on the highway. Put it this way, a nice mellow 2000rpm cruise would be 75mph.

Not what you wanted to hear, but the truth isn't always pretty.


The heads make a good foundation for porting for a stroker or for a boosted setup, but that huge chamber is the wrong way to go for an NA stock shortblock.
Well put.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 05:37 PM
  #6  
nik1703's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 966
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach, CA
Default

ouch. this thread hurt and it's not even me, LOL

wait, you guys are saying that if i drop 4.10s in my rear i will be @2k RPM in 6th gear at 75mph?

that's what i do now at 80mph in 6th with stock gears
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 05:40 PM
  #7  
ss.slp.ls1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,184
Likes: 28
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by nik1703
ouch. this thread hurt and it's not even me, LOL

wait, you guys are saying that if i drop 4.10s in my rear i will be @2k RPM in 6th gear at 75mph?

that's what i do now at 80mph in 6th with stock gears
With a six speed and 4.10's, rpm in 6th gear is only going to increase by a few hundred rpm. right now I don't crack 2k rpm until i hit ~90mph.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 05:42 PM
  #8  
nik1703's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 966
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ss.slp.ls1
With a six speed and 4.10's, rpm in 6th gear is only going to increase by a few hundred rpm. right now I don't crack 2k rpm until i hit ~90mph.
what gears do you have? i think you told me one time i have 3.42's (stock 1993). what's the point of putting those in if the difference is marginal?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 05:51 PM
  #9  
ss.slp.ls1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,184
Likes: 28
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by nik1703
what gears do you have? i think you told me one time i have 3.42's (stock 1993). what's the point of putting those in if the difference is marginal?
I think your car has 3.23 gears for a '93 M6. I have stock 3.42's (same as all '94-'02 M6 Fbody's). And it will only be a slight change in such a low gear. The differences in 1-4 w/ 4.10 gears is substantial.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 05:53 PM
  #10  
creepingdeath94's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: PSL, FL
Default

What cam do you recommend in that general range then if not the XFI? I ask because I was thinking about that exact cam when I do mine, but it is going to be a relatively mild motor anyway...350hp maybe by the time all is said and done...mostly a daily driver that has some grunt.

* note...I also ask because the XFI is in the sticky which I did read and it says nothing about it being that bad aside from needing behives.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 05:54 PM
  #11  
nik1703's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 966
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ss.slp.ls1
I think your car has 3.23 gears for a '93 M6. I have stock 3.42's (same as all '94-'02 M6 Fbody's). And it will only be a slight change in such a low gear. The differences in 1-4 w/ 4.10 gears is substantial.
ah i see, but 6th seems to be relatively unchanged. I can't imagine how i'd have traction with bigger gears, i dont have anything in 1st gear right now, just all spinning. Maybe i need some nittos, these sumi's are pretty weak ;]
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 06:02 PM
  #12  
ss.slp.ls1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,184
Likes: 28
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by creepingdeath94
What cam do you recommend in that general range then if not the XFI? I ask because I was thinking about that exact cam when I do mine, but it is going to be a relatively mild motor anyway...350hp maybe by the time all is said and done...mostly a daily driver that has some grunt.

* note...I also ask because the XFI is in the sticky which I did read and it says nothing about it being that bad aside from needing behives.
I'd look into running a cam like a CC503, or even better, Ai's 226/234 cam.

Originally Posted by nik1703
ah i see, but 6th seems to be relatively unchanged. I can't imagine how i'd have traction with bigger gears, i dont have anything in 1st gear right now, just all spinning. Maybe i need some nittos, these sumi's are pretty weak ;]
You think you have traction problems now, wait til you get your CC503 installed.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 06:05 PM
  #13  
nik1703's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 966
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ss.slp.ls1
You think you have traction problems now, wait til you get your CC503 installed.
Yeah, no kidding. Do you think 275 nittos will hold me down with the cc503?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 06:06 PM
  #14  
ss.slp.ls1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,184
Likes: 28
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by nik1703
Yeah, no kidding. Do you think 275 nittos will hold me down with the cc503?
Street or track?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 06:10 PM
  #15  
nik1703's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 966
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ss.slp.ls1
Street or track?
street.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 06:12 PM
  #16  
ss.slp.ls1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,184
Likes: 28
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by nik1703
street.
They will do ok.
I'm about to drop a grand on suspension parts to make 1st gear a little more usable.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 06:15 PM
  #17  
nik1703's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 966
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ss.slp.ls1
They will do ok.
I'm about to drop a grand on suspension parts to make 1st gear a little more usable.
yeah, first gear is useless and im only bolton. i can't see bigger tires fitting on the wheels i have, seems like my only option would be to get some mickey DR's. those aren't cheap. not to mention i don't want to roll around town looking like i just got off the strip.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 06:17 PM
  #18  
slick1851's Avatar
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 1
From: CHITOWN
Default

Originally Posted by nik1703
what gears do you have? i think you told me one time i have 3.42's (stock 1993). what's the point of putting those in if the difference is marginal?


Gears play a huge role in performance, there is a vid in the multi media section of a

full bolton tuned LS1 with a gear M6

Vs

cammed LS1 with boltons and a mild cam with stock gears M6

The geared car would keep up with and pull a little on the cammed car
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 06:19 PM
  #19  
slick1851's Avatar
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 1
From: CHITOWN
Default

Originally Posted by nik1703
yeah, first gear is useless and im only bolton. i can't see bigger tires fitting on the wheels i have, seems like my only option would be to get some mickey DR's. those aren't cheap. not to mention i don't want to roll around town looking like i just got off the strip.
MT drag radials look just a lil more meaty than normal street tires........


Id send the heads out and have them do a mild port job and do a 383 budget stroker motor with a custom cam.

With the parts that you have now, buts thats just me
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2009 | 06:23 PM
  #20  
nik1703's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 966
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by slick1851
MT drag radials look just a lil more meaty than normal street tires........


Id send the heads out and have them do a mild port job and do a 383 budget stroker motor with a custom cam.

With the parts that you have now, buts thats just me
As nice as that sounds, i definitely don't have the budget for that at the moment. I'm pretty sure i'm going to stick to cam/bolton only, possibly gears. DR's are definately in order though, it never rains here... i have no excuse not to sport them
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 PM.