LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

LTX block is cancelled

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2009 | 07:34 AM
  #81  
Houdini's Avatar
TECH Apprentice

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: Central Massachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
This weekend my little motor was doing mid 1.5s spinning. Imagine the torque I would have with another .250-.375 stroke?? A properly done stroker in a stock LT1 block should be all you can handle on true street suspension
Perhaps that good enough for you... having all that you can handle on the street.

But I want MORE than I can handle on the street. In fact, I want so much more, that I laugh myself silly every time I drive. Currently I feel my car is slow and it makes me yawn sometimes.

For us guys that haven't already invested in a built bottom end, this block would have given us a few extra options that we previously didn't have... and in my book, that's a damn good thing!

In the end, we are all just swinging around our E-**** here, bitching and venting about yet another LTX let down.

96capricemgr - For the record, I respect a lot of what you post on these boards and agree with most of your opinions. I lurk and read, you always contribute in the LT1 section and I would notice your absence... just busting your *****.
Old 11-02-2009 | 07:47 AM
  #82  
Houdini's Avatar
TECH Apprentice

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: Central Massachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by Wicked94Z
Exactly... **** most can't afford ported heads and a cam, but suddenly they'll be building "healthy 434s peaking at 6800rpm"?
Thanks for labeling all us LT1 guys poor... I got plenty of money and don"t mind spending it.

I really can't understand why the few of you hate to see a large cube option become available to the LTX... it's almost like you view it as a step back or something.

Yah... LS1/2/3/6 have better heads, hell it's a all around better motor. But the options are what drove their success.
Old 11-02-2009 | 07:59 AM
  #83  
Wicked94Z's Avatar
10 Second Club

iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 1
From: Spokane, Wa
Default

it would have been a step forward, but i think most viewing it as a cost effective alternative to a 383 or 396 "race motor" would be quite disappointed. Plus... it would have been an SHP block, not a little m where you're really getting added strength, improved oiling/cooling, etc
Old 11-02-2009 | 08:04 AM
  #84  
Houdini's Avatar
TECH Apprentice

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: Central Massachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by Wicked94Z
it would have been a step forward, but i think most viewing it as a cost effective alternative to a 383 or 396 "race motor" would be quite disappointed.
I agree 100%

I just like blowing money out my ***... truthfully... if I had some semblance of restraint I'd be rich by now.
Old 11-02-2009 | 08:13 AM
  #85  
Puck's Avatar
TECH Veteran

iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Wicked94Z
you do realize what the "big cube LSX donkeys" are spending for those cubes and the topends that make the cubes work? The're spending more on their valvetrain and heads than 95% of LT1 guys will spend on an entire motor.
This is true.
Old 11-02-2009 | 10:56 AM
  #86  
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 740
Likes: 1
From: MI
Default

Originally Posted by Houdini
Thanks guys... I mean for a moment there, I guess I just wanted more cubes to work with.

Now that I realize more cubic inches suck... I'm just going to leave her at the stock 5.7 displacement. What a moron I am for wanting more options.

Now I'm going to go make fun of all the big cube LSX donkeys and tell them how they are compensating for lack of build skills by heaping on loads and loads of unneeded displacement.
x2.

seems to me like the "big guys" here just dont want their special block in the hands of guys w/ street cars. The fact that you can do whatever with a stock block is no reason not to have a better one.

you build your car how you want it, and Ill build mine the way I want it. That is what the hobby is about.
Old 11-02-2009 | 11:16 AM
  #87  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by Houdini
Perhaps that good enough for you... having all that you can handle on the street.

But I want MORE than I can handle on the street. In fact, I want so much more, that I laugh myself silly every time I drive. Currently I feel my car is slow and it makes me yawn sometimes.

I do not have a stroker yet and I am saying I have my hands full. I am fairly certain more stroke would make things interesting.

I don't think anyone is saying the Dart block would have been a bad thing. What we are saying is the community as a whole is NOT utilizing the block we have and that in the end the sales would not have been there for Dart to sell this cheap AND turn a profit which is afterall what businesses are there to do, make money.
Old 11-02-2009 | 11:42 AM
  #88  
Ed Wright's Avatar
9-Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,397
Likes: 9
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

It's simple enough to convert the heads to conventional cooling, then use the GM Bowtie block made for the one piece rear mains and factory roller cam.
All internams and your oil pan will still fit.

It's a fact that not enough LT1 ownners would step up and buy one, it would take the sale of several hundred blocks for Dart to turn much of a profit. Look at the LTX shoot-out car counts, then look at the LSX shoot-outs. Most LT1 racers, (which are NHRA Stock and Super Stock racers), that could afford one are restricted by the rules to GM blocks, so couldn't use them if they were available. The LT1 is not used for much else but street cars.
Old 11-02-2009 | 12:11 PM
  #89  
SS RRR's Avatar
Village Troll
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,065
Likes: 546
From: Jackstandican
Default

I'm sure the above facts didn't take them by surprise, so why even try? It's been a known fact for yeas LT1 enthusiasts and even owners have been dwindling to nothing.
Old 11-02-2009 | 12:38 PM
  #90  
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,860
Likes: 2
From: Mobile Ala
Default

Originally Posted by JoeliusZ28
lets see:

-torque potential
-by the time i did splayed main caps to a stock block alone id already be at $500, let alone the machining... why not have more potential while im spending the money?
-stronger block, even if i dont need it.


People that dont need the block, but want to purchase it anyway are why the product failed? huh???

Other people whinning is not my problem. No i couldnt afford this block now but that doesnt mean i wasnt saving for it. Dart should not give a damn if i intend to make 450 rwhp or 800. As long as the money is in their hands they are profitting and frankly these street builds would only be helping sales so that the block could actually be produced in the first place and bought by racers. Dart probably wouldnt have even considered building it if it would only have only sold to the small sub-9 second racing crowd.


Im not going to argue that I NEED 427ci but if it only costs a few hundred more in the long run, tell me why the hell wouldnt I? (We never got to see what the pricing was going to be so you cant say i wasnt being hopeful) A wilder top end can hurt driveability whereas increased cubes do not. Just because 700hp has been done doesnt mean it was street friendly.

The block is $1500, THEN you got to machine it, it doesnt come ready to assemble.

For less than $800(including Pro Gram main caps) you could od EVERY trick in the book to an LT1 factory block and build 1000 hp and be reliable.

Torque "potential" LMAO I can set these 325/50's ON FIRE from a 30 roll on. With a six speed I would put down upper 400's in torque, 435 now...torque "potential" hmmm.

You could take my setup, put a hyd roller in it with a six speed behind it make damn near 500 to the wheels and daily drive it. I dont see the confusion here.

There is no need for that block, too many 383/396's make less than 450 to the wheels with a STICK. VERY few make that with an auto.

Spend your money where it needs to be spent to make power, I would rather say I gotta 600 hp 383 than a 500 hp 427. If more people spent the dollars on the CORRECT setup the LT1 would show alot more of its potential.

Last edited by FASTFATBOY; 11-02-2009 at 12:50 PM.
Old 11-02-2009 | 01:20 PM
  #91  
Ed Wright's Avatar
9-Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,397
Likes: 9
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

Well, my na 383" (532 rwhp with non-lockup 4400 converter, and through mufflers) pushed cylinder walls around so bad it would make about ten 1/4 mile passes before the breathers began to get damp. That is with a vacuum pump. First pass with the hone and you could see right where the Hard Block stopped. Splayed steel caps stopped the bottom end from moving around, never did get the cylinders to stay. My Super Stock engine does not have that problem but it is a stock compression 355". It only makes a little over 450at the tires, but that is through a 6000 RPM torque converter.
Old 11-02-2009 | 01:26 PM
  #92  
quik95lt1's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,464
Likes: 12
From: Rhode Island
Default

Originally Posted by FASTFATBOY
The block is $1500, THEN you got to machine it, it doesnt come ready to assemble.

For less than $800(including Pro Gram main caps) you could od EVERY trick in the book to an LT1 factory block and build 1000 hp and be reliable.

Torque "potential" LMAO I can set these 325/50's ON FIRE from a 30 roll on. With a six speed I would put down upper 400's in torque, 435 now...torque "potential" hmmm.

You could take my setup, put a hyd roller in it with a six speed behind it make damn near 500 to the wheels and daily drive it. I dont see the confusion here.

There is no need for that block, too many 383/396's make less than 450 to the wheels with a STICK. VERY few make that with an auto.

Spend your money where it needs to be spent to make power, I would rather say I gotta 600 hp 383 than a 500 hp 427. If more people spent the dollars on the CORRECT setup the LT1 would show alot more of its potential.
468rwhp un-locked vigilante 4200 converter w/ slicks on a land a sea dyno here.....383 cubes is plenty for the air our 23 degree heads can flow

but just to throw it out there I would be interested in swapping all my 385ci components into a stronger block with less flex if one were to be avilable.....oh well ill just stick with my valley girdles and billet mains for now its holding up just fine and I'm shifting at 8000
Old 11-02-2009 | 01:37 PM
  #93  
Ed Wright's Avatar
9-Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,397
Likes: 9
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

Originally Posted by quik95lt1
468rwhp un-locked vigilante 4200 converter w/ slicks on a land a sea dyno here.....383 cubes is plenty for the air our 23 degree heads can flow

but just to throw it out there I would be interested in swapping all my 385ci components into a stronger block with less flex if one were to be avilable.....oh well ill just stick with my valley girdles and billet mains for now its holding up just fine and I'm shifting at 8000
There is one available from GM. Just a little work on the heads to redirect the water flow. Not a big deal. Put an MSD distibutor in the back to loose the Opti and your set.
Old 11-02-2009 | 02:13 PM
  #94  
quik95lt1's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,464
Likes: 12
From: Rhode Island
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Wright
There is one available from GM. Just a little work on the heads to redirect the water flow. Not a big deal. Put an MSD distibutor in the back to loose the Opti and your set.
I'm going with a single plane this winter so I was thinking of ditching the opti and going with a distributor anyway. I'll check it out.

Thanks,
Mike V
Old 11-02-2009 | 02:34 PM
  #95  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 14
Default

That brings up another point I made when this idea of Dart building a block first hit.

Most of you want to do away with everything that seperates and LT1 from a gen 1 anyway. You mistakenly think the intake is bad, the distributor is bad, the waterpump is bad.
Old 11-02-2009 | 03:21 PM
  #96  
quik95lt1's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,464
Likes: 12
From: Rhode Island
Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
That brings up another point I made when this idea of Dart building a block first hit.

Most of you want to do away with everything that seperates and LT1 from a gen 1 anyway. You mistakenly think the intake is bad, the distributor is bad, the waterpump is bad.
The intake is by no means "bad" I made peak power at 7400 rpm with it, it is just not the best option to keep up with a high flowing high reving big cube motor. The log design just doesn't work that efficently. The intake is a great design for most LTx Head/Cam platforms however when you start making peak usable power up around 7-8k rpm the stock intake doesn't really do the job that well. You can see this if you monitor your EGT's on all of your cylinders. As for the distributor yes I will say, it is a bad design. I'm using a crank trigger and I would kind of like to be able to change my cap and rotor without removing half the front of my motor. I like the water pump though lol.
Old 11-02-2009 | 08:19 PM
  #97  
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 740
Likes: 1
From: MI
Default

Originally Posted by FASTFATBOY
The block is $1500, THEN you got to machine it, it doesnt come ready to assemble.
i dont remember official pricing being given, but this is a valid arguement, so touche.

Originally Posted by FASTFATBOY
For less than $800(including Pro Gram main caps) you could od EVERY trick in the book to an LT1 factory block and build 1000 hp and be reliable.
i dont see how this supports your argument that "we dont need this block." First, is that 1000hp going to be streetable? Will it be naturally aspirated? Hydraulic roller? Again, some of us want more cubes for streetability, NOT because we've already pushed and exceeded the limit of the stock block. We dont "need" a stock 285hp V8 either, isnt a V6 good enough?

Originally Posted by FASTFATBOY
Torque "potential" LMAO I can set these 325/50's ON FIRE from a 30 roll on. With a six speed I would put down upper 400's in torque, 435 now...torque "potential" hmmm.
I dont see how this is a valid arguement either. Why cant i have mid 500s if ive got the money to spend? Go back to the 60s/70s and try telling people their big blocks arent necessary because you have a fast 350. ...yea

Originally Posted by FASTFATBOY
You could take my setup, put a hyd roller in it with a six speed behind it make damn near 500 to the wheels and daily drive it. I dont see the confusion here.
And the same setup with more cubes would make more would it not?

Originally Posted by FASTFATBOY
There is no need for that block, too many 383/396's make less than 450 to the wheels with a STICK. VERY few make that with an auto.
No need says who? If everyone was content with what the LT1 was capable of, why have so many switched to LS? Im pretty sure LS cars are still faster, so its all subjective. There are strokers in that power range because thats where they WANT to be.

Originally Posted by FASTFATBOY
Spend your money where it needs to be spent to make power, I would rather say I gotta 600 hp 383 than a 500 hp 427. If more people spent the dollars on the CORRECT setup the LT1 would show alot more of its potential.
I completely agree with spending money correctly however I would NOT rather build more power with less cubes. (for my goals). Given the same power level and budget, an engine with less CI is almost always going to be less street friendly. Just because your build goals are "HP per liter" doesnt mean I want mine to be.

Am I saying this block would have succeeded? No. I have no ground to argue that and in fact I think it was doomed myself. But some of the things being said in this thread are ridiculous IMO. We all have different goals for our builds and we all have different budgets.

Last edited by JoeliusZ28; 11-02-2009 at 08:47 PM.
Old 11-02-2009 | 08:26 PM
  #98  
kgkern01's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 994
Likes: 11
Default

I was a little disappointed to see this turned down, as I planned on just putting in a used engine to get my car back on the road, then buying a Dart block once available, then start buying all of the parts here and there to build it up to a 21* TFS 427 to make a killer street/RR motor.

The good thing is, I'll save some money now. I'll just pull my current 4-bolt block and build up a 385 using the SRP 4.040" pistons I already have sitting here and just get some Scat rods and an Ohio Cranks 3.75" crank, and I'll build on what I already have. Still will go with fully ported 21* TFS heads though .
Old 11-02-2009 | 08:33 PM
  #99  
fuel's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
From: seminole,fl
Default

wow, i think jouliusz28 has very good vies. and we all have diffrent views on a build that we want to do, a can afford to do.
Old 11-02-2009 | 10:06 PM
  #100  
glocklimited9's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
From: CT/NY
Default

Fastfatboy you hit it right on the head



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:45 AM.