LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Bolo's solid roller LT1 new best!!! (video inside)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-29-2009, 08:44 PM
  #41  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
BADHAWK51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicagoland Area
Posts: 1,516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BOLO
Thanks Jeff. I notice, no more stripes on your car's fenders. It looks much better without it IMO.

Thanks I like it better now to.
Old 11-29-2009, 11:32 PM
  #42  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (7)
 
NightTrain66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

beautiful car and it is running real hard.

I was AMAZED to hear that he had been shifting at 6800 RPM on his stock bottom end with the old cam/heads but he said he had been doing it for a long time and had no problem shifting at that kinda RPM.

I would never 'recommend" someone to twist a stock bottom end (stock rod bolts, etc) that kinda RPM but he is lucky and seems to have a freak bottom end that can handle it for someone reason.

For every person successfully shifting there stock bottom end at 6800 RPm with no problem, there are gonna be 4 or 5 others attemting to do so with out the same results.

Lloyd
Old 11-30-2009, 12:58 AM
  #43  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (40)
 
BOLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mundelein,Illinois
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NightTrain66
beautiful car and it is running real hard.

I was AMAZED to hear that he had been shifting at 6800 RPM on his stock bottom end with the old cam/heads but he said he had been doing it for a long time and had no problem shifting at that kinda RPM.

I would never 'recommend" someone to twist a stock bottom end (stock rod bolts, etc) that kinda RPM but he is lucky and seems to have a freak bottom end that can handle it for someone reason.

For every person successfully shifting there stock bottom end at 6800 RPm with no problem, there are gonna be 4 or 5 others attemting to do so with out the same results.

Lloyd
You're definitely right Lloyd. I guess I've taken this motor to its limit. But with good results nonetheless. Thanks again for a KILLER combo.
Old 11-30-2009, 07:30 AM
  #44  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (7)
 
NightTrain66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I just wanted to point that out in case there are others that wanna shove a 240 duration, .660 lift SR cam in there car and shift at 6800 RPM after reading this thread.

For what ever reason, your (BOLO's) engine is able to take this abuse where they will probably not be so lucky at this RPM.

Most agree that 6400-6500 RPM is all you would ever wanna see on a stock bottom end and you are still playing with fire at this point.

If it is your "only car" and daily driver meaning that it would be DEVASTATING if the engine failed, 6300 RPM is what most consider a "safe" limit. Even at this RPM, you "can" have problems but you have better odds of NOT having a problem than if shifting higher compared to a 6500 RPM shift point and MUCH better odss of not having a problem compared to shifting at 6800 RPM.

example - -

shifting at 6300 RPM- 1 out of 20 (5%) people would have a problem and these are probably engines that have seen overheating or skipped oil changes and should not be modded anyway with out a rebuild. Some might have a problem on a "perfectly kept" bottom end but most that have a problem with this RPM would be able to be traced to some "trauma" in its life.

shifting at 6500 RPM- 4/5 out of 20 (20/25%) can have a problem on an average condition stock bottom end.

shifting at 6800 RPM- 15/16 out of 20 (75/80%) can have a problem on an average condition stock bottom end.

These #'s are just my opinion and the #'s may vary 'slightly" if you actually did this test but I would like to show some people not familiar with the GM factory built LT1 stock bottom end (with 80-160K miles), the kind of abuse most feel they "can" or "can't" take.

The car is FLYING and running hard. Working on the 60 ft will get the car in the 10's fo you.

I have recieved with several emails/phone calls about this set up and the info I posted here is the FIRST thing I go over with them when they have a stock bottom end.

"Yes, BOLO is doing this and shifting at that RPM and the stock bottom end may very well live a few more years". I would consider a slightly milder cam, less RPM and/or good rod bolts/rebuild for most people on a stock bottom end.

Lloyd

Last edited by NightTrain66; 11-30-2009 at 07:35 AM.
Old 11-30-2009, 08:59 AM
  #45  
Banned
iTrader: (22)
 
LS1 SPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Schaumburg,IL
Posts: 4,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We have seen many cars here at 6500-6800 rpm over the years with 0 issues. The majority were sprayed on top of this

but there is always that note made that it could live a long or short life at these playing levels

We normally work with low mileage well cared for cars. We like to say anything 70K + we prefer not to break the motor open as most do not know the history of the motor, trans etc as they are used and passed on from numerous owner in most cases.
Old 11-30-2009, 10:51 AM
  #46  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (13)
 
sweetbmxrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: jersey shore
Posts: 2,768
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

awesome setup
Old 11-30-2009, 11:51 AM
  #47  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (14)
 
SPEED#1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Naperville,IL
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BOLO
Brian, starting this Winter you will catch up!

Who here in this forum have a complete bone stock LT1, full weight, a4,stock exhaust from the manifold to the tips, stock airbox/ac delco filter, stock everything can run 13.8@99? I think your car is "freaking" fast with no mods whatsoever!
My car was and ran a 13.77 @ 100, then I put on headers and full exhaust with k&n and with nittos and ran a 13.42@104
Old 11-30-2009, 01:07 PM
  #48  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
GIZMO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 2,780
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Years ago, when I was on a really tight racing budget, I used stock bottom ends in my Stocker. I ran some really good numbers and set several IHRA National Records. I also grenaded a couple!

I would highly recomend going through any motor before running it that hard. At a minimum I would balance it, install ARP rod bolts, and replace the bearings and rings. In the long run it's a lot cheaper than picking up the pieces!!
Old 12-01-2009, 03:28 AM
  #49  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
EMiNENT13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS1 SPEED
Rick and Brian.. you guys have all winter to poke at the rides for spring and I know a guy that will help in anyway possible
haha i know where to go for sure!! i do need some long tubes to start!!!
Old 12-01-2009, 07:46 AM
  #50  
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Elliott's94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oregon Grown
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Congrats on the run BOLO! Car is looking good man! Keep up the good work.
Old 12-01-2009, 10:59 AM
  #51  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
StealthFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Skippack, PA
Posts: 4,798
Received 54 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Wow very impressive results! Car looks absolutely bad ***! I only hope my bottom end and rear last as long as yours have. BTW I need to move out to Illinois seems like there are a ton of LTx guys out there!
Old 12-01-2009, 11:09 AM
  #52  
Banned
iTrader: (22)
 
LS1 SPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Schaumburg,IL
Posts: 4,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We love the Lsx motr, but I do try to keep some killer LTx cars running around the Chicagoland area.

Brian email me a parts list when you are ready and I will do my best for you on parts.
Old 12-01-2009, 12:26 PM
  #53  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
rat93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

all this through a 10 bolt... props
Old 12-01-2009, 04:35 PM
  #54  
Banned
iTrader: (22)
 
LS1 SPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Schaumburg,IL
Posts: 4,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rat93
all this through a 10 bolt... props
well kinda... it broke on this last tracking outing after cutting one 1.39 60ft
Old 12-03-2009, 10:04 AM
  #55  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (40)
 
BOLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mundelein,Illinois
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1 SPEED
well kinda... it broke on this last tracking outing after cutting one 1.39 60ft
Yea, what a bummer. I'm still wondering what it would've ran with that 1.39.
Old 12-03-2009, 11:50 AM
  #56  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
94Z28rag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by BOLO
Who here in this forum have a complete bone stock LT1, full weight, a4,stock exhaust from the manifold to the tips, stock airbox/ac delco filter, stock everything can run 13.8@99? I think your car is "freaking" fast with no mods whatsoever!
I went 13.9 @ 98 with a bone stock convertible with 120k miles. Intake, catback, tune dropped me to 13.2 @ 106 It can be done!
Old 12-03-2009, 11:57 AM
  #57  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 94Z28rag
I went 13.9 @ 98 with a bone stock convertible with 120k miles. Intake, catback, tune dropped me to 13.2 @ 106 It can be done!
Same here. I went 13.9 @ 101, stock.
Old 12-03-2009, 12:11 PM
  #58  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
blackz93's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: nc
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Nice!!
Old 12-03-2009, 03:44 PM
  #59  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Z-RATED94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Carol Stream Il.
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BOLO
Yea, what a bummer. I'm still wondering what it would've ran with that 1.39.
What did it run to the 1/8 when there was a slight problem with it not going into 3rd? Did 2nd gear at least get you to the 1/8 mile?
Old 12-03-2009, 03:54 PM
  #60  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (40)
 
BOLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mundelein,Illinois
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Z-RATED94
What did it run to the 1/8 when there was a slight problem with it not going into 3rd? Did 2nd gear at least get you to the 1/8 mile?
Rick, it went to second, but I aborted before the 1/8--6.86@79.36.


Quick Reply: Bolo's solid roller LT1 new best!!! (video inside)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 PM.