new dyno numbers
Something is off with these numbers and only 360rwtq. That is only slightly better than cam only torque numbers.
I guess track numbers and trap speeds will tell the real story.
An unlocked auto with a stall that big (3800) will normally have a torque spike which should have put out substantially higher torque numbers than the 360 claimed. The torque spike at the beginning of the dyno run should have been well over 400.
Take for example the old LT1 setup I ran. Through a th400 and 9inch with a stall that went to 3500 on the transbrake (on motor), my torque spike went almost to 500rwtq. A th400 except for a few exceptions can not be locked which means that when you dyno with a big stall, you see huge torque.
360rwtq through an unlocked auto with a 3800 stall is VERY low. Had the converter been locked, it still would have been low considering the rwhp the car is claimed to have made. When I made similar power numbers THROUGH A 6SPD I made 390rwtq. How could this auto with a big stall not make more torque but still made those power numbers?
I'm not trying to rain on any one's parade, but I guess the track numbers will tell the true story.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I don't understand why you are bragging about your car instead of logically thinking about what was posted? How did your personal attack support or discredit anything I said? Moreover, how did your post about your car add anything to the comments already made? Did your post support his dyno numbers or congratulate him? Did your post discredit anything I said or provide any counter argument?
PS: My car dyno'd under 350rwhp and ran 98+mph. Good numbers from your car though, I hope they only improve with the recent suspension mods you have done. Good luck!
as for the dyno numbers, some dynos are more generous than others. I've seen a dyno near me read 370rwhp for an LS1 car with LT's and a cut off muffler.
Josh
-Justin



