LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

new dyno numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2010, 12:38 AM
  #41  
11 Second Club
 
NewOrleansLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 1,707
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

nice
Old 03-21-2010, 01:19 PM
  #42  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
 
Tireburnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

SAE or STD numbers?

Something is off with these numbers and only 360rwtq. That is only slightly better than cam only torque numbers.

I guess track numbers and trap speeds will tell the real story.
Old 03-21-2010, 04:47 PM
  #43  
Staging Lane
 
blk6speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Savannah,Ga.
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

good numbers.
Old 03-23-2010, 01:36 AM
  #44  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
Wicked94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Spokane, Wa
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Tireburnin
SAE or STD numbers?

Something is off with these numbers and only 360rwtq. That is only slightly better than cam only torque numbers.

I guess track numbers and trap speeds will tell the real story.
i agree here, i'm making 100 ft lbs more torque with only 30 more cubes... that wide lsa makes for a great peak number but your average torque is gonna suck
Old 03-23-2010, 07:46 AM
  #45  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (17)
 
buzz12586's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Was the converter locked or unlocked? Great numbers either way.
Old 03-26-2010, 09:36 AM
  #46  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Purple Poncho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 397
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by buzz12586
Was the converter locked or unlocked? Great numbers either way.
He PMd me that the converter was unlocked.
Old 03-26-2010, 09:38 AM
  #47  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (17)
 
buzz12586's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Definitely good numbers for being unlocked.
Old 03-26-2010, 11:09 AM
  #48  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
 
Tireburnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Purple Poncho
He PMd me that the converter was unlocked.
If that is in fact true, then this thread and these numbers become even more fishy and unbelievable.

An unlocked auto with a stall that big (3800) will normally have a torque spike which should have put out substantially higher torque numbers than the 360 claimed. The torque spike at the beginning of the dyno run should have been well over 400.

Take for example the old LT1 setup I ran. Through a th400 and 9inch with a stall that went to 3500 on the transbrake (on motor), my torque spike went almost to 500rwtq. A th400 except for a few exceptions can not be locked which means that when you dyno with a big stall, you see huge torque.

360rwtq through an unlocked auto with a 3800 stall is VERY low. Had the converter been locked, it still would have been low considering the rwhp the car is claimed to have made. When I made similar power numbers THROUGH A 6SPD I made 390rwtq. How could this auto with a big stall not make more torque but still made those power numbers?

I'm not trying to rain on any one's parade, but I guess the track numbers will tell the true story.
Old 03-26-2010, 11:59 AM
  #49  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Matts94Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charleston, S.C.
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Just because the SHEEPLE of LS1tech think it's not possible, doesn't mean it's true. If you listen to what everyone says, then you will have a car JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE. C'mon... I have a forged 355 with an outdated cc306 and my car made 330/298... Shitty as hell right? Well it also traps 89mph and runs 7's... and that was before the suspension.
Old 03-26-2010, 12:14 PM
  #50  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
 
Tireburnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Matts94Z28
Just because the SHEEPLE of LS1tech think it's not possible, doesn't mean it's true. If you listen to what everyone says, then you will have a car JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE. C'mon... I have a forged 355 with an outdated cc306 and my car made 330/298... Shitty as hell right? Well it also traps 89mph and runs 7's... and that was before the suspension.
Just because "sheeple" understand physics and the mathematical formula behind calculating RWHP (it is derived from torque) doesn't mean you can't have an incorrect oppinion.

I don't understand why you are bragging about your car instead of logically thinking about what was posted? How did your personal attack support or discredit anything I said? Moreover, how did your post about your car add anything to the comments already made? Did your post support his dyno numbers or congratulate him? Did your post discredit anything I said or provide any counter argument?

PS: My car dyno'd under 350rwhp and ran 98+mph. Good numbers from your car though, I hope they only improve with the recent suspension mods you have done. Good luck!
Old 03-26-2010, 12:26 PM
  #51  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
kierstyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I like how people on this site like to dyno race. The only reason he posted the numbers was because people wanted to see what these heads are capable of granted everyone will make a different power number in the end with different cams and setups. I think he will run pretty good once he gets to the track heck his car went 7.70s in the 1/8th with boltons and over 100 less hp. Not to mention all the weight he has taken out, also he has a good setup to spray the **** out of it and thats what he wanted in the first place!
Old 03-26-2010, 08:20 PM
  #52  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
myltwon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 2,965
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TravisMcGill2000
I have long tubes with 18 inches of pipe on each side. Got 1 chamber flow masters on the end of that.
sounds like a stout combo, you should put a crossover pipe in there, I'm sure it'll pick up some power along the curve and sound nicer too

as for the dyno numbers, some dynos are more generous than others. I've seen a dyno near me read 370rwhp for an LS1 car with LT's and a cut off muffler.
Old 03-27-2010, 10:19 PM
  #53  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TravisMcGill2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: chats,ga
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Sorry guys been busy with my car and work to post. I will try and post dyno graph tomorrow. The 360 rwtq was on 418rwhp pull. The tunner started the pull at high rpms. The tq on a coulpe other pulls were around 400 rwtq.
Old 03-27-2010, 10:21 PM
  #54  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TravisMcGill2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: chats,ga
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The track will tell the real numbers. As soon as i get a pretty sunday i will be at the track.
Old 03-30-2010, 01:30 PM
  #55  
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
 
STOCKTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can get you guys the hookup on them as sister works for trickflow dealer. I can not say how much I picked them up for (dealer price)but if anyone wants a set PM me as she ordered them Friday and I had them Monday directly from TrickFlow. I can garuntee the shop will beat out summit or jegs.............. and take care of you guys if you tell them I sent you.
Josh
Old 04-12-2010, 12:54 AM
  #56  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
SpeedDensityZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Macclenny FL
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TravisMcGill2000
The track will tell the real numbers. As soon as i get a pretty sunday i will be at the track.
Have you had any pretty Sundays yet? It's killing me to know what the car is going to run. 418rwhp. Generous dyno or not it's still going to run about what it use to on the spray just on motor alone. Keep us updated.

-Justin
Old 04-12-2010, 01:07 AM
  #57  
Launching!
iTrader: (11)
 
kaganader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: East Meadow, NY
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oh damn those #'s it put down out of the box are great! Can't wait to see how good you do at the track
Old 04-12-2010, 01:46 AM
  #58  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
WhitePhoenix99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yep, we need some track numbers.
Old 04-12-2010, 02:16 AM
  #59  
Launching!
iTrader: (55)
 
c5formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: san diego, ca
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

mine ran 120mph in the 1/4 while putting down 426rwhp and a race weight of 3450lbs.
Old 04-12-2010, 05:07 PM
  #60  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
kierstyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hes still waiting for the numbers too! He got called into work so hes in New mexico and the car is in Ga. It kinda sucks but gives him something to look forward too when he gets back.


Quick Reply: new dyno numbers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 AM.