LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

first time at track not to impressed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2010, 11:31 AM
  #41  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
acammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Central NY
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Wicked94Z
i guarantee a stock stall, stock gears, shorty headers, flowmaster muffler, stock injectors, mailorder tune and a low shiftpoint could cause him to lose 15 mph.
I wouldn't argue for a second that the build is far from optimized, even the OP notes long tubes, cutout, gears and stall are in the works. But I think its a stretch to say the combination of mods present, all running right, should actually run just a slow as a stone stock car. If the car was running mid 13's at 106mph, you could easily point the finger at a weak launch, poor gearing and less than optimum tune and that would be reasonable. I just don't see this combination running as poor as a stocker unless there is something else wrong.

OP - what was the DA? Shift points? What kinda RPM were you seeing at the strip? Make any other passes, and if so, what did those slips look like?
Old 04-20-2010, 12:12 PM
  #42  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
orange94z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: va
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it was shifting at around 6k and the 1st run i ran REALLY bad high 14 @ 94mph 2.2 60' 9.67 1/8 @75. 2nd run i ran the 14.0 And the last run i ran a 14.21@96 2.1 60' 9.11 1/8@77.62. Times definatly show that it was the first time ever racing.
Old 04-20-2010, 12:38 PM
  #43  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
acammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Central NY
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by orange94z28
it was shifting at around 6k and the 1st run i ran REALLY bad high 14 @ 94mph 2.2 60' 9.67 1/8 @75. 2nd run i ran the 14.0 And the last run i ran a 14.21@96 2.1 60' 9.11 1/8@77.62. Times definatly show that it was the first time ever racing.
Hmm. Don't sweat the times at all, we all had our first time racing. Definitely need to turn that thing faster than 6k to take advantage of the heads/cam - what kind of rev limit did you get with the tune? You're consistently only picking up 19mph in the back half - even if you're short shifting a bit that seems really low, even excusing the stock gears and converter. A good running bolt on car should pick up 22+ mph in the back half, and you're beyond bolt-ons. I agree 100% with Wicked94Z that you're setup is holding you back, but I have a hard time reconciling that it would cost you that much. Once you go gears, converter and long tubes with a dump you'll really start using everything on the table.

Any idea what the DA was? I wouldn't think it would be all that high this time of year in Virgina.
Old 04-20-2010, 12:52 PM
  #44  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
orange94z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: va
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I dont know what the DA was. Ill have to check what the rev limit was set at And i knew the first time would be the bad but i was atleast shooting for 13s. I felt a little better after i picked up about a second between 2 runs. Maybe it will just take some track time to run what it should as i get used to the car... But like i said stall, gears, and longtubes are next on the list. I bought a cutout when i went to the track so maybe ill pick up a little from that ive read the flowmaster doest flow good.
Old 04-20-2010, 12:56 PM
  #45  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
ThoR294's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ringoes/Flemington, New Jersey
Posts: 2,858
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

flowmasters suck... also stall and gears are really killing you. autos are such dogs without that stuff... hell I did 13.6 with a couple of silly mods (short throw, flowmaster). granted, that was at Etown which is like sea level haha
Old 04-20-2010, 01:33 PM
  #46  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
dubga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Thomasville, GA
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You should easily be doing much better than that. My pig-heavy vert ran 13.99 at 99 with A4 and 2.73 gears and a full tank of gas. Other than cai and catback, it is stock. Never even had the valve covers lifted.

I managed to get a best 60' of 2.01 with off-brand street tires. Of course, people were using the track to get ready for the gatornationals that night, so I think the track was coated in super glue. Best I have gotten since that night was 14.1 with a 2.12 60'. But yeah, you are leaving a lot of power either under the hood or in streaks on the track.

Last edited by dubga; 04-20-2010 at 01:47 PM.
Old 04-20-2010, 01:37 PM
  #47  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
Nastyc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

lol e.t experts !! e.t SUCKS. It's BS. look at his mph and wtf with those mods he SHOULD NOT be running 100 mph. I saw a STOCK 97 z28 along side my brothers new 97 ss run 100 mph. I ran a 15.5 @ 127.8 mph anyone care to explain that ?

My guesses are:

compression error
cam installed wrong
Needs a tune
Old 04-20-2010, 01:49 PM
  #48  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
RealQuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 3,970
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

I say forget spending money on LT's.

Get the tune done (verify it with a dyno tune - or street tune with WB). Get a nice stall (3200-3600 somewhere in that area), and get some gear... 3.73's would be nice for a driver.

You should be able to trap 110-112mph with the shorties...
Old 04-20-2010, 03:11 PM
  #49  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
orange94z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: va
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ill try and make it to some other tracks to see if i can get better. And i have read that no stall/gear really kills an auto but i would think it would run alot better. I think it either i havent gotten enough exsperience racing and/or not getting the rpm's up quick enough. And i also was on 3/4 tank of fuel since i didnt plan on racing it and i already filled it up a day or two before i decided.
Old 04-20-2010, 03:55 PM
  #50  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
sepno77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It wouldn't matter if you run a 12.9 at 100mph that wouldn't be impressive either. Your dam MPH is down. If you put your car on a dyno I would put money on it that you wouldn't brake 300rwhp
Old 04-20-2010, 08:02 PM
  #51  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
acammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Central NY
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sepno77
It wouldn't matter if you run a 12.9 at 100mph that wouldn't be impressive either. Your dam MPH is down. If you put your car on a dyno I would put money on it that you wouldn't brake 300rwhp
Agreed, 100%, as I've been saying all along, MPH that low, with that little pickup on the back half is more than a stall/gears issue. If all the basics check out with fuel pressure, knock, timing, then I'd get on a dyno and dial things in. There is no reason you should run slower than my stock 'vert with full bolt on's/cam.
Old 04-20-2010, 09:12 PM
  #52  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
OddballLt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orange94z28
first off the car is a 94 z28 a4. finally got the car out to see what it would run. The best i ran was a 14.06 at 100 mph. With a 2.28 60'. I have a stock bottom end with stock aluminum heads ported and decked .020. 55cc chambers. comp 987 springs, seats, shims. They have stainless 2.0"/1.6" valves. Comp cromemoly retainers, locks and viton seals and 1.6 rr. And the intake has been ported to match heads, Shorty headers, no cats with flowmast muffler, moroso intake, and a madz28 tune.
I wasnt to impressed with the time i was running and think it should run a little faster. What do you guys think. I plan on getting a stall,gears,longtubes,and a cutout.

Ill help you out..

First, the stock converter needs to go. For your setup Id look at anything from a 3600-4000 stall to make your good gains.

Next, swap to 3.73+ gear, this helps to get in your powerband quicker and stay there.

A set of LT's will make a big difference as well, the shorties are killing your midrange.

Finally, get a set of DRs to cut that 60".

With the new stall, gears LT's and tires, you should be in the mid-high 11's easy, barring some abnormal issue.
Old 04-20-2010, 09:31 PM
  #53  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
transam5.7lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,682
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

If its an automatic, why are you shifting manually?
Old 04-21-2010, 06:23 AM
  #54  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
acammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Central NY
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OddballLt1
Ill help you out..

First, the stock converter needs to go. For your setup Id look at anything from a 3600-4000 stall to make your good gains.

Next, swap to 3.73+ gear, this helps to get in your powerband quicker and stay there.

A set of LT's will make a big difference as well, the shorties are killing your midrange.

Finally, get a set of DRs to cut that 60".

With the new stall, gears LT's and tires, you should be in the mid-high 11's easy, barring some abnormal issue.
Where do you people get off thinking that his car, trapping 99-100 mph, only picking up 19mph in the back half, as it sits now, isn't an abnormal issue. All the converter and gear in the world isn't going to matter if the car's down on power.

As its been stated before, ET doesn't mean jack, but that MPH is telling you something - your not making the power you should be.
Old 04-21-2010, 06:50 AM
  #55  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
z_speedfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: limbo
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by acammer
Where do you people get off thinking that his car, trapping 99-100 mph, only picking up 19mph in the back half, as it sits now, isn't an abnormal issue. All the converter and gear in the world isn't going to matter if the car's down on power.

As its been stated before, ET doesn't mean jack, but that MPH is telling you something - your not making the power you should be.
agreed, some things not right..
Old 04-21-2010, 11:04 AM
  #56  
TECH Fanatic
 
WS Sick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kingfisher Oklahoma
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Your car is starting off in each gear well below where it makes any kind of power, Put it above 3500 in each gear and i guarantee that you will pick up 6 to 10 mph at the end.
That cam and 3.23 gears is like putting a trailer behind the thing that weighs a ton.
Old 04-21-2010, 11:19 AM
  #57  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
whytryz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 3,758
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Wicked94Z
am I the only one who noticed he's running a STOCK ******* TORQUE CONVERTER?


lol
Old 04-21-2010, 11:53 AM
  #58  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
orange94z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: va
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WS Sick
Your car is starting off in each gear well below where it makes any kind of power, Put it above 3500 in each gear and i guarantee that you will pick up 6 to 10 mph at the end.
That cam and 3.23 gears is like putting a trailer behind the thing that weighs a ton.
Thats what i was trying to ask ealier. By the time my RPM's get up to where it will will make the most power its too late.
Old 04-21-2010, 12:10 PM
  #59  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
acammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Central NY
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by orange94z28
Thats what i was trying to ask ealier. By the time my RPM's get up to where it will will make the most power its too late.
Definitely gives lots of explanation to your weak 1/8 mile times, I know the 1-2 shift on these are ridiculous, I've had a few 700R4 cars and you've really gotta pull each gear deep so that you don't fall off. Still, if you're shifting at 6000rpm (Should probably be closer to 6500 with the auto), even with a stock stall, you're not going to drift under 3500rpm on the 1-2 shift, and the 2-3 isn't nearly as bad.

It still doesn't explain away the really low trap speed - in the back half your not in subject to the big cam/stock stall fail that you're getting off the line, and the car should be picking up more than it is. You shouldn't be making stock or less than stock power in the 4000rpm+ range that you're seeing on the back half of the track, but your numbers say you are.
Old 04-21-2010, 12:32 PM
  #60  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
orange94z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: va
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well i wasnt manually shifting it either i left it in drive and let it go so maybe that hurt me...


Quick Reply: first time at track not to impressed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 PM.